register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
02-05-2010, 05:30 PM
Originally Posted by rune View Post
In an ideal world no dog would be rehomed---it isn't an ideal world but please don't justify breeders rehoming old or surplus stock by comparing it to dogs in rescue generally.
Two wrongs do not make a right.

rune
Its not a comparison, its a simple fact the dog cares not whether it came from rescue or a show or pet home, as long as he/she is loved what does it matter.

You (we) are the ones putting emotions and morals onto it.. the dog does not.
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
02-05-2010, 06:02 PM
Originally Posted by rune View Post
Re dogs from rescue being problems.

People manage with the help of behaviourists/trainers/back up from the kennels and sometimes they just put up with it. Often they return the dog to the kennels.
Your point of an "ideal" rescue being?

Yes there are dogs who are obliging and don't have any built in problems but there are many who do.
Who thought any different?

I have never said rescue dogs are easy and I do get annoyed when people say they are.
Who said rescue dogs are easy?

Many dogs are traumatised and the general rule is that you have what is called a 'honeymoon' period where the dog is finding its feet and trying to adapt to a totally new set of rules in new surroundings. The more the dog has been passed around the more difficult it will find it to settle and trust the newest of its owners
That applies to every single dog thats rehomed! All animals will be different when they are settled, its after the initial first weeks or so that a dogs true nature will be seen, often the reason they were rehomed becomes clear then. With regards to a show dog being rehomed, there is every chance it will be used to people, other dogs, used to being handled and trained at least to a reasonable standard. Whilst the fact it was rehomed may not be "desirable" it will probably be a better dog to take on due to its "normal" and balanced upbringing.


Originally Posted by rune View Post
In an ideal world no dog would be rehomed---it isn't an ideal world but please don't justify breeders rehoming old or surplus stock by comparing it to dogs in rescue generally.

Two wrongs do not make a right.

rune
Again you are spouting rubbish again.
Reply With Quote
zoe1969
Dogsey Veteran
zoe1969 is offline  
Location: North Wales
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,037
Female 
 
02-05-2010, 06:18 PM
I can't see any problem in showing dogs at all as long as they're happy, well looked after and get the vet care they need then what's the problem?
I have a friend who shows her King Charles Spaniels and does very well. She's been to Crufts and has won prizes there. Those dogs are her babies and she loves them so much.
I showed my lurchers last year (albeit for fun!) and I was ecstatic when they got runners up in the overall category! I have my little trophy in pride of place!!
Personally though I don't agree with people rehoming them because they're not up to standard. I love my dogs and would if they had no legs!! This is not a criticism....just my opinion so please don't all shout at once!!
Reply With Quote
spot
Dogsey Veteran
spot is offline  
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,724
 
02-05-2010, 06:40 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
Have to admit, I found that a bit baffling , as you say, the message is constantly put out there that "not all dogs in rescue come with issues" yet from Runes,post giving statistics on her experience 2/1 ,she is saying the opposite.which blows out of the water the message that rescue dogs are not all disturbed.

for one Runes experience maybe different to others perhaps? What are your experiences of rescues = have they been easy or hard?

Yet the example you give is for some preferable over re homing that dog to a home that would give it a good life.. but the owner would be considered better because she kept the dog , rather then accept her capabilities and put the dogs welfare first.

That's what I have always failed to understand, when some say, its cruel or immoral to re home a dog that no longer fits your life.



If the dog could speak as some said.. would they say, no leave me in the kennel I have become used to , or please find me a home ..any home..

We have had examples on here, from time to time to time of members who for one reason or another have to re home a dog or two.. yet does anyone say, you should not do that, you should keep the dogs, its not fair on the dogs, they wont adjust in a new home.. ofcause they dont, they say.. you are acting in the best interests of the dog.

So why is it different to the dog that is being re homed from a show home, to a pet home.. the breeder will be doing exactly the same thing as the pet owner how is putting the dog first.

There is a huge difference between dumping dogs in rescue, and a breeder re homing, the dogs dont get a sniff of rescue centres.. they go to homes who have been on breeders lists for older dogs, (believe it or not ) there are plenty of peopel out their who want a "breed" but dont want to trawl the rescue centres, they will seek out a breeder, and ask to be considered for a older dog, .... why is that so wrong.. everyone including the dog is happy.

