Same difference..How do you tell that from a picture?

You cannot see the difference between saying a dog 'looks' unfit and saying it 'is' unfit?

Sorry - big difference to me.

It was said the dog looks unfit, that means the picture is giving the impression to yous that the dog is unfit.....You have only seen a picture of the dog to get that impression, so no..its no different to me..no hands on, no seen movement or anything else...If it 'looks' it or not..what a sweeping statement.

How can you tell it has a thicker coat - just from the picture?

the us sibe is imo 'orrible

Ohh Tassle now your being silly....In the picture the dog looks to have a thicker coat...

You are saying a dog looks unfit, its not doing anything other than standing there - You have not seen it move...

You can hardly compare my comment to yours.

Classic!!!

Just pointing out that the word 'Looks' means something slightly different

You still didnt answer how it 'looks' unfit, or how you could even suggest it 'looks' unfit from a STANDING picture.


Might have been different if it was a video of a dog moving!!

- You dont need to answer though, I already know the answer..You dont like the dogs conformation, therefore it has to be unfit..

unfit to do the job its meant for.... maybe

Sorry - did not realised you asked....but actually - it was not me that said it looked unfit

I said it did not look as athletic as the UK one.

And looking at the outline, it does not seem to have the depth in its chest or the length on it legs. But maybe it is not meant to. I am afraid I am not up on the Husky breed standard - just comparing what I see in the 2 pictures ...on the Look