register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
nero
Dogsey Veteran
nero is offline  
Location: central scotland
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,637
Male 
 
02-05-2008, 04:03 PM
Both methods IMO are to inflict discomfort or even pain, this is completely unnecessary, whatever happened to the reward method of training ?.
Reply With Quote
Fourfeet
Dogsey Junior
Fourfeet is offline  
Location: Devon
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 05:50 PM
Originally Posted by inkliveeva View Post
some times thats a draw back to having a dog though, my wee shar pei was on lead for 9 years

Yeah it is, but I like my dogs to be able to run free and sniff what they want when they want , run and play with other dogs.
I think my dog would also prefer a couple of shocks on the collar then free rein for the rest of there lives rather than a boring life walking on the lead. I have only shocked twice for chasing sheep and have never need to again I don't even put the collar on him now.
Reply With Quote
Fourfeet
Dogsey Junior
Fourfeet is offline  
Location: Devon
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 05:51 PM
Originally Posted by nero View Post
Both methods IMO are to inflict discomfort or even pain, this is completely unnecessary, whatever happened to the reward method of training ?.
For me I could not compete with sheep they were much more fun for me and not something I could train as I could not risk him getting a sheep and killing it or getting shot.
Reply With Quote
Westie_N
Dogsey Veteran
Westie_N is offline  
Location: West of Scotland
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,034
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 06:10 PM
Originally Posted by Westie_N View Post
My god, what a load of tosh! Not all terriers who have never had a "clout around the ear" misbehave and are stroppy little dogs who are so spoiled that they cannot behave! I know plenty who behave with without the use of violence in their training.

I have a Westie,QUOTE]

Quite.

I've had them too and they are totally incomparable to a working terrier. Unless you're seriously telling me you have a working Westie (lmfao) you have absolutely no idea about the kind of dog I'm talking about. Is yours a pack animal? I seriously doubt it. It's astonishing how quick to judge people can be, particularly when they have no idea what they are talking about. Not everyone who owns terriers is about prancing them around a ring or trips to the shops, some use them for the purpose they were bred for.

I have no issue with any of you, nor would I disparage anyone for enjoying their dog for an aesthetic reason. Working dogs, however, are a different matter and I would like to think you would do me the courtesy of reading my post in its entirety before passing value judgements. My deerhounds have never given me the cause to clip them- a terrier with its blood up is a different matter all together.

I'd also clarify, a clip around the ear is a turn of phrase. I'm not suggesting someone literally beat a dog around the head. Is this forum totally lacking in nous? All opinions are valid but please people, drop the sanctimony. Loving animals doesn't require their deification. In front of a top end breeder I gave a terrier a tap on the bottom for growling at another btich and she agreed that it was a sensible response to a stroppy bitch. Hurting the dog is not the point, it's simply a means of putting them back in their box- a gentle short sharp shock.

Punishing a dog is pointless as it is after the fact and is simply cruel- catching a dog in the process of serious disobedience is another matter all together and should be dealt with. If your terrier (Westies are a different kettle of fish) responds to "No little Timmy, please don't eat that cat, you can have a chew chew!" then marvellous. The reality is though that working (do I need to bold that again) terriers are likely to give you the finger and promptly remove said pussy's bowels.

My wife (her login, she simply asked me to defend my views so flame me, not her) thinks I'm being mean but quite frankly I think there is a sanctimonous air about this thread and people are mistaking genuine working terriers with trip to the shop pets.

All the best



J M O.

Good god, talk about patronising. Would you like me to refer to you as Dear Master, perhaps?

You stated, and I quote "show me a terrier who has never benefited from a clout around the ear" - I did just that. My Westie is obviously not a working terrier, however, she is a terrier nonetheless and can be very willful and stubborn at times, believe me.

Do you, for one minute, think that when I request Molly to do or not to do something that I ask her in such a soft way? Like, for example, "Please, please Molly darling, don't touch the kitty cat, come and get your chewy wooey instead." I think not.

Wherever you hit your dogs or have hit them in the past, whether it be around the ear (I think most of us got the hint that it was a turn of phrase) or any other part of the dogs anatomy really make no difference to me. To hit a dog anywhere when it is misbehaving is totally unacceptable, IMO.

Whether a top breeder agrees with giving a dog a "tap" as you call it, also makes no difference to me or alters my opinion, I would actually think less of that person if they felt that was acceptable, top breeder or not a top breeder.

I was at an agricultural show a couple of weeks ago where I met working JRTs. They were very well behaved and beautifully sociable around other people and dogs (there was a Companion Dog Show being held also). They certainly weren't in need of a slap. Perhaps you have or have had to resort to a smack because you fail to understand what makes the dogs tick, and use violence brought out by your frustration at being unable to stop misbehaviours in a more positive way. Do I have to make this part bold?

