|
Location: Glasgow, UK
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 810
|
|
Originally Posted by
perrodeagua
Well done, but sorry, I'm another one who feels that the amount she's running is to much for one so young.
I think that for the sake of those that haven't *YET* spoken to qualified professionals about what activity is suitable for their particular dog it might be helpful for you to qualify your feelings by explaining what you've been told by experts that's lead you to think this way. (Not as a replacement for professional advice, but rather to provide all viewpoints so that people can ask the professionals the right questions).
I'm happy to share what I've been told by my vets.
The issue surrounding exercising of pups is connected with hip dysplasia . Hip dysplasia is entirely hereditary, and can't be caused by excessive exercise. However, if your pup has it then the type of exercise that's good for normal pups will worsen it's condition. Avoiding the type of exercise that's good for normal dogs won't make the condition go away - it will simply lessen the damage to the joints.
Hip dysplasia is extremely common in certain large breed dogs. This, coupled with the fact that you can't really screen for it until the pup is older, has lead most professionals to advise against letting these breeds exercise as much as they want. The risk is too high. In the natural world I guess the pups would run free and exercise to their hearts content. The ones with the genetic defect would be crippled at a young age and less likely to reproduce and the breed would be improved. The ones without the genetic defect would thrive on the exercise.
Hip dysplasia can occur in any breed of dog, but it is less common in small/medium breeds. If there's no history of it in a small breed dog's pedigree, then it's unlikely that it will have it. But it's always possible. So some people take the view that it's best just to avoid letting ANY puppy exercise the way mother nature programed it to.
Others (like me and my pup's vet) take the view that it's not in a pups best interest to restrict normal, healthy development that will set the pup up for health, happiness and good balanced behaviour in later life because there's a tiny chance that it was born with something wrong with it.
To give an analogy, my father was a keen (and very good) sportsman until his mid-thirties at which point he developed arthritis. He'd had both hips replaced by the age of 45. His arthritis wasn't due to too much exercise, but rather the damage that too much exercise caused because of a birth defect - a hip joint deformity that simply wasn't apparant until he was x-rayed after the arthritis had developed. A super-fit, athletic friend of mined died at age 18 of a heart attack in the middle of a football game. He had a rare hereditary heart problem. No one would suggest that all children should be prevented from exercising because it will be bad for - even fatal - for a tiny minority with hidden genetic defects. Jeez - most people are concerned about kids not doing enough...and for good reason!
With people and dogs it comes down to intelligent, informed risk assessment. Weighing everything up and considering what's best for the individual rather than making blind, blanket 'rules'. Your vet is the best person to help you make the right decision for your dog.
k9xxb - yes, she loves what she's doing. And she's in superb condition. Every time she's at the vets and they listen to her heart they just sigh and say 'perfect'
I know with large breeds it's an entirely different story. I understand that it's not just a matter of restricting exercise, but carefully watching diet to make sure they grow slowly and finding ways to build strong muscles around the hind quarters without doing high impact exercise? It sounds like hard work!