register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Lionhound
Dogsey Veteran
Lionhound is offline  
Location: Elsewhere
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,227
Female 
 
26-06-2008, 09:53 AM
Originally Posted by nickyboy View Post
im just about keeping up though I dont actually get what concept Im having trouble keeping up with - the fact that a person can choose to have whatever dog they like ?
Of course they can but that may be the reason for so many unwanted dogs in this country

Do you think you should choose a dog on looks alone ? - you aint going to admit it but I bet it was that or the macho image that attracted you to the ridgeback - or was it its extreme tolerance to temperature changes that nailed it for you.
You have no idea why I chose a RR and I find your macho comment slightly silly from someone who owns a staffy and knows what the public perception of them is, I will try my hardest to make sure no-one thinks my dog is macho or hard As for temp - have you been to Scotland recently

Think its very rude to tell someone what they should and shouldnt have well all that person has been guilty of is perhaps not picking the best way to stop its dod doing something.
I have not been rude to sallyinlancs and if she feels I have then I am quite sure she is well able to tell me and not need the resident mouthpiece

So come on in a few sentences what traits put the ridgeback top of your shopping list for dogs as it obviously wasnt its striking appearance or unique look that did it for you?
Of topic bit would gladly PM you but I feel you are not interested without an audience
Reply With Quote
nickyboy
Dogsey Senior
nickyboy is offline  
Location: kent, uk
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 487
Male 
 
26-06-2008, 10:06 AM
Originally Posted by Lionhound View Post
Of topic bit would gladly PM you but I feel you are not interested without an audience
well PM me then

I really dont need an audience
Reply With Quote
Louise13
Dogsey Veteran
Louise13 is offline  
Location: Nr Edinburgh
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,350
Female 
 
26-06-2008, 10:28 AM
Originally Posted by nickyboy View Post
could they be happier?
Happier??? Not sure..

I know they are safe..not running in front of cars getting killed or shot by farmers etc..
They get off lead exercise in my enclosed garden and my enclosed workplace..
They get worked on a scooter or rig, they get cuddles on the couch, they get fed food they like...

Would letting them run about in an unsafe environment make them happier?? Hell maybe it would..and the last thing they think about before they get hit by a bus would be what?? Where's the sheep?
Reply With Quote
nickyboy
Dogsey Senior
nickyboy is offline  
Location: kent, uk
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 487
Male 
 
26-06-2008, 10:36 AM
Originally Posted by Louise13 View Post
Happier??? Not sure..

I know they are safe..not running in front of cars getting killed or shot by farmers etc..
They get off lead exercise in my enclosed garden and my enclosed workplace..
They get worked on a scooter or rig, they get cuddles on the couch, they get fed food they like...

Would letting them run about in an unsafe environment make them happier?? Hell maybe it would..and the last thing they think about before they get hit by a bus would be what?? Where's the sheep?
you said you never let them off the lead

is there no place you can get to to exercise them off lead?
Reply With Quote
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline  
Location: Dogsey and Worcestershire
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 49,483
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
26-06-2008, 10:47 AM
Originally Posted by nickyboy View Post
have you actually been reading this bl00dy thread?

the thread was asking smack or ecollar ? - fair question got my interest

say neither if you dont think either, have a biscuit and stop your grannying.

SALLY HAS NOT TOLD ANYONE TO GO BUY AN ECOLLAR

SALLY HAS SAID SHE HAS KEPT HER DOG ON THE LEAD

SALLY HAS SAID SHE THINKS SHE SAW THE ECOLLAR HAVE SOME RESULTS

SALLY HAS SAID AS A RESULT GIVEN THE QUESTION SHE@D TAKE A COLLAR IN THE RIGHT HANDS OVER A SMACK

the girl started another thread asking for other opinions so why you getting on her case -she aint actually trying to ram them down anyones throats???
Nickboy do you really need to be quite so rude ? I note from some of your posts you make a habit of it * .
Yes I have read all the thread have you?
Sally didn't mearly answer the originally question but went on to elaborate her views on ecollars as I am sure you will know if you took the trouble to read the whole thread.
Sally also seems to put up obstacles to everyones suggestions about methods to prevent chasing animals.

