register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:02 PM
Originally Posted by Ben Mcfuzzylugs View Post
and I also said to use treats to train, I never said not to use treats just that if a foody dog couldnt take treats then they needed to start with a less stimulating time until they could take treats
Would you also have recomended that with Mia when she came to me, when she had a episode at another dog barking and lunging she was unable to take treats
Would you really have advised a 1/2 starved ex stray to have food witheld - or simply take a few paces back until she could focus



You are seriously talking about not feeding a dog for a few DAYS here?? I thought you ment skipping a couple of days

actually not feeding for several DAYS to bend a dog to your will is actually abuse

Ah so I not only STARVE dogs now, but I also ABUSE them? And I BEND THEM TO MY WILL!

ROFLMAO I think you should meet my dogs, my clients and their dogs, you will find nothing could be further from the truth!

If you wish to put words in my mouth that is of course your privilege.

If you wish to infer from my posts something other than is said, that is your choice.

The thing is, that neither option makes you correct!

LOL

Your accusations are, as always, very revealing!
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
28-06-2011, 04:07 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
We wiil agree to disagree with the semantics over hungry v starving.

I agree with that one


I KNOW what starvation is, and it aint going without food for a few days!

You need capitals to emphasize your point, you are not alone on KNOWING what starvation is ,

Dogs in the wild, actually feast and fast. They gorge and then they do not eat for days.


We are not talking about dogs in the wild why do people have to always use that analogy,

So if I have a dog that has got the squits do I FAST it or do I STARVE it?The two are not the same.


Personally I do neither, I allow my dog to fast itself, then I introduce bland food when he is willing to take it.

As I said, if you are happy not to have a reliable recall and be restricted by that fact, that is up to you.

Who said I dont have a reliable recall

But if you WANT a reliable recall then there is no reason you cannot have one with the majority of dogs and the majority of breeds.

True, but in some cases the dogs dont read the books and reliable is never going to be in their vocabulary


I certainly would NOT equate FASTING or making a dog HUNGRY with E collars.

I would certainly equate withholding food for 4 days with the same cruelty as one would use using e.collars.

In fact to say such a thing is total nonsense as of course one is NEGATIVE punishment, the other is POSITIVE punishment.


In your opinion I might add, thankfully its not the only one .

I call withholding food for such a time as a negative, not a positive
.


STARVATION of course IS a positive punishment.

But nobody ever STARVED going without food for few days!
True, but why would you want to inflict such a punishment on your dog!

You obviously have no problem with such methods, fine, but dotn expect others to find it palatable.
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
28-06-2011, 04:12 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
Ah so I not only STARVE dogs now, but I also ABUSE them? And I BEND THEM TO MY WILL!

!
I would have thought the fact you are withholding food for 4 days is abuse, and you are doing it for the sole reason to get your dogs to "obey" you.

So BM, is not far off her assumption is she when she accuses you of abuse!
Reply With Quote
talassie
Dogsey Veteran
talassie is offline  
Location: yorkshire
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,629
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:21 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
I would have thought the fact you are withholding food for 4 days is abuse, and you are doing it for the sole reason to get your dogs to "obey" you.
But food is not being witheld. It is there if the dog wants it. It is just being given in a different place, out on a walk rather than from a bowl. Many trainers advocated feeding food rations when training.
Reply With Quote
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:22 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear

I KNOW what starvation is, and it aint going without food for a few days!

You need captials to enphasie your point, you ar not alone on KNOWING what starvation is ,

No I do not NEED capitals, using them is a means of emphasis, the same as using italics, underlining or emboldening text (or all three) LOL

It is something that people use in text

Dogs in the wild, actually feast and fast. They gorge and then they do not eat for days.


We are not talking about dogs in the wild why do people have to always use that point,

Er because we LIKE to use that point because it demonstrates that this is their NATURAL behaviour, the same way as eating raw food is NATURAL to them and NORMAL not anything out of the ordinary!

So if I have a dog that has got the squits do I FAST it or do I STARVE it?The two are not the same.


Persoanaly I do neither, I allo wmy dog to fast itsself, then I introduce bland food when he is willing to take it.

Sometimes we have to do what we think is best for the dog and not keep offering food until we see it is willing to take it. Some dogs do not know when they should not eat, like children, so as responsible carers we need to know when it is wise not to eat.

A bit like STARVING a dog before an operation!¬

As I said, if you are happy not to have a reliable recall and be restricted by that fact, that is up to you.

