I think your the one that's struggling to understand

I undertand the point of this thread and the law concerned, what else is there to understand ?

That the list could work at highlighting those breeders who make out their ethical when they're not.

But that IS the whole point of this thread !!!

It is indeed

I read all through this with interest , working in rescue we contact a breeder when we know we are being asked to rehome one of their dogs maybe we have just been unlucky but so far none want to know and to be honest I dont think they care

and I bet at least half of them spout off about how they're ethical breeders and Always take their own back etc etc . These ****** need naming and shaming, it is because of these ***** that ethical breeders get a bad name, it's not fair.

(I must admit though I have been taken a back by how negative the people on here have been towards the idea of this list :smt017 )

I find that shameful to say the least

Its not negitivity i think it might be alot of us know its not workable.

I think it's a good idea,but agree with the others I don't think it's workable.
Some rescues give the Breeders an ear bashing and refuse to let the Breeder collect their dogs.

Good point, as I have also known this to happen too.