|
Location: Co. Durham, UK
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,213
|
|
Originally Posted by
rune
Bernese have been bred far too big and suffer with bad joint problems in back and front legs----so it is no surprise that they have that age. Great Danes 'look ' ok and also have a low age expectancy.
It isn't just how a dog looks---that is a mistake many show people make, it is the 'hidden' problems which are bred in in the quest for a specific look as well.
rune
If you stopped generalising people for one second, when you haven't even met them, I feel you'd learn a damn sight more than you are at the moment.
Originally Posted by
Jackbox
Because most breeders of working gundogs dont bother with any health tests, along with a very small breeding programme.
Yet the show breeder is the one who gets all the criticism..
You only have to look at the diversity of the "springer" small, large, queen Anne legs to point out a few.
Yet it is argued they are a better example of the breed. did you not say, that a show springer could not do a days work, well sorry Pidge, the Springer with the bowed legs and no health tests, is more likey to be the one who suffers with joint problems.
But then the owner who works the dog may not expect a long life out of his dog , and just move onto the next one...
And Bingo was his name!
That's precisely it, the working folk (I'm talking Springers here, not Collies etc) are just as much to blame for the poor health of the Springer as the show types are. In fact I'd go as far as to say the show types are a damn sight healthier!
Originally Posted by
aerolor
Not sure if I would believe that working gundog breeders do not do any health tests. They certainly should and I am sure a lot of them do have health tests done before they breed. The gundogs bred for the Sandringham Estate for example
Have a little look at these test results and have a little guess as to how many of these dogs are working bred.....
Fuco Clears
[Fuco Carriers is not working for me so can't post the link!]
Should I tell you? Approximately 10% of the dogs tested on that link are working type Springers!
10%!!!!! And Fuco DNA testing has been around for a long time!
Just think how many more ESS that are bred are workers rather than show type and it kind of puts it into perspective for me!
So no, I don't think Show people are entirely to blame for a breeds ill health, in the Springer the working type breeders seem to be equally, if not more to blame judging by the amount of testng they're doing.
Oh and if you look at my
website (go to Our Dogs-----Isla-----Isla's pedigree) you'll see what tests should be done on Springers. I looked for a working type breeder for a Sire for Isla's Daughter and I can tell you I found 2 kennels that tested correctly! 2!!!!!!
I blame both sides equally for the faults in the ESS breed, but when I hear people trying to blame the show people it really gets my back up, when given the evidence it clearly isn't the case!
This isn't aimed at you aerolor btw.