|
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,723
|
|
Originally Posted by
Loki's mum
My puppies have been off lead from day one. Rio and Dan stay reasonably close to me anyway. I have to agree with Johnderondon - if your dog could potentially kill a puppy that approaches it, it should be muzzled or walked where it won't meet other dogs.
It's a pet hate of mine that those with dog aggressive dogs walk them in popular dog walking areas. If a dog can only be lead walked - walk it round the streets and leave the open spaces for sociable dogs.
(and yes I have had experience of walking da dogs - and it's about being considerate to other dog walkers.)
Originally Posted by
labradork
I have always let my puppies off lead from day one. As others have said, they stick with you until their confidence grows. If you teach them good habits early on they generally continue with that.
If you NEVER let a puppy off lead 'just in case' it doesn't recall, you are making a rod for your own back. The people I know of that have done this (kept puppies on lead for fear of losing them) now have young adult dogs that cannot contain themselves when they actually are let off lead because it is too exciting for them. Their recall has SUFFERED because they actually haven't had off-lead experiences early on.
Besides, I don't believe that any dog has a perfect recall. You can have a pretty darn near perfect recall, but I don't believe in perfection 100% of the time...they are animals after all. So where do you draw the line?
As for the owners of aggressive dogs, if the dog is aggressive to the point where it would attack (and kill) a puppy then IMO it should be muzzled. In a perfect world, everyone who let's their dog off lead would have complete control of them. Of course, the reality is far different. The average dog owner has an average recall on their dog and if you have your dog on lead for whatever reason, right or wrong, you are going to have off lead dogs coming up to you sometimes.
Originally Posted by
Loki's mum
I agree with this! My dogs have reasonably good recall, but will never have 100% recall. I shouldn't have to keep mine on lead all the time because other people have dangerous dogs with them.
Right, firstly I never said my dog was aggressive and dangerous! He is dominant and doesn't like other like-minded dogs approaching him. We have had him for 3 years and he has never ever gone for another dog BUT that isn't to say that he might!
I made the reference about attacking and killing a pup, not about my dog, but because of another topic on here where a dog killed a pup and may now be pts, I was questioning which dog was really to blame??
I have 100% recall with him which is just as well! Because, when we took him on, we were told he was dog aggressive it has made me very nervous but as I said he has never gone for another dog since we have had him. He has been loose around lots and lots of dogs and if anything prefers to be with us rather than other dogs.
I too have to be careful where we walk as there is a real idiot in our street who walks both his aggressive dogs off lead (they are also people aggressive!!)
My point is people who allow their puppies to approach strange dogs shouldn't blame the strange dog if it attacks their puppy.
My first dog, when I was 11, used to stick to me like glue and I walked him off lead on a private estate from the minute I got him. In the right place I have no objection to off lead walking and I agree puppies have to go free at some point and sooner than later is much better. It is easier if you have an older dog for a pup to learn from.
Long lines are the perfect training solution as they have the freedom and yet you can control then if necessary.
Again my main point was that people seem to blame the dogs and not the uncontrolled puppy when these awful accidents happen. I didn't mean to infer that puppies should never be allowed off lead, just that there is a time and a place.
Please read my posts carefully before jumping on me!