Who said I dont have a reliable recall

When I use the word "you" it does not necessarily mean I am addressing YOU, it is just a figure of speech, used by many.

But if you WANT a reliable recall then there is no reason you cannot have one with the majority of dogs and the majority of breeds.

True, but in some cases the dogs dont read the books and reliable is never going to be in their vocabulary

As this statement actually mirrors mine it is superfluous. In fact I have found that dogs do not read books in ALL cases!


I certainly would NOT equate FASTING or making a dog HUNGRY with E collars.

I would certainly equate withholding food for 4 days with the same cruelty as one would use using e.collars.

Yes, I know, it is interesting, how some people think it cruel to deny their dogs anything, but again it is not CRUEL to withhold food, only CRUEL to starve.

Some people think it is CRUEL to leave a dog alone all day. OR to not let it go upstairs etc etc. We all have our own particular parameters don't we?


In fact to say such a thing is total nonsense as of course one is NEGATIVE punishment, the other is POSITIVE punishment.


In your opinion I might add, thankfully its not the only one .

That is what forums are for, sharing opinions, right, wrong, informed or not.


I call withholding food for such a time as a negative, not a positive.

Er yes, that is what I said, a negative punishment not a positive one, I am glad you agree.

STARVATION of course IS a positive punishment.

But nobody ever STARVED going without food for few days!

True, but why would you want to inflict such a punishment on your dog!

But I do not see witholding food a terrible punishment, witholding WATER would be. You do.

You obviously have no problem with such methods, fine, but dotn expect others to find it palatable.

Difficult to find anything palatable when you are not eating anything isn't it?!

I do not EXPECT others to do anything, the same way as your views may not be palatable to many others.

We are all different, thank goodness eh?
Reply With Quote
Ben Mcfuzzylugs
Dogsey Veteran
Ben Mcfuzzylugs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:24 PM
Originally Posted by talassie View Post
But food is not being witheld. It is there if the dog wants it. It is just being given in a different place, out on a walk rather than from a bowl. Many trainers advocated feeding food rations when training.
Yup I use my dogs food along with other things during training
and yup if we are doing agility or something then their tea will be a little later than usual - after the class

BUT
SB said to withold food for several days
That is not the same
Reply With Quote
talassie
Dogsey Veteran
talassie is offline  
Location: yorkshire
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,629
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:27 PM
Originally Posted by Ben Mcfuzzylugs View Post
BUT
SB said to withold food for several days
That is not the same
Well to my mind food is available to the dog if he wants to come and get it. That is not the same as witholding food for several days.
Reply With Quote
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:28 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
I would have thought the fact you are withholding food for 4 days is abuse, and you are doing it for the sole reason to get your dogs to "obey" you.

So BM, is not far off her assumption is she when she accuses you of abuse!
I have looked but I cannot find the post where that FACT appeared?

You know the one where I am withholding food for 4 days?

Can you see that anywhere? Did I overlook it?

And where does it say that witholding food is for the SOLE reason to get my dogs to obey me?

Do you have a SOLE reason why you train your dogs.

So we have established that both yourself and BM believe that I am an abuser of animals.

I would report me if I was you, I don't know how you could live with yourself to know that I was practising animal abuse by the cruelty I am inflicting on all these dogs and putting them at such risk
Reply With Quote
Ben Mcfuzzylugs
Dogsey Veteran
Ben Mcfuzzylugs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:31 PM
Witholding food for several days is NOT positive punishment

with positive punishment the dogs action causes something to happen that he wishes to not happen again so he learns not to do that thing again
the punishment has to be quick after the undersired behaviour

The dog is not going to equate not paying attention to you in the park to not getting his dinner 12 hours later

Witholding the food is just to make the dog so bl00dy hungry that he becomes totaly focused on getting food


IF my dog had the squits and I just fasted him for 4 days without getting a vet to look at him that would be cruelty
yes possibly it is needed to skip A meal or two - but if more than a day is needed then that is very cruel
Reply With Quote
Ben Mcfuzzylugs
Dogsey Veteran
Ben Mcfuzzylugs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
Female 
 
28-06-2011, 04:38 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
Missing a meal, or even a days food is not exactly what I had in mind.

If you use food, and ONLY feed the dog on recalls, after 3 or 4 days he will find bogging off increasingly unattractive.

You have as yet not found any way of decreasing the likelihood of him bogging off as the consequences of bogging off have not been sufficiently severe.

But it is your choice.

Hunger is very motivating and by that I MEAN hunger, not "I am feeling a little peckish"
thats where the 4 days came from
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 9 of 16 « First < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top