Originally Posted by
chaz
I've been thinking about this today, especially when I was walking my dogs, everytime I walk them we have to pass a large dog, bull mastiff cross Rottie, who was brought for a gaurd dog for the owners bikes, this dog use to be walked for about twenty minutes a day
and was friendly to both dogs and people, his walks have now stopped, everytime I walk past him I do wonder whether he will break out, as he is showing signs of severe boundry aggression, to both dogs and people walking past, including children, the dog is always in the garden, and every now and then you hear something like 'shut the **** up' to the dog when your walking past, you never see anyone in the garden, and if he wanted to jump I'm sure he would, and I'm also sure that he would attack, although I'm not sure whether it would be dogs, cats or people that he does, as each one gets a equally aggressive reaction walking past, a law like dogs wearing muzzles might mean that in cases like this the dog owner actually gets done when a dog hurts another one, and it would be easier to be brought to court, and a law like this might really only affect those with dangerous dogs, well hopefully. But apart from that I have some pics of mine in muzzles, to show that they are not bothered, and IMO if someone assumes that a dog is dangerous just because they are wearing a muzzle then that person does not understand dogs, body language gives a much better indicator.
With the right type of muzzles a dog can still pant no problem, the fabric ones are at best useless, at worse dangerous, as dogs can still bite through them, but also can't pant in the properly, so it can cause the to over heat, which espcailly in the summer could be very dangerous.
Can still play with children,
Can still drink,
Can still run and have a good time
And again can still be a childs friend.
So I don't think that a law of this type would be the be all and end all for dogs and their owners, I do believe that owners will be more upset about it then dogs, but that they will adapt eventually, and I also believe that dog owners are currently lucky as to all the places that we have to walk our dogs, I will not be the biggest fan of muzzled dogs, but if dogs end up in rescues because of having to wear muzzles then are they the best owners to begin with that they would dump their pets for such a reason? And there is plenty of private areas where dogs can be walked that their owners get permission from land owners to walk their dogs, and being private land the dogs shouldn't have to be muzzled if such a thing passed, and people who worry about their dogs natural behavior i.e. retrievers could still have the choice to go to these areas, but tbh I don't see this rule being inforced, but it could be mentioned in dog attacks to other animals and people, as the owner would then be breaking the law, and even if its dog on dog the aggresior should still be prosaqueted for breaking at least one law