register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:13 PM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
OP (Gnasher) Is there any point to this thread remaining open? Would you rather it closed?

Everyone else - same question, is there anything positive that can come out of this thread now?
Azz, can I answer when I have waded through all the latest posts?

From my point of view, I am trying to present the picture that e collars are not:

1. Painful (having used it now on myself).
2. In extreme situations, with extreme cases, definitely have a use.

If I have failed to do this, and I believe I have, then I have clearly failed.

From my point of view, using an e collar has been revolutionary and an outstanding success - for Ben. He is just a different dog, he is happier, calmer, thrilled to please and has lost none of his joie de vivre in the process. I would prefer that you do not close this thread, because I am hoping that as time goes by, I will be proved right. If I am proved wrong, then I will be the first to say it has been a disaster - either way, then a purpose will have been achieved - pro or anti e-collar.
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:14 PM
Originally Posted by TabithaJ View Post
First you acknowledged the e collar DOES HURT - now you state it does not.

First you said there are trigger happy farmers nearby - then you denied that and said there were not, now suddenly there are again...


If you had actually had the integrity to try the damn e collar on yourself, I probably would have had a bit of respect for you.

As it is, you didn't even have the decency to try it properly. Why not - maybe because deep down you know it would hurt...?
I have tried the collar on myself, and it does not hurt

An d I have never said any other than that the farmers round here tend to be trigger happy.
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,574
Male 
 
06-03-2011, 08:16 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
Azz, can I answer when I have waded through all the latest posts?
Ok, we'll review in a few days.
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:18 PM
Originally Posted by Tassle View Post
I take a huge issue with that.
It is such an unfair comment to make.

You are on here stating that you feel you training method has worked for an extreme case - from what you have told me I disagree - I do not feel Ben is an extreme case at all - but that aside -

While you continue to defend your chosen method - you will happily knock others who choose to be 100% responsible by allowing their dogs free running in a controlled way.

I ask again - what is so wrong with allowing a dog 50ft of trailing lead? Thus making 100% sure that the dog is under control but being able to behave like a dog.
Tassle, come on, you know that Ben IS an extreme case, and 50 miles of lead would not ensure that Ben was under control. Well, maybe I slightly exaggerate there, but why should I want to restrict him to 50 feet, when now I can allow him the freedom to go where he wants within my line of sight - 200 yards? - safe in the knowledge that I can now call him back to me whenever I want?

Please be happy for us - we have all 3 of us just had the most amazing day since Ben first came to live with us, I am so happy, he has just been a star, I cannot say any more than that. I have not felt this happy since I lost my Hal, Hal will be proud of his boy
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:21 PM
Originally Posted by Minihaha View Post
I agree with Tassle and all those who would like to see the thread closed. As far as I can see it serves no useful purpose.
Help and advice was not not requested here and was clearly not wanted. In fact I have misgivings about the real reason the thread was started at all.

Sorry, I could not take seriously any 'updates' from someone who has previously admitted on a number of occasions (including in this thread) to stretching the truth and a person who clearly has so little understanding of dogs that any behaviour Ben displays could be misinterpreted or tailored to suit the TSs original pronouncements anyway.

I am saddened and sickened that anyone can take on an abused dog and treat it with such a lack of consideration.

Apologies if my being candid upsets anyone but Admin did ask for opinions. I just wish if people can't be bothered to take the time and trouble to understand and make allowances for the dogs they accept into their 'care' they would leave them alone.
Quite true Mini, no advice was sought, I was trying to illustrate that e collars are not the monsters they are portrayed to be.

Your candidness certainly does not upset me at all, you are entitled to your opinion, and you have stated it. That's fine.

I "can be bothered" to take the time and trouble to make allowances for Ben. We have gone through hell and high water with him for the last 6 months, and I am delighted to be able to say I would do the same thing all over again, he is a wonderful dog, a true chip off the old block, and I have had the best day with him today since we got him. At last, at last, I can truly say I am as proud of my Ben as I was of his father Hal.
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:24 PM
Originally Posted by Ben Mcfuzzylugs View Post
hmm well inital thought was gnasher has been given some amazing advice and offers of help
People have explained why they are so concerned
but she really isnt listning or answering anyones questions really
BUT she is going to keep on about her great recal (until it suddenly fails) and new people might stumble on a thread and not have all the facts and think she has a great methods and then try it
Hopefully they would be able to read here why we feel this is not a fix but a dangerous temp fix



I actually find the slendertone very sore on higher settings - it feels like it is burning my skin (it prob is)
and electric fences are very painful to me - bad enought with my hand there where I can move it away and control it - but round my neck where I have no idea why its happening and cant stop it

as for 'yelped in surprise' purlease!! yes he was surprised he got hurt - life is full of surprises and my dogs have never yelped when surprised, they yelp when something hurts them



Yup I would say most of us manage our dogs based on how we know them and the situations
Ben is better offlead than Mia - so there are places I can let him off before I let her off
But will his recal ever be enough that I would trust him offlead beside a busy road - nope I could never say 100% that a cat running out infront of him his recal would be THAT good
I will ALWAYS condem them to be onlead in places where there is danger
and find SAFE places to let them offlead
Absolutely not! You clearly do not understand how Slendertone works. It works by making your muscles contract through static impulse. No way can it BURN!! That is utter NONSENSE!!

