register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Nicci_L
Almost a Veteran
Nicci_L is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,415
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 07:34 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
In fact (and i may be wrong) I cant recall any Staff ever killing anybody?
Dawn.
Don't no one remember this, was sometime last year...

An animal-lover has died after being attacked by his own dog while he was having a seizure.

Lee Scrimshaw, 42, from Sutton-in-Ashfield, Notts, was attacked by his Staffordshire bull terrier while suffering a seizure. Unable to rouse him from his fit, nine-year-old Dylan sank his teeth into his owner's neck. Mr Scrimshaw, who bred dogs, died in hospital after being in a week-long coma.

Inspector David Richardson, of Nottinghamshire Police, said: “Mr Scrimshaw was with a friend having a drink when he had a fit and his pet dog became alarmed and attacked him. It was a terrible accident and as far as the police are concerned there is nothing suspicious to investigate.”

Mr Scrimshaw’s friends said the dog lover was rarely seen without his pet, and it was normally a placid creature.

The dog has since been put down.
But in light of all the dog attacks happening, I think we should all be very cautious regardless of the breed and wether they are banned or not.
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 07:36 PM
Its ok Anne, emotive subject will always raise emotions!

I dont think I saw anything that said this guy had made the dog aggressive?
Dawn.
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 07:39 PM
Originally Posted by Nicci_L View Post
Don't no one remember this, was sometime last year...



But in light of all the dog attacks happening, I think we should all be very cautious regardless of the breed and wether they are banned or not.

Yes I do recall that, however you could say the seizure triggered the dogs attack, and it had no history of any behaviour problems previously. We are led to believe at present that this attack was unprovoked and the dog did have a history of nasty behaviour.
Dawn.
Reply With Quote
Shona
Dogsey Veteran
Shona is offline  
Location: grangemouth for the moment
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,890
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 07:50 PM
Originally Posted by AnneUK View Post
I know pounds that rehome PB's saying they're staffy x's but to openly admit it!!! it's laughable
Not to the person that bought it though! they had no idea about the DDA or what the legal implications would be I must admit I thought it a bit strange but a family member helps out walking the dogs and she also said its a pit x
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 07:58 PM
I still think this is a worrying time for all dog owners regardless of breed. A couple of people mentioned to me today (knowing me as mad dog woman of course!) that I must be concerned as the latest spate of attacks would make people more anti dog than usual... (they said it nicely, in a concerned way for me i hasten to add).
Yes, it's more worrying for owners of bull breeds, but these are sad and sorry times for all dog owners as the UK is becoming more anti dog as each day passes.
Reply With Quote
teenytiny
Almost a Veteran
teenytiny is offline  
Location: S.W London
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,309
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 08:14 PM
Originally Posted by Nicci_L View Post
I own Bull Breeds, 2 Am Bulldogs, Olde Tymes - a Bullmastiff, Dogue De Bordeaux and a Staffy X, the day could possibly dawn that 3 of my own dogs could be ceased and destroyed under this act, yours could too, and you agree with this? And before you say 'stop talking rubbish' as I mentioned in a previous post some strains of AB could possibly be deemed 'as of Pitbull type' that goes for numerous Stafford crosses across the UK..I knew a man whose Lab cross was ceased because the dog fell under that catchment (yet there was no Pitty in her). Every single Bull Breed owner in the UK is walking on very thin ice at the moment (That goes for the responsible and irresponsible owners, it applies to us all) please do not play into the hands of the media, because the day WILL come sooner than we think.
Loving, loyal family dogs could get ceased because of this terrible mess and every Bull Breed that is loved and trained properly by loving owners should not have to suffer because of this.
I said I agreed with all the dogs being ceased and destroyed, meaning all the dogs that were taken from the flat where this man is breeding pitbulls. The dogs taken were all pitbulls and were being bred for dog fighting. I know it's not the dogs faults they were being bred as fighting dogs, but at the end of the day they were of vicious nature and most importantly ILLEGAL.

