register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Patch
Dogsey Veteran
Patch is offline  
Location: Virtual Showground
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,518
Female 
 
14-05-2007, 08:37 PM

Deed Not Breed, some common sense at last !

Crossposting this piece, finally it seems the penny is dropping regarding the relevent laws which currently wrongly target innocent dogs and owners instead of the irresponsible elements :

"Police back new law on killer dogs


Move to target irresponsible owners, not breeds, after death of five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson

Jamie Doward, home affairs editor
Sunday May 13, 2007
The Observer


One of Britain's most senior police officers has demanded a change to the law on dangerous dogs so that children are better protected.
The Chief Constable of Merseyside Police - the force that investigated the death of five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson, who was mauled by a pit bull terrier on New Year's Day - said that the present legislation was confused and needed to be overhauled.

Bernard Hogan-Howe said he had reached the decision after talking to other chief constables. 'In consultation with partners, other police forces and the Association of Chief Police Officers, we would now welcome a considered and thoughtful review of the current legislation,' he said.


Article continues

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

His intervention is likely to be interpreted as providing tacit backing for new rules that would target the owners of dangerous dogs rather than the animals themselves. Animal welfare groups say that at present many responsible owners have their pets put down needlessly. Hogan-Howe is understood to back moves that would allow such owners to apply for their dogs to be exempted from the banned dogs list without the need for police or court involvement.
This is likely to be welcomed by the Kennel Club, which has campaigned for legislation based on 'deed not breed'.

The call comes as Ellie's uncle awaits sentence on Wednesday for owning the banned animal that killed the five-year-old. Kiel Simpson, 23, pleaded guilty to owning the American pit bull called Reuben, which was later shot dead by police. His lawyer maintains that a prison term would achieve nothing as Simpson 'is already serving a life sentence' following the tragedy.

The little girl's death prompted a national debate over the ownership of dangerous dogs. It also highlighted serious flaws in the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act - which bans only four breeds, including the American pit bull, and does not cover many similarly aggressive breeds.

The confusion saw hundreds of people in the Merseyside area hand in their dogs to police during an amnesty amid concerns they might be prosecuted. Hogan-Howe said that over a seven-day period in February police received 600 calls and looked at 461 dogs. 'As a result there are now 200 fewer illegal dangerous dogs in Merseyside,' he said.

But following intervention by the Kennel Club, which represents dog owners in Britain, a number of animals that police had classed as American pit bulls were later released and placed on the Index of Exempted Dogs, a register that allows owners to keep the animals providing they are microchipped, neutered and muzzled. As of September last year, there were 1,067 pit bull terriers and three American Staffordshire terriers on the register, which campaigners for a reform of the law say highlights the continuing confusion surrounding the Dangerous Dogs Act.

'The definition of what constitutes an American pit bull is a grey area,' said a Kennel Club spokeswoman. 'Pit bulls have certain traits but in the hands of responsible owners they would not be a danger. The act hasn't worked; it's failed to prevent a significant number of attacks.'

The RSPCA has also been a vocal critic of the current law. Statistics show that only around half of prosecutions brought under the act are successful. 'We find the Dangerous Dogs Act unworkable,' said an RSPCA spokesman. 'We don't believe certain types are more dangerous than others. It's extremely difficult to prove in court whether a dog is an American pit bull. There are only one or two people in the country who have the ability to prove it.' "
Reply With Quote
Wolfie
Dogsey Veteran
Wolfie is offline  
Location: Kent
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,180
Female 
 
14-05-2007, 08:55 PM
Finally!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Mahooli
Dogsey Veteran
Mahooli is offline  
Location: Poodle Heaven!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,297
Female 
 
15-05-2007, 08:16 AM
At last the penny drops!
Becky
Reply With Quote
lovezois
Fondly remembered
lovezois is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,848
Female 
 
15-05-2007, 08:47 AM
At last someone with some sense thank goodness.
Reply With Quote
CLMG
Dogsey Veteran
CLMG is offline  
Location: Kent, UK
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,029
Female 
 
15-05-2007, 08:53 AM
Finally! and about time too!
Reply With Quote
dollyknockers
Dogsey Veteran
dollyknockers is offline  
Location: With the fairies in the garden
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,519
Female 
 
15-05-2007, 09:42 AM

hooray some sensible thinking at last about bloody time too
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
19-05-2007, 04:30 PM
Just seen this, about time! :smt038
Reply With Quote
kristian
Dogsey Senior
kristian is offline  
Location: s,wales
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 254
Male 
 
20-05-2007, 06:18 PM
excellent news! about time someone realised it's not the breed! was reading on a different forum that when the amnesty was on in mersyside someone tried to hand their dog in as it was dangerous but because it wasn't of type they wouldn't accept it? wheres the sense in that?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top