register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Brundog
Dogsey Veteran
Brundog is offline  
Location: w
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,769
Female 
 
26-09-2006, 08:00 AM
Originally Posted by Brundog View Post
no doubt - they are fantastic dogs but why take the chance of possibly losing your beloved pet by buying one when you know they are illegal.

Even if I did own a pitbull I certainly wouldnt admit to it being one - and wouldnt boast about it - it would be classed as staffie - I just dont understand folk who go on about "oh yeh my dogs got a bit of pit in it " blah blah blah - they are fools to admit that in this country.

I adore bull breeds but 9/10 times alot of these dogs are in the wrong hands as people who admit to owning them openly are the wrong kind of owners as they are puitting their dogs lives at risk.
Originally Posted by Hayley SBT View Post
so give up on the sterotyping about pitbull owners as if i could own a pitbull without the law threating its life then id be straight in! But i dont need to crop ears or walk down the street thinking im hard, id be blessed with owning the best breed to exsist
my point is Hayley as i stated before that anyone who is knowingly admitting to having a pit cross etc in this country IS the WRONG type of owner as they are putting their own dogs life at risk - and you have to say that most of those people are the stereotypical chav - because a responsible dog owner would not boast about it knowing about the DDA anmd the risk to their beloved pet?? Would they ?
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
26-09-2006, 08:40 AM
In all honesty. I think this is a really sad and worrying time for ALL dog owners and it's because of a few irresponsible ones.

My heart goes out to bull breed owners as you must be more worried than most...I am convinced knee jerk reaction form the government is fast approaching...scary times.
Reply With Quote
Hayley SBT
Dogsey Veteran
Hayley SBT is offline  
Location: south west
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,399
Female 
 
26-09-2006, 09:22 AM
brundog your so right a good owner would never brag about owning any dog
Reply With Quote
1Law
New Member!
1Law is offline  
Location: Derbyshire
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Male 
 
27-09-2006, 04:43 PM
Originally Posted by bullbreedlover View Post
hi dont know if i am of any help but my husband work for the index of exempted breeds, people often get told that pit bulls and pit bull crosses are legal to own if they are neutered/spayed, muzzeled at all times whilst out walking, not to be walked by anyone under the age of 16, insured and registered with the index of exempted breeds, where u would recieve a certificate of exemption. this is all totally untrue. pit bulls and crosses are illegal to own and will not be made legal for the forseeable forture. the certificate of exemption was availble to ppl who owned pit bulls or pit crosses before they were placed on dda and apparently the records show that all the dogs with the certificate are deseased. i dont want to put a downer on things but i thought i had better say something. no1 is blind or stupid and we all know that there are pit bulls in the country, alot are not real but probably somewhere along the lines do have part pit in them. i will put my hands up and admit i am a huge pit bull fan, i own an american staff which is the closest legal dog i could own to a pit bull. im not preaching to u not to own one but so u know if u got one and were caught with it, not only will u be prosecuted but the dog will be destroyed. i dont know about u but i couldnt live with a dogs death on my concience knowing it was because of my ignorance. i hope this helps any questions u may have. if u would like a contact number for the index of exempted breeds to clarify anything i have said please feel free to ask. thanx
This is a much debated subject to which I think i have something add. Im new to this thread community stuff so please forgive the length of this essay!

The DDA and DFRA Litrature seems confusing but really its not. Pit Bulls are not a recognized breed in t UK and as such can not be banned as a breed specifically so they ban all Pitbull types which obviously includes Pit bulls and any dogs that can be considered abit Pit Bull like by a judge in anyway shape or form.

They use the word 'type' which allows them to ban the breed without recognizing it as a breed but it also allows them to reserve the right to seize and destroy any dog with Pitbull type features either physical, behavioral or both which includes AmStaffs, Irish Staffs, Old Fashioned Staffs, American Bulldogs, possibly anything, as a Pit Bull behavioral feature can be extremely subjective and can include any dog with anti social tendencies. Its completely at the individual courts discretion as to what is deemed as a Pit Bull type dog at the given time. Even if the owner has comprehensive papers to show that their dog is say an American Bulldog and not a Pit Bull it is irrelevant information since the court can still decide that this specific American Bull Dog has Pitbull Type Features making it an illegal and so, seize it, destroy it and prosecute the owner for owning a dangerous Pit Bull Type dog even if it has never commited a bad deed. Although it seems far fetched that this could happen a single feature or characteristic is enough to enforce the DDA. DFRA Recommend that people shouldn't own Amstaffs etc for this reason.

This may seem an unlikely event but the point is this, if they want to do this then they can and its upto one man, the judge in the court room. Note that the Judge doesn't have to prove anything at all since he is not dealing with a recognized breed but rather features and characteristics, therefore there is no mileage in proving in anyway that your dog is not a Pitbull.

And so it becomes a matter of opinion and the owner has no defense against a judges opinion. If that's what the Judge thinks then that's what the Judge thinks and you can't argue that his opinion is wrong since his view of Pit Bull Type features rightly or wrongly may be different to yours. The Judge's word is Final. An Amstaff is certainly at risk of being seized and destroyed as it defiantly has PitBull Type Features, and is probably the easiest dog there is to accuse of being a Pitbull Type apart from from a Pit Bull breed itself.

I believe Bulldog Lover is putting her Amstaff at risk by anouncing she has one as it is defiantly a Pitbull type and could or would be considered illegal if she was reported. DFRA says as much in their Literature, although it is still a matter of opinion and only the Judges opinion counts.

Basically your not guilty of owning a dangerous dog / or Pit Bull Type until someone reports you and only then if it is decided that your dog is a Pit Bull Type or indeed any of the other three banned breed 'Types' by a Judge. If that happens the loving family Amstaff becomes a dangerous dog and will be destroyed and the owner will be prosecuted.

Really unfair I know as I am a real big fan of Bullbreeds as well, although I wouldn't swap my Border Collie for anything.

I think the Law in this respect stinks. These are very general, but specific and at the same time vague Laws. They confuse people and ultimatly are bad for dogs and their owners in general. I am interested in any comments apart from ones about the lenght of time it took to read my first ever post?

Thanks for taking the time

1Law
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 5 of 5 « First < 2 3 4 5


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top