|
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
|
|
Originally Posted by
Hali
Never heard of it before. I guess the one use I can see (for things like HTM) is if you eventually work up to giving a serious of commands in one go rather than waiting for the dog to complete the first action before giving the command for the next one.
so e.g. sit-next-paw-next-bow next would get the dog to do 3 commands in a row?
Is that the eventual aim?
No as far as I can see it is so the dog is ready waiting for the next command, like if you say 'sit' then 'next' it means the dog isnt to just get up but there is another command comming
But I train my dogs that 'sit' means 'sit there till I tell you something else' I dont have a wait or stay command
Originally Posted by
mishflynn
Odd ive never really thought?
In horses theres "And" as a precurser to a change of pace, whilst lunging etc.
I use no ,as a stopper & then recommand
I suppose my next command is in general the dogs name
Or at times possibly "ready"
But dont really have a commandfor that purpose.
What command did the trainer use? & how?
I didnt see how she uses it with her dogs, but she was getting us to say 'next' in a string of simple rapid fire commands 'sit, next, down, next, stand, next, sit'
Originally Posted by
SLB
Didnt she tell you a "quiet" command would help with his barking?
Benjie was a terrible barker so I him "speak" then I taught him "quiet" And I can now tell him quiet whenever he's barking and he'll shush
Would've thought that better than "next"
The idea was supposed to be that her dogs barked less because they knew another command was comming and it reduced confusion
Unfort the quiet command has never worked with Ben, it took 9 months to get him to bark on command, and he has never got the hang of quiet
He barks when he is excited, when I give a really exciting command like 'weave' he will give a wuff before he does it and then wimper the whole time he is doing it
Originally Posted by
ClaireandDaisy
Why not just use Wait (which means the same thing)? Well it does to us anyway!
yup it does sound the same
Originally Posted by
Tassle
No - never used a 'next'.
I used a 'Working' when I want the dogs to concentrate and 'finished' when we are done.
But once I have said working, they are listening and it does not really matter what command I give next.
exactly, I think when they are in the zone they dont need to know another command is comming, they expect it
Originally Posted by
Fivedogpam
In agility some people use a command to warn their dog that a change of direction is imminent, like 'And....' as they are approaching a jump so they know to take the jump but be prepared to turn sharply. Works for them but I have enough trouble getting the correct commands out at the right time without adding to them!
Havent heard of that, I am using kinda the sylva trkmans cip cap method - althought I just say 'go left' to mean go out and do the jump and wrap the wing. for less wide turns I rely on my position and let them move in towards me or tell them 'out' away from me
Originally Posted by
Tassle
- I am surprised people have time!!!
lol yup I know, the less I can say the better
Originally Posted by
Kerryowner
Well my dog is so well-trained if I said "Next" he would fetch my credit card thinking a trip to the shops was imminent!!
Seriously though I have never heard of this command either at heelwork to music or agility classes-think my dogs would be confused to be honest.
hahahahahahahahaha hahahaha