Again if you have taken the trouble to read the whole thread you will note a couple of people have questioned why Sally is continuing with this argument. Either her dog is cured of chasing animals with the use of the collar which she is championing here or it isn't.

(*See your replies in the rescue section thread. )
Reply With Quote
nickyboy
Dogsey Senior
nickyboy is offline  
Location: kent, uk
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 487
Male 
 
26-06-2008, 11:29 AM
Originally Posted by Minihaha View Post
Nickboy do you really need to be quite so rude ? I note from past thread you make a habit of it.
Yes I have read all the thread have you?
Sally didn't mearly answer the originally question but went on to elaborate her views on ecollars as I am sure you will know if you took the trouble to read the whole thread.
Sally also seems to put up obstacles to everyones suggestions about methods to prevent chasing animals.

Again if you have taken the trouble to read the whole thread you will note a couple of people have questioned why Sally is continuing with this argument. Either her dog is cured of chasing animals with the use of the collar which she is championing here or it isn't.
i have read the whole thread - been reading every post from the start. I think Sallys ellaborations come across as a combination of trying to explain herself and defend her interpretations, I dont think shes tried to put anyone in their place, just comes across someone trying to defend herself against a number of people on this thread.
She said she used it once and I understand her frustrations at repeatedly trying to explain that it was on someones advice ( before your other thread ) and that she beleived it had provided results. I think shes conducted herself quite well on this thread as all the emotive people have tried to create all sorts of unfair images of her and the consequences of her actions.

As for being nasty, dont confuse that with being able to think for myself and disagree with you or the tone of your thread input.

Ive seen much nastier things said on these threads than anything ive said

you know stuff like ' people with degenerative diseases shouldnt breed dogs' ....

or ' people who got their dog from a freead arent fit to keep them'

thats much nastier than telling someone to have a biscuit - wouldnt you agree?
Reply With Quote
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline  
Location: Dogsey and Worcestershire
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 49,483
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
26-06-2008, 11:46 AM
Originally Posted by nickyboy View Post
i have read the whole thread - been reading every post from the start. I think Sallys ellaborations come across as a combination of trying to explain herself and defend her interpretations, I dont think shes tried to put anyone in their place, just comes across someone trying to defend herself against a number of people on this thread.
She said she used it once and I understand her frustrations at repeatedly trying to explain that it was on someones advice ( before your other thread ) and that she beleived it had provided results. I think shes conducted herself quite well on this thread as all the emotive people have tried to create all sorts of unfair images of her and the consequences of her actions.

As for being nasty, dont confuse that with being able to think for myself and disagree with you or the tone of your thread input.

Ive seen much nastier things said on these threads than anything ive said

you know stuff like ' people with degenerative diseases shouldnt breed dogs' ....

or ' people who got their dog from a freead arent fit to keep them'

thats much nastier than telling someone to have a biscuit - wouldnt you agree?
Nickyboy if you have concerns with any posts being 'nasty' please use the report post button .

No I am not confusing anything , neither am I miss quoting anything or trying to associate someone with statements they did not make as I think you are trying to do here. You better check again I have never ever mentioned degerative diseases on any of the forums.
Also please stay on topic.
Reply With Quote
nickyboy
Dogsey Senior
nickyboy is offline  
Location: kent, uk
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 487
Male 
 
26-06-2008, 11:58 AM
Originally Posted by Minihaha View Post
Nickyboy if you have concerns with any posts being 'nasty' please use the report post button .