And I quite agree with your last paragraph! Ben AND Tai ALWAYS go on to their leads when we approach the road, livestock or any other place where it would not be safe to leave them off the lead.
mishflynn
Dogsey Veteran
mishflynn is offline  
Location: Cardiff, UK
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,033
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:24 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
I don't remember the jelly!! I used mine back in the late 70's - you had to dampen these round plastic discs and strap them to your body via velcro straps. Even on a high setting, I cannot say they hurt, it was just uncomfortable because your stomach muscles contracted so much that it felt like a mild punch in the stomach. The e collar feels like a very low setting of the Slendertone.
Yes that what i had,
in the 90s though because by the end of the 70s i was only 4yrs old, with jelly not water.
Had to stop using it, was very distressing, & horrible.
Didnt hurt like breaking your leg, but i WANTED it to stop.
mishflynn
Dogsey Veteran
mishflynn is offline  
Location: Cardiff, UK
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,033
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:28 PM
As a aside, its taken me a year to get Zolas (a collie) recall as i want it.
Even when her recall was abit sh*t i did have a Change of direction "this way" & a instant distant down

But ive peristed, took time & effort, got to know HER & her me
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,574
Male 
 
06-03-2011, 08:29 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
From my point of view, I am trying to present the picture that e collars are not:

1. Painful (having used it now on myself).
2. In extreme situations, with extreme cases, definitely have a use.
That's a bit like saying getting slapped in the face is not painful. Electric shocks are painful. That's the whole point - otherwise, shock collar users would be using vibration collars instead.

I can't think of any acceptable 'extreme' situation where their use would be justified. Changing intrinsic behaviour of a breed by mental (and physical) abuse is not acceptable.

I'm sorry to say but I agree with most of the posters. If you didn't want a Northern breed and all that comes with it, you shouldn't have got one. I think what you did is cruel, and wrong. I'm sorry if that's not what you want to hear but that's my personal viewpoint. Electric shock collars are pretty much unjustifiable.
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
06-03-2011, 08:32 PM
Originally Posted by krlyr View Post
Personal attacks aside, your arguments just don't make sense.



Why should it matter who is using it? You are giving OH permission to use it, whether it's you physically pressing that button or your OH, you're allowing it, and you should know what it feels like. However, you are a human, Ben is a dog, you have no way of feeling the same level of pain as him



I highly doubt the thickness of his fur makes a difference. Hair is a poor conductor of electricity, the electricity (yes, it is electricity, whether it's "static" or not) passes through the skin, so yet another of your arguments that don't make sense. Dogs have thinner skin than us - it's why minor scrapes and nicks tend to tear into a lot bigger wounds than you'd expect. I don't think we'll ever fully know how much an e-collar hurts a dog because we cannot ask them, but the dog yelped - that is an "ouch"! You cannot say it didn't hurt him, you go on to confirm that the dog experienced pain in your next bit of writing.

It makes EVERY DIFFERENCE!! The contact points MUST be closely in contact with the skin - the more hair, the less contact. Therefore, because I do not have hairy arms, the fact that I experienced no pain whatsoever, means that neither would Ben have done - muscle spasm yes, which to a dog I would think would be alarming and surprising because they do not understand what was happening - hence the yelp of surprise, NOT pain!



Would you physically beat your dog for doing something wrong? Surely the momentary pain is justified by the outcome?

You just do not understand static electricity. The "punch" that a high level of nick from an e collar gives you results in a split second contraction of the muscles - following that contraction, there is no further pain. When you beat someone, prick him with a needle, give him a wasp or bee sting, the pain continues, or can even INCREASE. With static electricity, that is just not the case. The "pain", and that is really not the right word, only lasts for as long as the static electricity is applied


Which you could've had by perservering with positive training, by introducing some consistancy into Ben's life and putting a bit more effort in than you've decided to.



This argument, yet again, makes no sense. If Ben was so intelligent that he could differentiate this in an aroused prey drive/chasing state, why can you just not train him to understand your rule of not going into sheep fields? Of not going out of sight? You have a dog that you argue is very trainable, to the extent of differentiating between someone's pet/livestock and a wild animal, yet claim you cannot teach a recall, it doesn't add up.

You clearly have no understanding of northern-typed breeds

I've used a citronella spray collar before and since discovering forums like Dogsey, I really regret it. I wish I'd had a resource like this back then and had people to advise me of fairer ways to deal with the issue. I certainly know now that dealing with the issue, rather than the symptom, would've worked a whole lot more effectively - as it was, the dog learnt how to empty the collar with a quick succession of barks and then the problem behaviour continued. Dealing with why she was barking would've been a lot more effective. I just think it's a shame that you have these resources and chose to go for the easier option. I have yet to see good justification for using the e-collar other than it being a quick fix in a regime that consists of conflicting messages and a lack of consistancy.
I just really do not know what to say. I have, so far, a very successful result, the proof of the pudding being in the eating. I cannot justify what I h ave done better than that. I have solved a problem - hopefully, it is too soon to tell yet if it will be permanent - and I still have my beautiful Ben, loving, mischievous, everything I could ever want, but with a reasonable recall!
Closed Thread
Page 71 of 83 « First < 21 61 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 81 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top