register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Adam P
Almost a Veteran
Adam P is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,497
Male 
 
07-12-2010, 10:20 PM
Originally Posted by Dobermann View Post
I interpret that as not wanting the affection from them just a dog that will do whatever it is told and make the handler look 'in control' because its doing what its told? If you didnt want them to be dependant..

Adam, have you read any modern books on training through positive reinforcement and tried it properly at all?
I want affection but I don't want a dog so badly behaved/so unsocial it can't cope without its hand being held.

PLenty, I use a lot of tehniques, just find e collars useful.

E collars as I use them are pretty modern btw.

Adam
Adam P
Almost a Veteran
Adam P is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,497
Male 
 
07-12-2010, 10:21 PM
Originally Posted by Dobermann View Post
Adam, if you take a look around yourself you will realise there will be people who train using an E-collar and it dosnt work, if they cannot get timing right with a clicker, think of the damage done with bad timing and an E-collar!

If they get stressed and start buzzing away instead of shouting how much more damage is that to the dog?!

Someone with bad timing, bad tone, bad body language but has patience will still have a better dog than someone with all the above and no patience to spend on training effort.
My experience is they don't, e collars work and they work easily! This takes frustration out of it for the owner.

Adam
Adam P
Almost a Veteran
Adam P is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,497
Male 
 
07-12-2010, 10:26 PM
Originally Posted by Dobermann View Post
No, its excitement and exercise.

IMO Sch is based on positive reinforcement as the sleeve is a reward, its a big game! They love it. They are encouraged to get excited over the sleeve to start with and progress from there.........and the rest is tracking which is a plesure to many dogs then the rest is obedience work.

What makes you think positive reinforcement always starts with a negative?
Learning therory!!!

One reason these competing dogs get so hyped is the frustration of the delayed reward of that lead grab at the end anyway, e.g. obed dogs aren't just highly focused because they love what they are doing, they are highly focused looking and waiting for the reward.

It's the same principle of training by holding back a security dog from a tempting "criminal" before releasing it, to build the aggression (or what you would term the drive), via the frustration of delayed reward - the bite,

Adam
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 10:34 PM
I remember now.

When this first was bandied about forums, it was claimed that dogs who were trained positively, were in fact not . It was claimed they were being trained via negatve punishment (ie the removal/witholding of a reward such as a toy or food).

Thus the "idea" of stress (bad stress)... as dog was supposedly very upset it knew an owner had a sausage in their pocket, or a toy.

Skinner made a clear difference between positive reinforcement and negative punishment, it cannot go:

Behaviour -----> dog feels negatively punished.....> dog is positively reinforced

It DOES go:

Behaviour ........> dog is positively reinforced.

However if anyone knows different and has the science to prove it, do say

Wys
x
rune
Dogsey Veteran
rune is offline  
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 10:47 PM
The behaviour becomes its own reward.

In work done with clickers and handicapped kids they learnt to clear up and in the end would do it as rewarding activity in itself.

Of course in Adams world you'd give them a shock when they refused to co operate----as they do at one appalling place in the US.

rune
Lucky Star
Dogsey Veteran
Lucky Star is offline  
Location: Usually in a muddy field somewhere
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,145
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 11:02 PM
Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
Whats the questions doberman?

Kruse, still don't see your point!

Adam
You (claim to) have a degree and still don't see this point? I know they talk about dumbed down education but really ...

Originally Posted by Krusewalker View Post
then if i accept you are indeed telling the truth on that (ummm.....tough one that ), then i would have to conclude you would indeed be the least brightest trainer on the block....as everyone else whom read it and responded understood the point i was making.

i even got a rep point myself for that post.

it gets more and more tony blair....
Your point was very clear!

Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
I want affection but I don't want a dog so badly behaved/so unsocial it can't cope without its hand being held.

PLenty, I use a lot of tehniques, just find e collars useful.

E collars as I use them are pretty modern btw.

Adam
No, you'd rather it was bullied into submission until it becomes a shadow. Techniques and methods? You do not know any, other than punishment.

You've failed - after a huge number of posts, nothing has changed. You pitch yourself as a 'trainer' but I would not trust you with my child's toy pull-along dog.
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,958
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 11:06 PM
Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
I did not work it out & it is not my theory. B F Skinner, the originator of the theory worked it out, it’s his theory.

Adam
Do you have a reference for it please????
Lucky Star
Dogsey Veteran
Lucky Star is offline  
Location: Usually in a muddy field somewhere
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,145
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 11:10 PM
Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
My experience is they don't, e collars work and they work easily! This takes frustration out of it for the owner.

Adam
And once again, that says it all. An apparent quick fix and never mind the consequences.

That is the attitude of a lazy owner/trainer who can't be bothered to/isn't capable of forming a proper relationship with a dog and train it humanely.

God bless the owner who isn't frustrated, eh? But never mind the poor dog.
Ben Mcfuzzylugs
Dogsey Veteran
Ben Mcfuzzylugs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 11:15 PM
Yes wys - good point - Adam is missusing learning theory here anyway
Punishment is something that makes a behaviour less likely to happen
so what behaviour is being supressed by me witholding a ball the dogs didnt know was there, didnt know they were going to get (and BTW I chuucked it before they reached me)

and nope the methods you are describing are not 'modern' it is a twist on the ear pinch forced retreve

you are using positive punishment (zapping when they are not comming back) and negative reward (stopping zapping when they do what you want)
VV sad

and what do I do if my dogs dont come back - I look at what I did wrong, how the situation was more than they could cope with, and I increase my training, reduce the distractions and be more vigalent of the surroundings when I call them back
Of course a not fully trained dog will not come back each and every time if you call them in a situation they are not ready for - its my job not to put them in that situation

even using a shock it will take a few repititions for a dog to understnad that 'sit' means 'put your bum on the floor in any situation, no matter where the handler is, no matter if the nasty shock device is not strapped to my privates'
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,958
Female 
 
07-12-2010, 11:19 PM
Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
My experience is they don't, e collars work and they work easily! This takes frustration out of it for the owner.

Adam
Your experience is lacking then Adam. One of your gurus introduced a guy and his dog to remote training. Some time later on the madmans own forum, desperate owner was worried sick because the collar was broken and he couldn't find a replacement quickly with a battery that would last 12-14 hours and would charge in the few hours the dog slept. The desperation of his post was clear. The dog wasn't trained, it was controlled by shock and without it the guy was obviously afraid of his dog.

The forum, like many others the idiot set up was taken down by the forum hosts so I can't link to the post. That's the only pity of it being taken down because it was a very clear message to anyone considering embarking on the route of remote training - DON'T!!
Closed Thread
Page 74 of 98 « First < 24 64 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 84 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top