Yep, all done.

Good!

Thanks to all of those that answered my REAL question

LOL @ Staffy ...... just letting some now not all of us a breeding for cash ...it's not Kathy's fault really she took on a debate from some one else ... i know what you mean perfection is in the eye of the be holder but i have worked hard to have nice dogs i have owned less attractive dogs and loved them the same

sorry thought you hadn't answered me

No problem - of course you cant have owned as unattractive yet as gorgeous a speicimen as Ruby, our Boxer bitch with cancer (ex BYBing brood bitch). Who cares about conformation when you have this kind of face living with you?

trust me i have owned uglier dogs .....LOL
any way you go find me a cavalier

Kathy she needs to be entered in the prettiest bitch competition she is lovely

Ruby's not ugly!! I put her in this celebrity match site that matches your photo to celebrities, and she came out as Beyonce. Therefore, she is gorgeous!

Edited: Thanks Staffy

KathY! Again sanctimonious vile! Yes Ruby is lovely and wwe'd all love our pets nomatter what BUT people want different things, just because type and conformation is NOT important to you it may be to others PLEASE RESPECT THAT!

Now please answer my question - Why do you think that whenever you post on Dogweb you get into an 'argument'? Why have you not posted pictures, got invloved with 'friendly' chat or contributed to Dogweb otherwise?

you said unatractive???? defo not