I think you need to re-read the thread.... what part is the none truth... was I re faring to .

The post by mishflynn, who states MR uses her dog on other peoples bitches... is that a lie!!

As I thought she was defending MR with that statement. when someone called MR a breeder.


If a person has a stud dog, what does that make them???????

I am not interested in whether MR breeds or not, you are right it is no ones business but hers.

I asked a general question, as to what makes a breeder... whether it be MR or Joe Blogs???

We discuss and give opinions everyday on subjects that dont concern us,... it is the life of a forum.

I didnt know it was against rules to ask questions!!

Rooney is a little sweetheart and sooooo funny to watch her "work" him! he knows all the same things but in his lurcherish way does it in his own time bless him - thought he was great x

if thata the discussion you want to have mayba another thread would be appropriate x

You have preached to me twice tonight and I'm NOT happy but rather than argue with you (I can't be bothered)I'm gonna walk away but if you weren't intrested why bother to post on the life of a stud dog owner, for us who have stud's we know our responsiblites thankyou. So you don't need to preach. And for all those who don't know about responsiblities regarding the owning of a stud well that's why people come to Dogsey.
And to me you never asked what makes a breeder you stated and it was totally Off topic as is this replie, but hell i'm returning the response.


Nobody said it was against the rules.



Sorry OP off topic.

By insinuation, particularly the comment "Or does she believe once her dog has done his job, it is not her responsibility anymore."

It was an unwarranted comment, had you said, "I hope she sets a good example regarding the responsibility side ?" that would have been a fair question rather than your wording which came across as a dig.

As far as I`m concerned the owner of both sire and dam should take equal responsibility and yes both owners would be categorised as breeders because each of their dogs are necessary to create a litter obviously.
However, the claim was made that `someone` was going to view a litter of her pups, when usually a litter is viewed in the dams home, not the sires.

I`m amazed you need to ask me that, I thought you knew my views on breeding and breeder responsibility.

None of which has anything to do with HTM

Pardon...

Where have I preached to you, I have answered your quote , from my post, thats all!


Where Have I questioned your responsibility of being a stud dog owner?? or preached to you about it.

When we read posts, (all of us) we look and read, somethings we pick up on some we dont.

I read something that was in this post (relevent) I did not go of topic, I was interested in the thoery of the post.

I did not state anything I gave an opinion, there is a differenece .

But at the time she had these other breeds Becky, she said she could train any dog to do agility, obedience, etc.. however they quickly dissappeared! (from action) I just wondered what happened to the fact she could do this, I cant seem to find anything these dogs have done, except the Sheltie, who made a few faux pars when it "performed" at crufts either last year or the year before.

She can't have all her dogs performing all the time though can she! Just because they aren't on the telly doesn't mean she doesn't use them in demonstrations anywhere else.
Becky

I think thats what jackbox was saying Patch, but some seem to disagree.

So you can find me somewhere NOT on the TV they have "performed" then? I cant at present, and I wouldnt watch it on the TV either!