register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
RRmum
Almost a Veteran
RRmum is offline  
Location: South West
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,391
Female 
 
21-10-2009, 11:43 AM
Although I don't use it any more - I agree that Dogmatic is the most effective headcollar.
Reply With Quote
John Bull
Dogsey Junior
John Bull is offline  
Location: London UK
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 182
Male 
 
21-10-2009, 11:47 AM
Originally Posted by Krusewalker View Post


i was adding context to your statement they were bred to pull

thats easy to answer..........for the same reason as any big muscular flock guarding breeds......to fight bears
Yes Kruzie, but as the ancient Rotties had the muscular strength and Mastiff like physique to pulverise bears, they were adapted for the man-made task of PULLING loads by our ancestors.

Kruzie - there WERE no breeders in those days, the Rottie was NOT bred, it evolved by natural selection and thus was chosen by man to do whatever man had in mind related to the sheer strengh of the animal.

BREEDING is a modern day indulgence, which so very often pollutes a natural species into some grotesque monstrosity that totally destroys the natural dignity of the original animal.
John Bull
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
21-10-2009, 11:49 AM
Originally Posted by John Bull View Post
We have always had big dogs, mainly GS`s and Rotties.

The dogs have been around 40-55 kg. The GS`s had a very hard pull and when they suddenly took off on seeing say a cat, it was a real job to hold them. We have been floored a few times when this happened unexpectedly.

The Rottie has a tremendous pull of course being very muscular and bred for pulling etc.

Would you all please tell of your experiences and solutions to this tug of war between man and beast ?


We have had Halti, Canny and Gentle Leader nose restrainers which have achieved some success, but with the expception of using harnesses have not provided a real satisfactory solution.

There may be other makes which you know of that perform better. I would dearly like to know of them and your verdicts on their effectiveness.

John Bull
Why not try a little training, the Rotti is no more likely to pull you over than any other dog... one with bad manners might,

Yes, you can use tools to help you if you feel you are not strong enough to control your dog on a walk... but training , training, pays off.

Have to say, we have a lot of Rotties in my area, and to be honest, they ALWAYS are one of thee most disciplined breeds walked on a lead.

In fact, there is a little old lady by me, who regularly walks her very well mannered Rotti, I wish I has some of what shes got , to be able to walk with such a big (pulling ) dog on the lead.

Originally Posted by John Bull View Post
Oh dearer me Kruzie, not again, we must stop meeting this way.

YES, the Rottie was used for a number of reasons - herding amongst them. As we are going back to Roman times, the Rottie variation then was used for PROTECTION, GUARDING and HERDING, mostly guarding.
But in later centuries it was used for PULLING carts etc. - a draught animal. Hence the inherent selected strength of the creature.

It came originally from a Mastiff type of canine that existed in Roman times - you are thinking of around 640 BC to 460 AD. We do not want a history lesson, just to get the gist of evolution and the intervention of man.

Oh by the way - why on Earth should a dog need such a powerful body, muscles and sheer strength for if all it is used for is HERDING ? Come off it Kruzie, ya just gotta be jokin.


thats a good one


Use the PM if you wish to pursue this matter, don`t clag up the thread, there`s a good chap.

John Bull

You are trying to teach grandmothers to suck eggs here I think.
Reply With Quote
Shona
Dogsey Veteran
Shona is offline  
Location: grangemouth for the moment
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,890
Female 
 
21-10-2009, 11:54 AM
many of the early rotties were lean, longer legged, with less bone than the rottie of today

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?im...GB315%26um%3D1
Reply With Quote
mse2ponder
Dogsey Veteran
mse2ponder is offline  
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,890
Female 
 
21-10-2009, 12:01 PM
Originally Posted by John Bull View Post
Kruzie - there WERE no breeders in those days, the Rottie was NOT bred, it evolved by natural selection and thus was chosen by man to do whatever man had in mind related to the sheer strengh of the animal.
Sorry, but that's rubbish.
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
21-10-2009, 02:57 PM
Originally Posted by John Bull
Kruzie - there WERE no breeders in those days, the Rottie was NOT bred, it evolved by natural selection and thus was chosen by man to do whatever man had in mind related to the sheer strengh of the animal.
You`ve re-wrote the hisory of the breed then
Reply With Quote
Krusewalker
Dogsey Veteran
Krusewalker is offline  
Location: dullsville
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,241
Male 
 
21-10-2009, 03:02 PM
Originally Posted by John Bull View Post
Use the PM if you wish to pursue this matter, don`t clag up the thread, there`s a good chap.

John Bull
haha, i never spotted that one earlier

that's me told dad!

Reply With Quote
johnderondon
Almost a Veteran
johnderondon is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,283
Male 
 
21-10-2009, 03:14 PM
Originally Posted by John Bull View Post
Kruzie - there WERE no breeders in those days, the Rottie was NOT bred, it evolved by natural selection and thus was chosen by man to do whatever man had in mind related to the sheer strengh of the animal.
Wild dogs are subject to natural selection. Domesticated dogs are subject to artificial selection.

I've never been floored by any of my GSDs. Where you walking on mud or ice, perhaps?
Reply With Quote
Helena54
Dogsey Veteran
Helena54 is offline  
Location: South East UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,437
Female 
 
21-10-2009, 03:19 PM
From my own experiences, and that's with one big gsd in each hand, yes, they could well pull me over if they lunged forwards, one being 55kgs and the other 32 kgs, and only a few weeks ago, the big boy spotted an Afghan up ahead, the likes of which he's never seen before, especially being a dog which was bigger than him , that has never happened How I held them both I will never know , the naughty one being the big lad, swiftly followed by the inquisitive one who didn't know any better, being only 6 months old at the time, she just did what he did! That was a first for me, but thankfully, due to many years of holding half a ton of horse on the end of a rope, my arms are pretty strong, even though I'm only 5ft7" and 9 1/2 stones!

The point being, IF, they hadn't of both listened to me when I said "oi", "wait" and a quick "sit" thrown in, then the further away from me they got, the more likely I would have been completely buried! That is why, it is actually more imperative to get their instant attention with whatever word you choose to use, mine being "oi" or "wait" so that you then have them completely under control, than any walking to heel in my opinion, I think, but that's just me! Both of mine walk to heel when asked, but there will always come that time, when their instinct takes over, be it a sheep, a cat, another dog, anything, so for me, the attention thing is far, far more important to avoid any accidents.

Never, ever, have him on a stretchy lead if he's prone to zooming off if the fancy takes him, coz I learned that lesson when I first had Georgie and nearly broke his neck! I hate the things with a passion ever since, even though I did use one for my youngster when traininig her up so she could have her freedom, personally I think they're lethal!

My answer has to be training. I feel the more restrictive garbage you put on a dog/horse, the more they will fight it, it's much better and far more satisfying knowing it's you who is doing this, not some piece of equipment!
Reply With Quote
John Bull
Dogsey Junior
John Bull is offline  
Location: London UK
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 182
Male 
 
21-10-2009, 03:27 PM
Originally Posted by mse2ponder View Post
Sorry, but that's rubbish.
Awfully sorry to disappoint you my dear on your rather presumtuous remark, but EVERY living organism, all species - including us and all inert matter on the planet has evolved through evolution. How do you think that an enormous and intensly hot gaseous mass became the Earth we know today ?

All basic species of dogs evolved through evolution and man simply developed what was available at that time to suit his own needs.

Breeders as we generally know them only go back a few hundred years, to be realistic only 150-200 years at the most for breed and genetic trimming, in order to get the variety of dogs we see today.

A few hundred years on the Earths evolutionary time clock is a miniscule fraction of a second.

John Bull
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top