You call us patronising, I would call you a Neanderthal, chauvinistic bully.
Reply With Quote
Westie_N
Dogsey Veteran
Westie_N is offline  
Location: West of Scotland
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,034
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 06:14 PM
Originally Posted by nero View Post
Both methods IMO are to inflict discomfort or even pain, this is completely unnecessary, whatever happened to the reward method of training ?.
I agree with you, Denis.

Obviously some people don't believe in the reward based method of training dogs as they feel they are not worthy of being trained in a kind way. Sadly.
Reply With Quote
Sarah27
Dogsey Veteran
Sarah27 is offline  
Location: Somewhere
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,087
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 06:54 PM
Originally Posted by Westie_N View Post
Perhaps you have or have had to resort to a smack because you fail to understand what makes the dogs tick, and use violence brought out by your frustration at being unable to stop misbehavours in a more positive way.
I agree - no correction should be made in anger or frustration and IMO uing any form of physical punishment on a dog comes from frustration (or ignorance). I am a CMer and would never smack my dog - and he's a terrier (fox terrier x whippet - you don'tget more working terrier than that!).
Reply With Quote
inkliveeva
Dogsey Veteran
inkliveeva is offline  
Location: Stirlingshire
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,203
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 09:03 PM
using an e trainer though the dog does not connect the vibrate with your hand as they would if they were hit.
Reply With Quote
Patch
Dogsey Veteran
Patch is offline  
Location: Virtual Showground
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,518
Female 
 
02-05-2008, 11:34 PM
Originally Posted by Fourfeet View Post
Where I live that would mean he is always on the lead.
Originally Posted by Fourfeet View Post
Yeah it is, but I like my dogs to be able to run free and sniff what they want when they want , run and play with other dogs.
I think my dog would also prefer a couple of shocks on the collar then free rein for the rest of there lives rather than a boring life walking on the lead. I have only shocked twice for chasing sheep and have never need to again I don't even put the collar on him now.
Originally Posted by Fourfeet View Post
For me I could not compete with sheep they were much more fun for me and not something I could train as I could not risk him getting a sheep and killing it or getting shot.
So because you don`t want your dog on lead, the laws of the land dont apply to you ?
Just being offlead on a farmers land is reason for your dog to be shot, the dog does not have to be doing anything untoward to livestock at the time.
Sorry but your attitude is the height of selfishness and arrogance.
When I lived in the heart of sheep country in North Yorkshire there were still plenty of places to take dogs without any livestock within miles so please don`t try claiming there is nowhere for you to take your dog to be offlead, I`m not aware of anywhere which is like a carpet of livestock...

There are more than enough places to roam without putting your dog at risk from a farmers gun and if you really can`t find anywhere else to go, a lead is a requirement whether you like it or not, so perhaps you need to decide if you should even have a dog at all if its too much trouble to find empty fields or other public places to roam in.
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
03-05-2008, 07:06 AM
Originally Posted by Patch View Post
So because you don`t want your dog on lead, the laws of the land dont apply to you ?
Just being offlead on a farmers land is reason for your dog to be shot, the dog does not have to be doing anything untoward to livestock at the time.
Sorry but your attitude is the height of selfishness and arrogance.
When I lived in the heart of sheep country in North Yorkshire there were still plenty of places to take dogs without any livestock within miles so please don`t try claiming there is nowhere for you to take your dog to be offlead, I`m not aware of anywhere which is like a carpet of livestock...

There are more than enough places to roam without putting your dog at risk from a farmers gun and if you really can`t find anywhere else to go, a lead is a requirement whether you like it or not, so perhaps you need to decide if you should even have a dog at all if its too much trouble to find empty fields or other public places to roam in.
She gets back online and scores...brilliant post Patch couldn't agree more.
Reply With Quote
Moonstone
Dogsey Veteran
Moonstone is offline  
Location: USA/UK
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,421
Female 
 
03-05-2008, 08:20 AM
Originally Posted by Mcpherson View Post
Having had (working) terriers for several years I find it quite simply astonishing that anyone outside the toy or "utilility" breed has never found cause to clip a dog.

Never would I beat a dog to punish it, but please, show me a terrier who hasn't benefitted from a clout round the ear and I'll show you a spoiled dog.

Terriers respond to love and affection but they also understand discipline like no other doggie race. A "no!" to a terrier is important. Try bleating that at an out of control sealie as it disappears into the sunset...For all those who called me a hypocrite- I offer this: Intentionally hurting a dog is rather different to smacking one for misbehaving. Violence isn't the point, it's simply control. Some breeds are naturally placid and will follow command regardless- stroppy little terriers are another question intirely.


OMG you aren't serious are you
I grew up with working terriers, I have owned JRT and never did I see my Dad hit his terriers, or have did I ever smack one of mine places where there was too much temptation, I put a long line on, it is not rocket science.

My Dad still works terriers and if you have an out of control working terrier, that shows bad training on the owners part, not the dogs

You should never hit a dog anywhere, but to hit it around the ear, can do lots of damage to the head and the ear.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 13 of 64 « First < 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 23 63 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top