register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 05:39 PM
IME it is the people who say they are breeding purely for a 'pet' market that aren't breeding particularly well.
Reply With Quote
labradork
Dogsey Veteran
labradork is offline  
Location: West Sussex
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,749
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 05:46 PM
I'm talking about a role for responsible breeders focusing on producing ideal pets - different criteria when selecting breeding stock. Not everyone likes the way show dogs are developing and not everyone wants a dog who's genetically programmed to work all day. Yet they still like a particular breed and don't want to go to a breeder that's focused on all the wrong characteristics (from their point of view).
Breeders who breed strictly for looks with no regard to temperament don't fall into the category of responsible in my eyes. Thankfully, at least from my experience, they appear to be the minority. Every show breeder/person I have met has temperament at the fore front of their breeding program.

Not all people who breed and work their dogs do so intensely. Hard core working dog people often don't sell their dogs to strictly pet homes because they generally don't do well in that environment. People who dabble in field trials (using Labs as an example here), go picking up throughout the shooting season and perhaps have the odd FTW (field trial win) on their dogs generally DO place dogs in pet homes.
Reply With Quote
valandra
Dogsey Veteran
valandra is offline  
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,099
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 06:52 PM
Originally Posted by Moobli View Post
If you have a look at your dog's pedigree, that will tell you what lines your dog is from
But how do you know if they are good lines? Is there a list or something that shows some of the best ones?
Reply With Quote
scarter
Dogsey Senior
scarter is offline  
Location: Glasgow, UK
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 810
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 08:06 PM
valandra, go to worldpedigrees.com and type in your dog's KC name. You'll be able to trace right back for 50 years or more. If there are lots of champions it's a good sign. Perhaps do a Google search on some of the names that crop up to find out more about them. It's really quite interesting - especially when you go back a long way.

I managed to put together a pedigree in pictures going back about 50 years. You can see how various matings changed the appearance of the line.
Reply With Quote
CheekyChihuahua
Dogsey Veteran
CheekyChihuahua is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,459
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 09:00 PM
Originally Posted by scarter View Post
I'm talking about a role for responsible breeders focusing on producing ideal pets - different criteria when selecting breeding stock. Not everyone likes the way show dogs are developing and not everyone wants a dog who's genetically programmed to work all day. Yet they still like a particular breed and don't want to go to a breeder that's focused on all the wrong characteristics (from their point of view).

Some people seem to think that either show breeders or working dog breeders are the 'keepers' of the breed. Perhaps that's the way they'd like it. But it needn't be so.

It's certainly a way to help prevent the gene pools from shrinking to the point where every dog is related to every other dog in the breed!

Oh, at last, somebody that doesn't think that a dog being bred from show parents is the be all and end all of breeding..................hoooooooray!!!!!!!!!! I've been discussing this point on Dogsey for such a time but everyone (apart from a few) feels if a dog is not successful in the show ring, it's unworthy of being bred
Reply With Quote
labradork
Dogsey Veteran
labradork is offline  
Location: West Sussex
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,749
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 09:10 PM
I've been discussing this point on Dogsey for such a time but everyone (apart from a few) feels if a dog is not successful in the show ring, it's unworthy of being bred
But if a dog hasn't proven itself in any way, in the ring, field or otherwise, how is that dog worthy of being bred? how is someone breeding unproven dogs any different to a backyard breeder?
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 09:10 PM
Originally Posted by CheekyChihuahua View Post
Oh, at last, somebody that doesn't think that a dog being bred from show parents is the be all and end all of breeding..................hoooooooray!!!!!!!!!! I've been discussing this point on Dogsey for such a time but everyone (apart from a few) feels if a dog is not successful in the show ring, it's unworthy of being bred
No, not just the show ring...working too if the dog is supposed to work.

The trouble is there has to be a measure doesn't there...a standard that says how good a dog could be, in terms of health temperament and how well a dog can do it's job...If you ignore that, then how on earth do you decide whether a dog is good enough to breed from? I have a wonderful dog here,just fantastic, but he isn't a great example of a FCR, he hasn't enough drive to work and he falls short of the standard in a lot of ways. His siblings however are doing exceptionally well. I wouldn't breed him just because he's lovely...surely that would be irresponsible, even if I had all the health checks done? If I bred from him, then his offspring would probably fall even further away from the standard as no self respecting breeder would use him as their stud, so it would be someone else with a nice dog. 2 generations down the line you have supposed Flat Coats that look like black Labradors.....but it doesn't matter because they're nice??? But they aren't Flat Coats.....because they don't look like Flat Coats anymore....
Reply With Quote
CheekyChihuahua
Dogsey Veteran
CheekyChihuahua is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,459
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 09:12 PM
Originally Posted by labradork View Post
But if a dog hasn't proven itself in any way, in the ring, field or otherwise, how is that dog worthy of being bred? how is someone breeding unproven dogs any different to a backyard breeder?
I've bred my Krystal recently and I CAN ASSURE you, I am no backyard breeder, thank you.
Reply With Quote
labradork
Dogsey Veteran
labradork is offline  
Location: West Sussex
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,749
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 09:18 PM
I've bred my Krystal recently and I CAN ASSURE you, I am no backyard breeder, thank you.
That didn't answer my question. If a dog is an unproven pet, how is it 'worthy' of being bred? where do you draw the line?

IMO, there are so many unwanted dogs of every breed out there that dogs shouldn't be bred unless they are proven.
Reply With Quote
CheekyChihuahua
Dogsey Veteran
CheekyChihuahua is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,459
Female 
 
06-03-2009, 09:18 PM
Originally Posted by Ramble View Post
No, not just the show ring...working too if the dog is supposed to work.

The trouble is there has to be a measure doesn't there...a standard that says how good a dog could be, in terms of health temperament and how well a dog can do it's job...If you ignore that, then how on earth do you decide whether a dog is good enough to breed from? I have a wonderful dog here,just fantastic, but he isn't a great example of a FCR, he hasn't enough drive to work and he falls short of the standard in a lot of ways. His siblings however are doing exceptionally well. I wouldn't breed him just because he's lovely...surely that would be irresponsible, even if I had all the health checks done? If I bred from him, then his offspring would probably fall even further away from the standard as no self respecting breeder would use him as their stud, so it would be someone else with a nice dog. 2 generations down the line you have supposed Flat Coats that look like black Labradors.....but it doesn't matter because they're nice??? But they aren't Flat Coats.....because they don't look like Flat Coats anymore....
Well, my Krystal (who is most certainly to breed standard) was bred with another Chi who is also an excellent example of the breed. Her pups, admittedly are only 3 months old but they are perfect up to now. No disputing their breed unless anyone is blind or hasn't got a clue what they are talking about.

I'm not talking breeding any old pet to any old pet. I'm talking breeding two quality, healthy, great temperament, breed standard dogs and producing wonderful examples of the breed.

And I didn't just breed Krystal because she's a nice pet. I bred her because she is a very good example of the breed and, believe me, I have had many dog people tell me that. I don't need to parade around a show ring for some judge to place her, to know whether I should breed her or not. There is far too much politics in showing for me and I'm not one to keep my mouth shut, so the nearest I'll get to any show ring, is watching it on tv or pc
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top