register for free

Dog News

Insurer pulls of out pet insurance market – owners worried about vets' bills

Dog owners have been left worrying about vets' bills after a pet insurer announced it is pulling out of the pet insurance market. 50,000 policy holders are affected. State-owned Lloyds TSB, who owns Halifax, announced that it is unaffordable to continue to offer pet cover last October, following in the footsteps of 13 other insurers who have blamed increasing vets' fees for their decision.

It is reported that the average cost of treatment for pedigree cat costs 28 per cent more than a year ago. For a pedigree dog it is 13 per cent on average. Insurance has increased by more than a third in that time.

Customers of Lloyds, whose existing cover will end in September, are concerned that they will not be able to get cover from other insurers for pre-existing illnesses and will either have to somehow finance the vets' fees themselves or consider putting their animals to sleep. Many have lobbied Lloyds Banking Group to change its decision. The Consumer Action Group is preparing a legal challenge, saying the bank has gone back on its promise to cover these animals and abandoned them. Marc Gander, founder of Consumer Action Group, pointed out that people have paid thousands of pounds over the years for cover.

“Some will now have no choice but to put down their animals because they can't afford to pay for their animals' medical bills,” he said. He hopes the insurer will either reinstate the insurance or pay lump sums to owners whose pets were currently undergoing treatment. Lloyds and Halifax policies were attractive since the pet was insured for an illness for life, provided cover was renewed yearly, and Halifax allowed up to to £6000 a year to be claimed.

The head of rehoming at the Blue Cross confirmed that the charity is seeing an increasing number of people unable to afford vets' fees and a rise in abandoned animals and agreed that the decision would increase the risk of more sick animals going untreated,

A spokesman for Lloyds said [we are] sorry for any inconvenience caused but insisted that the insurer reserves the right to cancel policies.

Your comments and views:
alexgirl73
Almost a Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,202
Female 
 
04-02-2012, 05:21 PM
oh my!!! Surely what they should be doing is closing the books to any new customers and seeing out the promised cover on existing? Something has to give as vets are becoming increasingly expensive, and people just don't have that sort of money anymore.
Reply With Quote
Rolosmum
Dogsey Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,676
Female 
 
04-02-2012, 05:41 PM
I agree they should be allowed to close the door to new customers, but continue to offer cover to those with existing, although even if they did the rise in costs would probably be exhorbitant, as they reserve the right to amend terms anyway!
Reply With Quote
nickmcmechan
Almost a Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,396
Male 
 
05-02-2012, 07:45 AM
It seems that everyone that is puling out are the non specialists, i.e. people that have jumped on the insurance bandwagon

however, theses organisations as a whole have not such down so I think its immoral for them to cease paying out on their current obligations
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,574
Male 
 
05-02-2012, 06:54 PM
Very sad, but I must say I can see their point of view - Vets fees seem to have shot up, we ended up paying 50% more for Rocky's epiphen in the last couple of years.

Anyone else think their profits should be capped? It's wrong to make so much profit out of what is essentially something that people can't live without - pet care is not a luxury item Surely a vet's practise shouldn't be a business, but more a service. Make a comfortable living of course, but to profiteer out of illness to such an extent? Reprehensible.
Reply With Quote
alexgirl73
Almost a Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,202
Female 
 
05-02-2012, 07:07 PM
completely agree Azz! My new vets charge £15 for a consultation, whereas I know of thers who charge upwards of £25 before they've even looked at the pet.

I had to take one of my cats there on friday, for a consultation, metacalm injection and weeks worth of drops it was £25 all in, the last practice I was at charged over £45 for the exact same thing, how is that possible? And my new vets is in a fab new building with loads of mod cons, so not as if they are a backstreet practice so to speak.
Reply With Quote
kammi_sparky123
Dogsey Veteran
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,979
Female 
 
05-02-2012, 08:29 PM
Totally agree Azz!

Alexgirl73 - My vets is a fortune, its about £25 for a small animal consultation (and I mean small, as in hamster/rat size...) and that's if it only takes about 2 mins!

Luckily I haven't been to the vet with Alfie in a while, but I know my vets is really over priced tbh.

All the vets in Edinburgh seem to be the same price though
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,574
Male 
 
07-02-2012, 05:26 PM
BBc have run a story on this today: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16923360

Thousands of pet owners have been told that they will not have their insurance policies renewed by Lloyds TSB and Halifax. Many are worried they will face enormous bills or will even have to give away their pets.
No word about the hike in vets prices tho!
Reply With Quote
Razcox
Dogsey Veteran
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,636
Female 
 
07-02-2012, 05:26 PM
Agree with others that hey should be held on their cover for life on exsisting customers.

I also agree with Azz and dont agree with how much partners of a vets firm make. I also dont see why VAT is charged on vets fees when its against the law to not treat a sick animal.
Reply With Quote


 
Thread Tools

Where next?

Dog News Homepage
Latest and popular news, by week, month, year and all-time!

Dog News Forum
Shows dog related news by latest activity

Submit A News Story
Info on how to submit a news story

Latest Dog News...

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top