Yet some woudl be happy to see said dogs left at home all day or in a kennel while the owners are away on the show scene..

In their eyes, these are better breeders because they dont move the dog on, then those who feel the dog has done his job I will retire him to a pet home.

Personally I have no problem with it.. that does not mean I would do it, but I dont judge those who do.

the PF, BYB , and pet owner who dumps their stock in rescue is another matter.

We sometimes get a holier than thou attitude from some, who sit on a moral high ground with an attitude of if you dont do it my way, you are not a good dog lover.

I have said it to many times now, but dogs dont mean the same thing to all people, for some they are pets for others they are their to do a job of some sort. one is no better than the other.. if the dog is well cared for in its home, thats all that matters.. they adjust to new lives.. and forget the old pretty quickly,

To say rehoming an old dog is cruel is beyond me, its cruel if said dog is mistreated, starved or beaten, its cruel if its locked in a shed chained to a post for the rest of its live... I dotn see it as cruel to let someone have it to sit in front of their fire and be the recipient of all the love its going to get .

I could never do it, but thats by the by.
I think thats proberly the difference between show owners and pet owners - I would do everything I could to change my lifestyle to keep my dogs, whether it be stop showing, stop breeding or (as in my case consider my OH moving in until we could fit both our lifestyles and our pets into a perfect home).

To me my dogs are MY dogs and its up to me to look after them not to get rid when they dont fit either my lifestyle, clash with my sofa or whatever - unless it is in the best interest of my dogs and it is something I CANNOT change.

I know for some a dog is not for life but to me that is wrong. You take on a living creature and you care for it - you do not give it up when it has served its purpose, you look after it the best you can.
Reply With Quote
DevilDogz
Dogsey Veteran
DevilDogz is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,891
Female 
 
02-05-2010, 06:54 PM
Originally Posted by spot View Post
I think thats proberly the difference between show owners and pet owners - I would do everything I could to change my lifestyle to keep my dogs, whether it be stop showing, stop breeding or (as in my case consider my OH moving in until we could fit both our lifestyles and our pets into a perfect home).

am a little confused.
Do you think that if some breeders stopped breeding or showing they could keep the dogs there passing on?
If so you have it so wrong, There given up because there no longer able to share there hobby with there owner, meaning (for the more serious showing kennels) that they will be left at home alone for a number of hours every week end while owner is out showing.
Or that there going abroad to carry on showing over there, or that the breeder just wants to let them go to a home where they will get one on one attenion for the rest of its life! I can't say them reasons are all correct because we have never passed on a breeding/showing dog.

But to me it seems some people think show people are not thinking of the dog..Any decent breeder imo would be greatful to a dog for the show success of the pups the dog has had in there time..

Another thing is some dogs might be shown alot as a pup and do well in the ring by the time the dog is old enough to be taken out of pup classes and go in to junior the dog might not do so well because its mouth might have gone of, the weak back end that some judges will not be to harsh about in the pup classes never improved ect..so by the time the dog hits a year old it cant carry on showing.
what does the owner do, rehome the dog to a home that will love that dog for the rest of its life no matter what it turns out to look like or does she keep that dog and have no time to do anything with it because she is to busy working with her showing dogs, and working her daily job, and looking after her kids ect..

Now for me a dog is for life, but you have to remember some people bring dogs into there homes for different reasons..Its not wrong to have a dog for a reasons instead of 'just' a pet..(because remember for alot of people there pets to)..

Its just the same with working, what does a farmer do with a dog that never does well in the feilds.
Does he rehome the dog to some one that will give the dog everything and more that it needs, or will he just leave the dog at home and not bother with it because he is out working with his working dogs.