That is the ONLY reason I said I was glad the dogs were ceased...
Reply With Quote
AnneUK
Almost a Veteran
AnneUK is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,247
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 08:21 PM
This article gives an idea of the sort of owner this guy was http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100regionalnews/tm_headline=police-quiz-owner-of-killer-pit-bull%26method=full%26objectid=18383565%26siteid=50 061-name_page.html

The 23-year-old, who has previous convictions for drug dealing
Neighbours yesterday revealed how they had warned the police at a public meeting six weeks ago of the danger posed by the "aggressive" pit bull which mauled her to death.
St Helens resident David Lawrenson (no relation) last night attacked the police for not acting on residents' fears, after he personally reported his concerns about the dangerous dog at a neighbourhood action meeting.
Mr Lawrenson, who repeatedly witnessed the banned dog barking aggressively when visiting friends in Knowles House Avenue, said he believed that, if authorities had intervened then, the five-year-old would still be alive.
Personally i think he should be done for manslaughter.
Reply With Quote
Moobli
Dogsey Veteran
Moobli is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 19,298
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 08:23 PM
Gosh - I have read the last few threads and keep changing my mind!!!

I agree with a lot of what Borderdawn says but am just worried for all bull breeds - should they ALL be banned? The how about guarding breeds - my beloved GSD, Doberman's, Rotties etc. Where would or could it end?

Ramble is entirely right - this is a worrying time for ALL dog owners.
Reply With Quote
Mahooli
Dogsey Veteran
Mahooli is offline  
Location: Poodle Heaven!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,297
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 09:07 PM
I think there should be an amnesty for anyone who owns pitbull/pitbull type dogs and have them temperament tested and neutered etc to comply with the current law.
Those that fail a temperament test should be PTS.
I'm not sure what the test should comprise of but the American test looks pretty comprehensive.
Becky
Reply With Quote
Anne-Marie
Dogsey Veteran
Anne-Marie is offline  
Location: Cumbria, UK
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,111
Female 
 
04-01-2007, 09:26 PM
Without sounding like Miss Marple here there are still things that very much puzzle me about this case to which I know we will never find answers.

The main ones are:

1. Why was no action taken against the owner after two separate complaints of it being dangerous and attacking, surely it should have been PTS after these incidents?

2. Ellies parents were quoted in the paper today as "knowing that the dog was aggressive" and it was a "house rule" the dog was not allowed inside - who let it in therefore and why?

3. Why was Ellie alone with the dog in the first place, especially at 3.40am and being only five years old

4. Neighbours are quoted as saying the dogs owner used to take it on a playing field with no muzzle and intimidate people with the dog, why didn't police seize this dog as befitting the pit-bull type unmuzzled in a public place?

Of course none of this will bring back the tragic loss of such a gorgeous little girl, but these questions keep milling around my head.

I too am concerned at the Governments reactions to this, Sid and I have chatted about it too, being Rottie owners and how it could potentially effect us if the rules did change to the DDA.

I guess my worst case scenario would be they ban Rotties and make us PTS Ozzy, but I don't think it would come to that. I would also hate having to muzzle him in public just because he was of a certain breed deemed to be 'dangerous' but of course I would do that if it were the law.

Of course though, it has to be said - if the Government do bring such measure in and Rotties, Pitt-bulls (and various other bull-breeds, GSDs, Dobies etc have to be muzzled what do you think will happen?

Well in my opinion these chavs/thugs who like macho dogs will start buying different breeds instead to fulfill there sad little lives and replace the above breeds with other large dogs such as Akitas and then if that happens a few years hence they will ban them too and so on!!!

I don't always think it is the owners fault that a dog attacks and certainly not all dogs who do attack are owned by these "I want to look hard" types, but so many of them are not trained well, unsocialized and you can see they are accidents waiting to happen.

Muzzling certain breeds or even banning them won't stop attacks believe me!

I would love to come up with some clever answer to all this but cannot alas, but I am so dreading what is coming next
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 24 of 32 « First < 14 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top