|
Location: UK
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,096
|
|
I am not having a go at Akitas, but there is no guarantee that a dog will like children just because it is an Akita, never mind crosses which can potentially be less predictable than pure breeds, depending which traits, or combination of traits, they take from which breed.
Eight year old girl needs 175 stitches after bitten by Akita
9 year old boy needs plastic surgery after being mauled by Akita
3 yr old girl scarred for life by Akita
7 year old boy savaged by Akita
or if you prefer a more scientific source (my bold):
Opinions of veterinarians regarding aggression in different breeds of dogs
New Zealand Veterinary Journal
Volume 44, Issue 4, 01 August 1996, Pages 138 - 141
Author: K. J. Stafforda
Abstract
Aggression in 108 dog breeds and six crosses was ranked by 185 members of the Companion Animal Society of the New Zealand Veterinary Association. The Rottweiler and German Shepherd were categorised as extremely aggressive and the Akita, Basengi, Chihuahua (long-coated and short-coated), Chow Chow, Cocker Spaniel, Shar pei and Welsh Corgi (Cardigan and Pembroke) were classified as very aggressive.
GSDs are reactive, territorial, but usually highly signalling (i.e.deter them be it livestock or humans, don't need to kill them!) guarding dogs.
Akitas are determined bear hunting, fighting dogs (I know not all the Akita people will accept that part) and as such are not highly signalling, especially in situations of potential aggression.
Anything bred to stand up to a bear is not bred to be easily deterred.
As a fighting breed not giving away too much gives you the advantage of surprise and lets you get close.
Hence you
can end up with a big, strong, highly-reactive, potentially-aggressive, predatory, protective dog with very low (or none) warning signalling, as is the case with another difficult male GSDxAkita I know.
Even when a dog likes it's own children it may not like the child's young friends, or their parents and households with children tend to have a higher person traffic that most of those without.
In some cases dogs who are very protective of their own children are an increased risk to other people, including other children possibly playing with their child who trips and cries who are mis-read as a threat.
I think Moon'sMum is being very responsible to try to consider all this, and not to "try it and see" because what the neck do you do then if it all goes wrong and someone is badly injured?!!
Look at the photos of the injuries that can occur, these aren't just nips!
She has clearly worked very hard with Cain, and in that process she knows him far better than anyone else on here, particularly those of us who have not met him.
If she perceives a reason to be worried, despite her clear commitment and the enormous amount of love, time, effort, emotion and money she has put in, I am sure she has good basis for that.
It would be great if all problem dogs could be permanently turned round but some are destined to improve with great effort, not to resolve or ever be "cured", so the risk remains.
I have never wanted children so I would never be in MMs position, but I would be confused by someone who did want them who was prepared to take a risk like that with them, or their friends!