People might say if a dog is better going to a new home after its working/breeding/showing life then its always deserved a better home thats not true at all..Things change, you want your dog to be apart of your life..but an ex showing dog can not be apart of your life when its no longer showing is it..Its left at home not having a clue why its no longer allowed to get in the car every week end and meet up with all his doggy mates in the showing hall..
Reply With Quote
Petticoat
Dogsey Veteran
Petticoat is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,302
Female 
 
02-05-2010, 06:55 PM
Personally have no problem with showing, my boys are from a proper show kennel, (Codee working). I think if the dog likes it and it must otherwise you wouldn't get the best out of it, then its a great way of socialisation for dog and owner!!
Whilst I could not rehome my dogs, I can see why a show kennel would, if they run on more than the one pup or want their older stock to have fireside homes in their later years, to have owners who are more 'there for them'.
Reply With Quote
rune
Dogsey Veteran
rune is offline  
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
Female 
 
02-05-2010, 07:37 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Your point of an "ideal" rescue being?

Who thought any different?

Who said rescue dogs are easy?

That applies to every single dog thats rehomed! All animals will be different when they are settled, its after the initial first weeks or so that a dogs true nature will be seen, often the reason they were rehomed becomes clear then. With regards to a show dog being rehomed, there is every chance it will be used to people, other dogs, used to being handled and trained at least to a reasonable standard. Whilst the fact it was rehomed may not be "desirable" it will probably be a better dog to take on due to its "normal" and balanced upbringing.


Again you are spouting rubbish again.
It is a shame you can't discuss anything for long without resorting to playground language.

You would, of course, defend the rehoming of dogs not making the grade. After all it is what you said you would do with your young dog.

As I said if it makes anyone happier to think it is the best thing for the dog then thats fine, just don't expect me to agree.

I get another sm for your reply (G)!

rune
Reply With Quote
DevilDogz
Dogsey Veteran
DevilDogz is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,891
Female 
 
02-05-2010, 07:44 PM
Originally Posted by rune View Post
I get another sm for your reply (G)!
I dont get it LOL whats a SM?
Reply With Quote
spot
Dogsey Veteran
spot is offline  
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,724
 
02-05-2010, 08:13 PM
Originally Posted by DevilDogz View Post
am a little confused.
Do you think that if some breeders stopped breeding or showing they could keep the dogs there passing on?
If so you have it so wrong, There given up because there no longer able to share there hobby with there owner, meaning (for the more serious showing kennels) that they will be left at home alone for a number of hours every week end while owner is out showing.
Or that there going abroad to carry on showing over there, or that the breeder just wants to let them go to a home where they will get one on one attenion for the rest of its life! I can't say them reasons are all correct because we have never passed on a breeding/showing dog...

In a word yes I do!

They are given up because they no longer serve a purpose! Like I said for me my dogs come first – before my ‘hobby’ if it was a ‘hobby’ it would not necessitate giving up a living breathing animal to facilitate that ‘hobby’. A hobby is something you do as a fun part time thing. If you have to give up a dog because it no longer serves your hobby – it is no longer a hobby but a means to an end.

Like I said its not for me I could not give up my dogs for a hobby – they are more important to me than any hobby could ever be.

If my ‘hobby’ was detrimental to my dog either before or after they useable lifetime my dogs would come far far away above my hobby. Obviously some people put their hobby before their pets – that’s up to them! Just not for me, my dogs would come first before any hobby of mine – INCLUDING FOOTBALL !






Originally Posted by DevilDogz View Post
People might say if a dog is better going to a new home after its working/breeding/showing life then its always deserved a better home thats not true at all..Things change, you want your dog to be apart of your life..but an ex showing dog can not be apart of your life when its no longer showing is it..Its left at home not having a clue why its no longer allowed to get in the car every week end and meet up with all his doggy mates in the showing hall..
But surely if its gone to a pet home where its no longer shown it will still not have a clue why its no longer allowed to get in the car every week to meet up with its doggy mates?
Reply With Quote
spot
Dogsey Veteran
spot is offline  
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,724
 
02-05-2010, 08:15 PM
Originally Posted by settagirl View Post
Personally have no problem with showing, my boys are from a proper show kennel, (Codee working). I think if the dog likes it and it must otherwise you wouldn't get the best out of it, then its a great way of socialisation for dog and owner!!
Whilst I could not rehome my dogs, I can see why a show kennel would, if they run on more than the one pup or want their older stock to have fireside homes in their later years, to have owners who are more 'there for them'.
That word stock says it all for me!
So why cant people admit they are basically stock animal for some? not pets but stock?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 24 of 36 « First < 14 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 34 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top