register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Krusewalker
Dogsey Veteran
Krusewalker is offline  
Location: dullsville
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,241
Male 
 
11-05-2010, 10:18 PM
Originally Posted by Velvetboxers View Post
Aargh someone giing to help the NHS for a change????
actually the nhs has done pretty well (spending wise) from major thru bliar to brown
Reply With Quote
Velvetboxers
Dogsey Veteran
Velvetboxers is offline  
Location: U K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,584
Female 
 
11-05-2010, 10:22 PM
Originally Posted by Krusewalker View Post
actually the nhs has done pretty well (spending wise) from major thru bliar to brown
You jest..............
Reply With Quote
lynnb
Dogsey Senior
lynnb is offline  
Location: warrington uk
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 692
Female 
 
11-05-2010, 10:23 PM
I'm not sure what i mean, i told you, i was confused.
Thanks for explaining it azz. It now as clear as mud.
So no-one really knows whats going to happen?
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,570
Male 
 
11-05-2010, 10:28 PM
One thing seems evident... Lib dems have pumped 10 years of modernisation into the tory party in 4 days - nice one CLeggy!
Reply With Quote
Krusewalker
Dogsey Veteran
Krusewalker is offline  
Location: dullsville
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,241
Male 
 
11-05-2010, 10:29 PM
Originally Posted by Velvetboxers View Post
You jest..............
no, its a matter of public record##

twwas thatcher that didnt put the money in
Reply With Quote
Velvetboxers
Dogsey Veteran
Velvetboxers is offline  
Location: U K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,584
Female 
 
11-05-2010, 10:47 PM
Originally Posted by Krusewalker View Post
no, its a matter of public record##

twwas thatcher that didnt put the money in
I'll say nothing more except I work in the NHS......
Reply With Quote
Phil
Fondly Remembered
Phil is offline  
Location: Perthshire
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,027
Male 
 
12-05-2010, 01:18 AM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
Summary:

NO party won the election (they needed X number of seats but none of them got it)

Out of the losers, the Conservatives had the most
Love the wording - I think you're in denial Azz

Imagine how Scotland feel.

In terms of the 59 seats

41 = Labour
11 = Lib Dem
6 = SNP
1 = Conservative

In terms of people

1,035,528 = Labour
491,386 = SNP
465,471 = Lib Dem
412,855 = Conservative

Pretty close in terms of votes between SNP / Conservative / Lib Dem despite the seats suggesting otherwise but Labour were by far the winners.

Problem now is Salmond's SNP 'Braveheart' independence mush can be spoon fed to the majority of Scotland (not SNP) who are against a conservative government.
Reply With Quote
Krusewalker
Dogsey Veteran
Krusewalker is offline  
Location: dullsville
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,241
Male 
 
12-05-2010, 01:19 AM
deleted due to typos
Reply With Quote
Krusewalker
Dogsey Veteran
Krusewalker is offline  
Location: dullsville
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,241
Male 
 
12-05-2010, 01:23 AM
Originally Posted by Velvetboxers View Post
I'll say nothing more except I work in the NHS......
i already figured that one out,

(so does my mum btw)

.....but???
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,570
Male 
 
12-05-2010, 08:58 AM
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
Love the wording - I think you're in denial Azz
Huh? My statement was factual none of the parties won the election. To win you need 326 seats and none got them - that means they all lost and the only options left are what I posted
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top