|
Location: LIVERPOOL UK
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 367
|
|
...and so, once again the old topic of so called designer dog raises its head on dogsey.
One thing I have noticed from reading all of these threads when they are started is that an awful lot of the comments against deliberate cross breedings state that it is the 'silly name' or the price that makes them so angry, and that people are stupid for forking out what is not a proper recognised breed or a pedigree.
There also tends to be a suggestion that they are bought because really people dont know what they are buying or how to look after them.
The quotes below are just an example -
Originally Posted by
lilypup
There is no reason at all behind the latest influx other than silly names and silly prices.
I'm curious as to why people are so keen to buy dogs of this type and in particular first time dog owners seem to be ultra keen to grab themselves a 'designer' dog.
I have 2 friends with 'poos' and I have spoken to both of them at length about puppy farms, the dangers of breeding 2 unknown dogs, the huge amount of grooming needed to care properly for these dogs etc.
Both people have said they wouldn't buy another. They would go to rescue. Both were unaware of so many issues and were not told by either breeder about how high maintenance their dog would be.
As a proud and loving owner to a beautiful cockerpoo pup I would just like to say that I deliberately set out to find a breeder of these when my dog died, having seen one a couple of years ago.
Why do some people want only GSD's, or Boxers or Rottiie's? Non of these dogs would be number 1 on my 'dog to get' list, although they are great dogs. A lot of this is personal preference and there is no right or wrong in it.
I could quite easily have gone to the local rescue - there is one just up the road from me - but I chose not to. I have had rescue dogs before, but this time I decided to do this.
My last dog, a rescue dog, cost me £45 to buy, Bobby has cost me considerably more, but already he as shown himself to have a beautiful temperament and I am seriously considering getting him a brother to play with next year - from the same breeder.
I know about puppy farms and how horrible they are and they should all be shut down in my opinion. However, a lot of puppy farm businesses breed pedigree dogs in large numbers, so to link them to people having 'poos as if they are the sole reason for their existence is disingenuous in my opinion.
I don't know how the people mentioned in the post above bought their poos, but surely the same safeguards when buying a pup from a breeder should apply, regardless of whether you consider the dog a proper pedigree or a so called 'designer' dog. I researched as much as I could about this 'breed', as I would have done if I was going to buy a poodle or anything else.
I have read lots of threads on here and elsewhere about people either breeding pedigrees dogs who have not done the proper checks, or people who have bought a pedigree and the breeders haven't done health checks, buyers haven't seen the parents etc.
Surely people have to have a bit of commonsense and take responsibility for what they are deciding, and that goes for whatever type of dog you are getting.?
My pup is nearly 5 months, I groom him once a week. Will this change as he gets older - probably. Will he need to go to the pooch parlour regularly, - yes but do Samoyeds groom themselves? GSD's never moult and need a groom, could a long haired rescue dog with unknown parentage not grow into a so called high maintainence dog?
Believe it or not, it is possible for normal sensible people to make an informed decision to go and get a cockerpoo/labradoodle or whatever, help it grow into a beautiful loving dog and look after it properly.