|
Location: Southern California, USA
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 73
|
|
Goodness...I dislike doing multiple quotes but you guys really pack on the pages to these threads.lol. Not that theres anything wrong with that
Originally Posted by
JuniorDaddy
But Steven, they are not ineffective. There are many people, myself included, who will tell you he has worked for us. Am I then not PROOF that they are effective?
I'm not arguing about whether it works or not. I agree, it definitely works, but it is still ineffective. If you want a dog to stop pulling on a lead, you can cut off his legs...that works doesn't it?You want a dog to stop barking you can debark it, does that work? Yes, Is it effective or humane? Nope. Now I'm not saying that you guys condone this, its to illustrate that some things may work but may still lack the effectiveness to do the job right.
Originally Posted by
Gnasher
I had one of them - Hal ! he hated being touched, caressed or patted. He didn't "care" about people - he did care about his own "pack", but he would never lower himself to admit to it. His reward was the same as Tai's - told he was a good boy, which didn't impress him at all, or if possible, a good walk, which did.
Seeing how you added this, then I would question your bond with your dog....
I'm not saying that all dogs have to go nuts over pats (mine doesn't) but it should provide
some reinforcement.
Originally Posted by
Gnasher
Sorry darling, got carried away there! A bit like when the anti-CM-ers talk about stringing dogs up !!
Again with CM...why is always about CM and the 'antis', theres nothing wrong with that dude, just the methods he uses...goodness sake we can talk just as much about the techniques that Brad Pattison uses if you'd like? (they aren't all THAT different)
Originally Posted by
Tassle
I think to many people feel that it is a form of bribery and they feel that the dog should do as its told because it wants to.
Treats can definitely become a crutch for training if used incorrectly. If you hold out a piece of food and call to your dog and he comes for the food...thats a bribe. If you call to your dog, he comes, and you give him a treat from your pocket (which he didn't see before) thats a reward.
For a bit more info on this see:
http://www.dogstardaily.com/blogs/it-bribe-lure
I'm sure you guys in the UK are acquainted with Dr. Ian Dunbar
Originally Posted by
Gnasher
I wouldn't of course leave him alone though, and neither have I ever seen CM do so
I hate to bring it up...but I wonder how that incident happened with him being sued for leaving a dog on a treadmill. While I don't think this makes CM a bad person, it does discredit
your arguement about him not doing it.
Originally Posted by
Gnasher
in that case, I don't need to look cos i know that clip inside out, and its rubbish. The dog is not being strangled, he is doing that to himself! This is the wolf cross that CM kicks - fully accept that. But not strangling.
Wow....do you just water down
everything CM does. Being a fan is one thing but being close minded is quite different. If the dog was strangling himself and whatever else you say, then why are vets all around upset by it?
See:
http://vetmedicine.about.com/b/2009/...illan.htm?nl=1
Not only does this say something about his methods but it also says alot about you....
Originally Posted by
JuniorDaddy
I couldn't agree or disagree as I am not expert.
Not to bash on you personally...but you keep saying that. This only demonstrates your lack of confidence and lack of understanding of the theories behind canine behavior and behavior modification. If you don't know, then go learn, and come back and make an
informed decision, not what you
think.
Originally Posted by
Tassle
As for Pack leaders who make mistakes - they do not remain pack leaders.
Wow...I never thought of that...but you are so right! Brilliant!!! But you know leaders that use force also don't remain leaders. The following paste is my synthesis of articles written from a couple of behaviorist and biologist:
"The dominance model doesn’t work because in the wild wolf leaders are seldom aggressive.
In the wild, the leading wolves are seldom aggressive, there is no need to be. As any parent would, the male and female breeders (or what would incorrectly be called the ‘alphas’) are completely sure of their status and they know they don’t need to go around bullying everyone else to make sure they know too. On the occasion where true dominance hierarchies are formed (such as in captivity) the leaders that use force to back up their status are usually quickly disposed of. This is because aggressive behaviors are a waste of energy, energy that they could well be using for the benefit of the pack such as hunting. Peace is maintained in packs through submissive behavior rather than dominant behaviors. For example, if there is a bone that two members want, the less assertive wolf (most likely one of the younger offspring) would willingly give it up to the other wolf (such as an older sibling or parent); instead of being a fight (waste of energy) the peace is maintained through an act of submissiveness. This is why peace at home can’t really be maintained through constant bullying.
It has been noted that in large packs which consist of more than one breeding pair, the middle ranked wolves may occasionally bicker to establish themselves as more dominant; however the breeding male and female still don’t bicker because they are secure about their position, and neither do the lower ranking wolves as they know that others are higher ranked than they are. Taking this into consideration, what does this tell you if you are constantly having to ‘establish your dominance’ over your dog? You are belittling yourself because a leader doesn’t bicker, not only that but you are giving your dog a reason to engage in even more squabbling because you seem insecure about your position as head of the family."
Originally Posted by
Gnasher
Even pack leaders make mistakes. The TRUE pack leader will learn from it, and not do it again.
To say the least...thats anthorpomorphic...at worst that statement shows a lack of understanding of TRUE hierarchies.