|
|
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
|
13-05-2010, 07:52 PM
Originally Posted by DevilDogz 
Yes very much so! ( amoung other stuff )...isnt a breeder that tests your idea of a decent, ethical breeder?
Especially in BC's!
rune
|
|
|
Location: UK
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,891
|
13-05-2010, 07:55 PM
Originally Posted by rune
I know several who test that I don't consider good breeders.
Especially in BC's!
rune
|
|
|
|
Location: UK
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,891
|
13-05-2010, 07:57 PM
Originally Posted by rune
BTW---I have one health tested dog and he has had more health problems (and other problems)than any of the others put together! He came from a good breeder and I bought him for his colour.
rune
|
|
|
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
|
13-05-2010, 07:59 PM
Originally Posted by rune
You have rather extended the bad breeder scenario -----not all bad breeders are puppy farms.
You can 'wow' all you like, if I wanted a specific colour and could only get it from someone I considered to be a bad breeder I would still have it. It isn't the only thing I would look at but its an important one for me.
BTW---breed standards wouldn't bother me at all, in fact sub standard might well be a better option in some breeds!
rune
|
|
|
|
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
|
13-05-2010, 08:00 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox
And thats why people will continue to breed "rare" colours because there is always someone willing to over look the ethics of the breeder and pay the price and ignore all the rest!!
rune
|
|
|
Location: Orkney Islands, Scotland
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,963
|
13-05-2010, 08:02 PM
Snorri
|
|