register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
View Poll Results: Poll - Do you agree you should be alpha male over your dog?
Yes 70 39.33%
No 71 39.89%
Other, please specify 37 20.79%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll - please see pinned thread in this section for details.



Reply
Page 72 of 92 « First < 22 62 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 82 > Last »
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:32 PM
Originally Posted by Promethean View Post
No lone wolf has alpha status. It is an outdated comparative term like '<' symbol, there must be something to compare it to for the wolf to be alpha. Secondly, while you may share the views of Ellis, the rest of scientific community disagrees. As of yet, Ellis has not provided a reasoning or the conditional parameters which make an alpha wolf or dog.

And I am disappointed that you ignore my post on the role of environment and opportunities on the genetic make up of animals. This selective bias is not conducive to a fruitful, honest discussion.

You've also ignored the mechanism of inbreeding avoidance and persist with some folkloric romantic notion of wolf behaviour.
Not ignoring Promethean, setting aside for when I am feeling better ! I think I have already explained I am under the weather. Just started a course of anti biotics today, so I have a whole weekend of exciting reading to do ahead of me !

I most certainly do not have a romantic notion of wolf behaviour, I have seen too much to do so. What I do believe though is that the wolf is the noble ancestor of our beloved domestic dogs and for that reason alone does not deserve the villification, persecution and downright hatred that comes his way ... particularly in your country, it has to be said. Doubtless if we still had wild wolves in the UK we would be just as bad, if not worse, so I am not being racist here, just stating fact.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:38 PM
Originally Posted by Woodstock View Post
Hi Gnasher,

I am not going to fully wade into the alpha debate as I stated where I stood a long time ago in this thread and there are many people making much more eloquent discussions than myself. But I do have two quick questions I was wondering if you could help clarify in relation to it.
You said that about a programme:
"Where there was a lone male sniffing around a pack. During a hunt and subsequent kill, a naughty female slipped off and had sex with this lone male. Unfortunately for them, during the tie the rest of the pack smelled a rat and came to see what was going on ! They were caught de flagrante, frantically trying to break their tie which of course they couldn't do. The poor male was absolutely petrified and was attacked by the alpha male and his betas, but for some reason wasn't killed"
Would you not say this is anthropomorphisation of the animals and their relationships?

And as a side note (although i personally think a very relevant one to the debated issue) you touched on nature/nurture:
"I am a nature not nurture girl. I believe wholeheartedly that ALL pack animals ... us included ... are the way we are because of our genetic makeup"
Are you honestly saying that both mankind and dogs are purely the way there are due to their biology and not in any way shaped by the world and experiences around them?
Yes I absolutely would, but I am trying to keep the thread nice and light by being "jokey" ! I do not want to see this fascinating thread going the same way that most controversial threads do on Dogsey, so I am really trying to not be too highbrow ... not that there's much danger of that, because I am no academic !

And to answer your second question, with certain limitations, yup, that is precisely what I am saying. Our genes are everything. Our upbringing, type of education, the way we speak, all this is icing on the cake. Scientists have now apparently isolated the "God" gene, for instance. There are some people who have this God gene, and they are predisposed to believe in a God.

Man and dog is of course shaped by the world around him, but not in a genetic sense, this again is "the icing on the cake". This is what I believe, what I mean when I say nature not nurture.

[ducks whilst torn apart from all you clever clogs !! ]
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:49 PM
Originally Posted by Woodstock View Post
Sorry another question for Gnasher, hands up in the air I am not a wolf expert hence the question. You said:
"Wolves were not merely hunted by man. They were PERSECUTED ! In this country, they were completely exterminated purely because of the myth that they were the devil incarnate.

Because of this, it is absolutely essential ... and I know this from personal experience, so please don't argue with me ! ... that if you take a very high % F1 or a pure wolf from its mother to raise as a pet, you need to do this well before the pup is 3 weeks old, certainly no older than 3 weeks
"

Are you saying that wolves have remembered specifically that man used to hunt them or have I misunderstood?
Sorry to be a pain! Only just catching up with this whole thread!!

Apparently so. there are breeders of pure wolves in the States who will take the cubs off the mother before 3 weeks. This is because inbuilt in the wolf's genes apparently is a mechanism that kicks in for them to accept as "friend" what they see, in other words, most likely this will be Mother Wolf and Father Wolf. So, the theory goes that you must take your cub before the eyes have fully opened, else the "Fear Gene" for want of a better word will have kicked in and you will never ever get over this. Your wolf will for ever be frightened of humans other than those in his own human pack. The Eskimos believed this, and would frequently take one wolf cub from a den, leaving at least one or two (if there was only one wolf cub in the litter, then they would leave it) behind, at around the age of 2 weeks. They knew that if they did not do this, the wolf cub would for ever be fearful of all humans apart from, possibly, his own immediate human pack.

I personally have had experience of this, and have friends in the States with high % wolfdogs and in one case, a man with a pure wolf bitch who bear this out.

They have been persecuted by man for tens if not hundreds of thousands of years, and have fear of humans built into whatever it is built into ... their genes? Man is the ONLY predator that the wolf needs to really fear.

I do not want to get into an argument about the morality of taking a wild animal from the wild, I am merely stating the facts. The Anglian Wolf Trust will confirm this.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:52 PM
Originally Posted by Promethean View Post
As I pointed out to Gnasher when she did it, you are using circular logic.

The claims of Shaun Ellis are done without supporting evidence. Claims without evidence are worthless.


