|
Location: leicester uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
|
02-11-2007, 04:29 PM
Originally Posted by Malady 
No. I didn't say Personally, the majority I knew about, I said breeders in general.
If I was indeed talking personally about my own, please direct me to where I said that.
But then breeders in general, shouldnt they know where all their dogs have gone if it is felt so confidently that they dont add to the problem?
|
|
|
Location: leicester uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
|
02-11-2007, 04:31 PM
Originally Posted by Mahooli
Ithink you'll find that introducing a law that severely restricted breeding activities would never be considered, besides, whose 'opinion' would be used to draft the law?
Becky
|
|
|
Location: Here !
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,681
|
02-11-2007, 04:45 PM
Originally Posted by tinkladyv
i read it that you were talking about your own dogs.
Originally Posted by Malady
It's a case of WHO produces the most Rescues/unwanted dogs. And this cannot be the responsibility of Ethical breeders who know the wherabouts of the majority of what they breed and don't breed nearly anywhere near as much as BYBs and PFs.
Originally Posted by tinkladyv
But then breeders in general, shouldnt they know where all their dogs have gone if it is felt so confidently that they dont add to the problem?
I suppose you would have ethical breeders hunt them down would you ??
Instead of picking on ethical breeders who try their hardest to look after their breed, why not email a few puppy farmers giving them the third degree !!
|
|
|
|
Location: leicester uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
|
02-11-2007, 04:52 PM
Originally Posted by Mahooli
The public are the ones who buy silly named crosses at ridiculous prices then dump them when they don't fulfil their expectations!
Becky
|
|
|
|
Location: leicester uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
|
02-11-2007, 05:05 PM
Originally Posted by Malady
Therefore giving puppy farmers the freedom to choose themselves as capable breeders
|
|
|
|
Location: leicester uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
|
02-11-2007, 05:10 PM
Originally Posted by Malady
I said the following :
Where in that did I imply I was talking about MY pups ??
Of course, but is it their fault if pup owners move, change their contact details etc without letting them know ???
I suppose you would have ethical breeders hunt them down would you ??
Instead of picking on ethical breeders who try their hardest to look after their breed, why not email a few puppy farmers giving them the third degree !!
No it is not their fault, but then it cannot be said that ethical breeders do not contribute to the dog rescue problem, can it????
No i wouldnt have ethical breeders hunt them down..what would this acheive?
This is a debate and that is what we are doing...i thought!, i would be saying things to puppy farmers if they were on here, but they are not to my knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Location: Here !
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,681
|
02-11-2007, 05:24 PM
Originally Posted by tinkladyv
No it is not their fault, but then it cannot be said that ethical breeders do not contribute to the dog rescue problem, can it????
.
The title of the thread is "who is responsible for producing the MOST" !!
The general consensus is that the Majority of dogs in rescues are down to PFs and BYBs as stated about 50 posts ago.
|
|
|
Location: Poodle Heaven!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,297
|
02-11-2007, 05:41 PM
Originally Posted by tinkladyv
Unfortunatly at the moment yes, because there are no laws against them, but i want to see laws that monitor all puppy breeding and all other domesticated animals breeding for that matter.
If puppies could not be sold via a third party premises then Puppy Farming would be considerably diminished as many of them sell via outlets but the trade wont let that happen!
Becky
|
|