|
Location: Sheffield
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,856
|
|
Hi guys,
Yes I'm pretty much with you on it. Judging by this chap's 'character witnesses' I think the press could have put 'set on him' when in actual fact, as some others have said he was defending his master.
The Arbourthorne is rough... I wouldn't live their without a BIG dog (and maybe a gun LOL) and the man in question had an incredibly rough start. I'm lead to believe (from the many people who know him) that from being a child he was homeless and had to fend for himself, he'll do anything for anyone but will also trust anyone and gets a temper on him if he gets let down.
Kids really are horrible in these areas and to be quite honest, I'd be proud of either of my dogs if they were defending me (though I wouldn't purposely set them on someone).
Harry21 - the boy was 12 years old according to the article... at 12 years old he should be playing football and doing his homework, not continuously taunting an old man with threats and physical violence.
Hopefully this lad, and his friends who witnessed it will think twice before disrespecting
anyone regardless of who they are or where they come from - especially as he didn't get into trouble for it.
As others have said it should never have got this far but I suppose he was finally punished in some way for the disgusting behaviour being exhibited by more and more young 'people' nowadays.
(Listen at me... old lady that I am!)