No I am not confusing anything , neither am I miss quoting anything or trying to associate someone with statements they did not make as I think you are trying to do here. You better check again I have never ever mentioned degerative diseases on any of the forums.
Also please stay on topic.
dont need to tell tales or report people

youre right, you said the other silly quote - which i deemed as being nasty and insulting to anyone who got their first dog that way.

The degenerative comment was made by someone else on this thread who likes to give her opinion as much as I do, did you think it was nasty when you read it - it was involved on a thread you were participating on and made your own nasty comment on above?

or is nasty just when i pull you up on something when trying to stick up for someone on a thread ?
Reply With Quote
sallyinlancs
Dogsey Senior
sallyinlancs is offline  
Location: n/a
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 912
Female 
 
26-06-2008, 01:18 PM
I AM trying all the other methods of training that have been suggested to me (apart from going to the training centre that I can't afford). I DO keep my dog on a lead anywhere near livestock. So far, none of the other methods have shown anything like the success of the one e-collar session I had.

I know the tree blowing over scenario was extreme - but anything COULD happen - I could fall over while out on a walk and lose the lead - Some spiteful eejit could get into my garden and set my dogs loose (as happened recently to someone I know). I want to be prepared just in case something happens that ends up with my dog being loose. I am doing all I can to make sure that he DOESN'T, but if he WERE to get loose, I'd prefer to have the off-lead control I need to ensure his safety.

In my mind, the e-collar DID work - no it hasn't solved the problem, but I don't think ANY method would totally solve the problem in one 20 minute session. It's interesting to note here that often the same people who say I should be trying other methods and giving them more time (which I AM), are the same ones who say the e-collar obviously doesn't work even though I only tried it once for 20 minutes!!

I DID research my breed before buying. I know MANY NI owners whose dogs have no problems around livestock. Indeed Spike only developed the problem after he had learnt the thrill of the chase - before that he was fine OFF-LEAD and NEAR livestock. He has never shown aggression to livestock (even when he had a sheep cornered) and I believe his behaviour has become a compulsive obsession.

I have asked my local farmer if he'd be willing to let me train Spike near livestock or if he knew of anyone else who would and had a negative response. On looking further afield, the only farmer I could find who was willing, was the one who would let me try with the e-collar.

I am not cowardly. I am not cruel. I am not stupid. I would not do anything that I believe would hurt my dogs or make them fearful. I am trying to weigh up the risks of my dog becoming loose, against effective methods of training him to respond to me while he is off lead and near livestock. I believe it is in Spike's best interest for me to HAVE that control, if I can achieve it.

I am trying everything I can to achieve this and so far the e-collar has shown the best results. I am satisfied that the session had a POSITIVE effect on my dog and my control over him. Before trying the e-collar, I was dead against them and I went along to the session telling the trainer that I was very doubtful that I would actually use one and that there was NO WAY I would let it anywhere near Spike unless I was satisfied first that it would not hurt him, or make him fearful.

Any 'eleborations' I have made about my own experience with the e-collar and trying to train Spike out of livestock chasing, have been made in response to questions put to me here, while I have been trying to defend my opinion that in SOME circumstances, an e-collar is NOT as bad as some instances of smacking.
Reply With Quote
Meg
Supervisor
Meg is offline  
Location: Dogsey and Worcestershire
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 49,483
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
26-06-2008, 01:32 PM
Originally Posted by nickyboy View Post
dont need to tell tales or report people

youre right, you said the other silly quote - which i deemed as being nasty and insulting to anyone who got their first dog that way.

The degenerative comment was made by someone else on this thread who likes to give her opinion as much as I do, did you think it was nasty when you read it - it was involved on a thread you were participating on and made your own nasty comment on above?

or is nasty just when I pull you up on something when trying to stick up for someone on a thread ?
Nickyboy, yet again you have misquoted one of my post.

I am happy to debate with most people but not someone who swears at me, is rude and repeatedly misquotes my posts.
In future if you refer to any of my post do not expect a response it will be ignored.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 51 of 64 « First < 41 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 61 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top