|
Location: n/a
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,459
|
|
Originally Posted by
Jackbox
Good post Becky, shame something that was thought o be a good thing, escalates into a money making scheme by the unscrupulous..
I think some peopel are very clear in their thoughts.
Re Chi`s.... Is it true they only breed from the "big" ones (non standard) because the standard are to small to breed from.... an why would that be.. because they have huge heads, unable to whelp properly.... do they not even the best of them have bulging eyes...
How can that be confused with disagreeing with designer breeding.
one is doing it for money the other is breding to a standard, that if whelping is problem, needs to be looked at , and standard changed .
Still not sure where your two comments are connected.
You dont have to X a Chi to fix any problems,, jus tweak the standard of the existing dogs
I think you are somewhat confused Jackbox. The Chis I have bred from ARE of breed standard size (up to six pounds). I think you might be talking of a thread a while back when someone was discussing that the show breeders often don't use their show dogs for breeding but use the larger girls of the litter to make breeding more safe (surely nobody can be slated for that
). At that time, I believe the smaller Chis did better in the show ring. However, I think that the light is finally being seen, because apparently (so I hear) the larger (still up to 6lbs) are supposed to be appreciated for their size rather than penalised in shows.
If you look at Chi info, Chis eyes should NEVER be bulging but more large and saucer-like. Bulging eyes are not part of the breed standard. I have seen the type Chi you are talking of, where the eyes are literally bulging from the skull. That is not breed standard. That is poor breeding and I should hope never to produce this kind of problem, as I would not breed a dog with bulging eyes (in fact I don't own one) as that would be irresponsible
So, in fact the Chi standards don't need tweeking at all. It's just that people that slate certain breeds need to get their facts right and not assume that every Chi has certain traits. There are poorly bred dogs of all breeds. That doesn't make the breed "painful" to look at as I think was suggested on another thread.
I'm all for crossbreeds if there is something to offer, as in crossing two breeds makes a perfectly healthy dog for a good reason. However, research needs to be done to make sure this is viable. Not just crossing any mish mash of breeds and attaching a ridiculous price tag.
I saw an internet advert for Chihuahua x Pomeranian pups recently, which were ridiculously priced for mongrels. The advert actually said that they were deliberate crosses to make the pups healthy
So you see, when people read threads on Dogsey where people are saying that Chis look "painful" and have "bulging eyes" and so on, the wrong message is being sent. Do you see what I'm getting at
Properly bred Chis are happy, healthy little dogs that live long painfree lives. Not the mutants some make them out to be because they haven't taken time to research the breed properly.
I think this picture says a thousand words:
My Krystal (to breed standard) with her two pups (both to breed standard):
*Cheeky stands down from her soapbox*