Originally Posted by
kristian
Just came accross this and thought it was discusting how they've singled out certain breeds? have a read and comment on it! does it affect anyone on here?
Eleven breeds of dog, including Rottweilers, Bull Terriers and German Shepherds have been banned from all Dublin City Council properties, including houses, flats and estates, with immediate effect.
The council has said it will give tenants an opportunity to rehouse the animals but if alternative suitable accommodation cannot be found for them they will be destroyed.
The council has taken the step to remove all "dangerous breeds" due to the increasing numbers of complaints from tenants and because of the legal implications associated with an attack taking place on one of its properties. The ban initially applies to council housing and all public areas within council estates.
However, the council plans to amend its bylaws to include public parks in the ban. This would mean that anyone owning a dangerous dog could not walk it in a public park, even if they lived in private housing.
The council has also written to the Minister for the Environment asking him to ban all breeds of fighting dogs nationally. The 11 breeds are not banned for general ownership in Ireland but must be muzzled, kept on a special leash and be under the control of a person over 16 years old.
The breeds are: English Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Pit Bull Terrier, Rottweiler, German Shepherd (Alsatian), Doberman, Rhodesian Ridgeback, Japanese Akita, Bull Mastiff, Japanese Tosa and Bandog. Cross-breeds of these dogs or crosses of these dogs with any other breed are also banned.
Executive manager of the council's housing department Michael O'Neill said tenants would be asked to remove any banned dogs but if they failed to comply the council would take them away. "Our information on these dogs is that that they can be very aggressive and while they might be family pets, that has to come secondary and would be no defence to us if a child or other vulnerable person was attacked on our property."
Labour councillor Kevin Humphreys said he understood council tenants may feel discriminated against, but he hoped that this was just the first step to banning these breeds nationally.
© 2007 The Irish Times
Hers a couple more updates on it (ccrosposted)
This is from an Irish contact:
The first casualties of the Dog Ban on so called dangerous breeds were dumped in Blessington this morning. They are a Rothweiler and German Shepherd found in Blessington. (now in Dunboyne Pound at 087 6961116 bor 01 8026676) -this is only the start.
I rang DCC earlier today and the fact that ths bill was brought in without any forethought or planning is becoming more and more obvious.
On radio Newstalk last night the DCC said there was no panic as an appeals board was set up to examine every case. On ringing the DCC to speak to someone this morning , I was just offered a call back. It appears BRENDAN HAYDEN is now the person to write too as he is the APPEALS PERSON.
Also I was told the dog wardens will be calling to seize the dogs, the ban is in place , it started 1-7-07. The dog wardens will operate the job of seizing the dogs, then people can write to Brendan Hayden in the form of an appeal....they will tell me nothing else but that 'this is only new' we dont know yet the sequence of how a seisure will unfold.So will a family pet be taken to the pound pending an appeal??? I dont think they even know themselves.
We need to keep pressure on ...Form link is below for filling in queries.Please do it asap.Forward this en
mail to all you know . This law is unjust, cruel, and unworkable.
Bernie Wright
http://www.dublincity.ie/sitetools/c...mer%20Services
For the attention of Brendan Hayden. Address Housing Maintenance, 1st Floor, Block 2, Civic Offices, Fishamble St
and another email from Ireland...
it's time we started doing things here folks. Make no mistake ... it's the thin end of the wedge. Perhaps tomorrow my Yorkies will bite someone and then they will be on the 'controlled' list as well?
Perhaps tomorrow the loony Councillors will decide that certain portion of society are more 'prone' to violence than others ... and they will be euthanized?
This is the man we need to talk to NOW from Dublin Council - and don't forget he will want your vote soon. I don't think so?!
Councillor Kevin Humphreys
cllr_kevin.humphreys@dublincity.ie
+353 087 298 91 03 (M)
+353 01 667 80 97+353 01 668 68 54 (H)
Then, of course, there's John Gormley - Minister of the Environment who's got the ultimate responsibility.
Address: Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Custom House, Dublin 1.
Tel: +353 01 888 2403 Fax: +353 01 878 8640 Email:
minister@environ.ie
He had the distinction of being the first elected representative in Ireland to have an email address
johngormley@eircom.net
Here is a sample letter I have sent to a number of news agencies and, of course, the above two individuals. Even if you are not in Ireland these nutters need to be TOLD that they cannot take away our Civil Rights ... we can own whatever dogs we like ... as long as WE ARE RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERS!
Please e-mail them with different Subject: lines it'll keep them bemused for hours (and might not do their e-mail systems any good, either).
Dear Mr Humphreys
I have just read the article in Saturdays Irish Times on Dublin City councils decision to ban certain breeds of dogs from council properties. This decision causes me great concern for a number of reasons. How did the Council reach the decision about dangerous breeds? What criteria were applied and who advised them on this decision? Did the Council consult with any of the animal welfare organisations that are now going to have deal with a huge increase in abandoned and unwanted dogs as a result of this decision? Were they consulted as to the wisdom or otherwise of such a decision. How many other options were explored before this decision was reached?
Be VERY assured that I have sent out your decision to all my friends – urging them to contact you PERSONALLY to voice their total disgust and displeasure at your unilateral and illegal decision banning family pet dogs.
The Council, before reaching their decision, should have sought the advice of people who deal with animal welfare on a daily basis. Such organisations are by and large lobbying for responsible legislation that states that it should be dealt with by “deed not breed”. Any dog can have the capacity to be aggressive depending on how it has been treated by human beings. Such legislation would also allow for degrees of offences and remedies required by the owners as opposed to wholesale destruction of dogs by virtue of the fact that they have a specific breed name.
Such draconian actions and legislation that supports such actions has proven in other areas to be a resounding failure. This decision will result in a number of things:
Distraught families and children who have to hand over beloved family pets either for re-homing or destruction with no responsible assessment of the individual dog and its owners.
Irresponsible owners, particularly those who use their dogs for fighting and who breed dogs for the same purpose will most certainly not hand their dogs over and will instead put them into hiding and carry on with their cruel practices even further from the public eye.
Amnesties will be offered by councils to those owners to hand their dogs over and this will fail also.
Many dogs will now be abandoned or thrown on to the streets for animal welfare organisations to pick up and take responsibility for. These organisations are generally under resourced anyway and this will result in the needless cull of many dogs.
The whole area of fighting dogs is a very lucrative one and it will now be driven further underground and people will make even more money out of this cruelty to animals.
In short the Council has been very irresponsible and rash in taking this decision with very little thought for the consequences. The focus should be on the behaviour of the owners and not the dogs and this issue can be addressed with responsible ownership not destruction.
Regards
Peter Banks
Web:
www.IrishDogs.ie
if everyone writes using the letter above ...remember to change the subject line of your email as it could go to spam otherwise !!!!
please guys get emailing these councillors - anyone who is an animal lover needs to stand up and protest to any kind of breed predjudice...
This is just one of the people in Ireland that this ban has affected (cross posted from an irish forum)
I just got a call from a 92 year old woman living in a coucil estate. She is arthritis ridden and her hands are stuck in the fist position. Cant move them at all.
She is the owner of a German Shepard named Helper. Helper is fully trained to look after her. Helper does things like carry the paper home from the shop, brings her post to in the mornings which is also her wake up call, the dog even turns the kettle on for her, and these are just a few of the things she mentioned.
Her husband died in December last year and they never had any Kids, so Helper is the only family member she has left. Helper is 8 years of age.
She was crying on the phone to me, telling me that if this dog is taken from her she will literally die.