This is true for any species that lives in groups. We should also not that wolves leave the pack after sexual maturity because they can't mate within their family unit, Oedipal issues do not occur in a wolf family unit.



This is nothing new and we observe the same behavior in human prisons, rats, apes, monkeys,chickens, seals and countries. Aggression/War/Competition for the control of limited resources is common in every species.



As for Alphas breeding, it does appear normal to have a breeding pair but it is not un-known for another female to breed as well. Unfortunately it appears that non of the wolves have ever read any text books, but the great thing about science is that it constantly evolves and what is a hard and fast fact today is disproved history tommorow. As nobel prize winning animal behaviourist Konrad Lorenz is reputed to have said: How could I have got it so wrong?

Hybrid is a correct term for a wolf-dog cross.
A hybrid normally, but not always, implies that the resultant offspring will be infertile. This is absolutely not the case with a wolf/dog mating. For this reason alone it is just not accurate to describe a wolfcross as a wolf hybrid.

If I mated with a pygmy or a Kalahari Bushman, if anyone described the resultant baby as being a hybrid, I would knock his or her block off ! The baby would be the result of a mixed race mating. It is totally ridiculous to describe it as a "hybrid".
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:54 PM
Originally Posted by wolfdogowner View Post
Promethian: If you have ever observed a wolf pack or several, even in captivity you will see that the so called "Alpha" has a very different attitude temprement or what ever you may wish to call it, it is one of aloof confidence. This is not a question of if or maybe, all you have to do is look. As many have done. Including specialists in their field like Mech or Theberge etc etc

The point of debate is that Gnasher says Shaun Ellis claims they were born this way by some process in the womb. I have merely commented that they are born with a set of charachteristics that make them suit this role. There is plenty of evidence (and ongoing research) to suggest that shyness is an inherited trait so why not boldness or any other. The least confident members of the group are very unlikely to become the leader; go look at your example of prisons or any other part of a society.

There is also evidence that some wild wolves will mate very close to their family unit, usually where they are reduced in numbers.

Good point about the downsize in numbers Wolfdog. I am still not convinced that the siblings in a pack would allow their dam and sire to mate with them, but I do remember reading somewhere that inbreeding at this level WILL occur during dire straits, such as a dramatic reduction in numbers.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:57 PM
Originally Posted by Lucky Star View Post
Apologies - I have just gone back through the thread and realised that Wys had already posted a link to this article - and some other excellent links too (sorry Wys):

http://www.dogsey.com/showthread.php...55#post1676955
Thanks LS, more links to read ! I am especially interested in David Mech because he performed such a massive vote face, that I am wondering how anything he says can be trusted. However, I will withold my judgement until I have read up on him. Certainly I remember 15 years ago, when we were doing our researches prior to getting Hal, David Mech held very different views from he seems to do now, which makes me suspicious of his motives.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 07:59 PM
Originally Posted by Promethean View Post
wolfdogowner

That's not true. It is actually difficult to determine the identity of the breeding male - your alpha. So much so that Mech writes in his book "The Wolf" that when he studied the wolves of Isle Royal he had a difficult time determining the hierarchy. Again, the facts refute the claims you, Ellis and others make.

The point is that not only is Shaun Ellis wrong, he is making these unsubstantiated claims. All he would have to do to prove his ideas is track a biochemical marker, tie it to "alphaness" and show that there is a strong correlation between the two that in a way that eliminates environmental influences.... HE CAN"T.

Second point is that thanks if we understand Hardy-Weinberg and genetic drift and as you say only alphas get to mate then we would see a shift in as the frequency of Shyness increase in the population thanks to the successful breeding of alpha wolves. Even if I knew nothing about wolves, a mathematical modeling of gene frequency in a population would lay this claim to waste.

And yes, where there are no available mating partners, all animals resort to inbreeding. This in not news nor is it relevant.
Apparently wolves will ONLY inbreed in very exceptional circumstances. The inhibition to do so apparently lies with the siblings, rather than the dam and sire.
Reply With Quote
Lucky Star
Dogsey Veteran
Lucky Star is offline  
Location: Usually in a muddy field somewhere
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20,145
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 08:14 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
Thanks LS, more links to read ! I am especially interested in David Mech because he performed such a massive vote face, that I am wondering how anything he says can be trusted. However, I will withold my judgement until I have read up on him. Certainly I remember 15 years ago, when we were doing our researches prior to getting Hal, David Mech held very different views from he seems to do now, which makes me suspicious of his motives.
That's interesting to know, thanks,
Reply With Quote
Patch
Dogsey Veteran
Patch is offline  
Location: Virtual Showground
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,518
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 09:39 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
Why ?? ! Have I put my great big fat size 8's in it again ? Do you know something I don't. Patch, if I have done so, I am so sorry, whatever it is I had no idea

My girl was a rescue/rehome therefore a big no-no to breed from, she was also a crossbreed [ Lab x Poodle ], therefore also a big no no to breed from, either reason alone being enough to not have bred from her, my ethics and morals would never allow me to do such a thing regardless of how incredible she was for temperament etc, if I were given a top class quality pedigree purebred as a rehome I would still never breed from him or her, rescue/rehome = neuter as far as I`m concerned

[ apologies for being off topic ]
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
08-05-2009, 10:00 PM
No, that's fine Patch, I didn't know this. I was really worried that I had been tactless to the extreme and the bitch concerned was no more or some such awful scenario !

I don't share your views about breeding from crossbreeds, but I admire you for having those views and for sticking to them, regardless of other issues.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 72 of 92 « First < 22 62 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 82 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top