register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
wilbar
Dogsey Veteran
wilbar is offline  
Location: West Sussex UK
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,044
Female 
 
11-02-2011, 06:11 PM
I think it's a great overview of the research & fallout from aversives when used in dog training & behaviour modification ~ well backed up by proper peer-reviewed, published scientific research.

I have one of Karen Overall's books, aimed at vets so not particularly interesting reading for all dog owners. But she's done some great work trying to highlight some of the cruel practices in the USA. It's the research done by people like this that will form our future treatment of dogs, as the science trickles down to the dog-owning public. We're learning more & more evry day because of these studies. Look how far we've come already from the days of Barbara Woodhouse, & the cruel practices that used to be used by police & the forces. These old-fashioned methods of using aversives in dog training have been so discredited because of the research done by people like Overall, to the extent that forums like this are full of people promoting pos R, & kind, empathetic training methods.

Never mind Adam ~ I just hope the trickle of empathy for dogs reaches you one day soon!
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
11-02-2011, 06:32 PM
I do like post 21 of that:

I understand though that the Tortora study involved high level use of electric shock (stim) as well as low, and that during the study dogs were beaten with switches and/or newspapers when asked to do an obedience command.

This clearly causes a welfare problem and few would be keen to subject their dogs to this kind of treatment, which surely has to be considered extreme and abusive?


I don't think supporters of that study seem to ever mention this?
Why not?

MODS: sorry not sure if this above bit is allowed or not! Please do delete if inappropriate!


Also anyone who Knows who she is must realise that she has a vested interest in people not using e collars.

Adam
No, I think she writes with passion about something she believes in. She has been attacked by shock collar supporters, as has anyone who speaks out against them.

Karen Overall's review is a good, scientific, well thought out and well written article.


Wys
x
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
11-02-2011, 06:34 PM
Originally Posted by Sara'n'Scout View Post
Karen Overall (2007), J of Vet Behavior
Considerations for shock and ‘training’ collars: Concerns from and for
the working dog community

http://www.dogdaysnw.com/doc/overall_collars.pdf


Very interesting! It's written for a Scientific Journal, so it's a bit of a tough read. But it explains the science behind why they're bad and talks about some interesting studies.

....]
Thanks for bringing it to our attention,Sara'n'Scout

I'm going to digest it some more.
Dr Karen Overall has also written some other fab articles.

Wys
x
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,574
Male 
 
11-02-2011, 06:47 PM
Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
<post after post>
Can you stop spamming this thread - make your points in one post, unless you are replying to someone with a point they have made.
Reply With Quote
Moonstone
Dogsey Veteran
Moonstone is offline  
Location: USA/UK
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,421
Female 
 
11-02-2011, 06:57 PM
Thanks Sara'n'Scout
Reply With Quote
k9paw
Dogsey Veteran
k9paw is offline  
Location: The Badlands
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,889
Female 
 
11-02-2011, 07:31 PM
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
At last a piece of informative writing and research telling us just how bad these shock collars are for our dogs especially those of a nervous nature.
Yes, think so too.
Reply With Quote
Adam P
Almost a Veteran
Adam P is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,497
Male 
 
11-02-2011, 09:45 PM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
Can you stop spamming this thread - make your points in one post, unless you are replying to someone with a point they have made.
I'm not spamming, I'm commenting, points get brought up new and I answer them.

Re the Overall article

I misunderstod, I thought it was a science paper, but, what she wrote is ifs buts & maybe's, samle

Karen Overall - The hippocampus is the primary region where fears and anxieties associated with fearful stimuli are thought to originate, so a logical sequela to a stressful, painful stimulus may be fear, phobia, or withdrawal.

She's just ad libbing tbh.

Adam
Reply With Quote
Adam P
Almost a Veteran
Adam P is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,497
Male 
 
11-02-2011, 09:47 PM
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg View Post
I do like post 21 of that:

I understand though that the Tortora study involved high level use of electric shock (stim) as well as low, and that during the study dogs were beaten with switches and/or newspapers when asked to do an obedience command.

This clearly causes a welfare problem and few would be keen to subject their dogs to this kind of treatment, which surely has to be considered extreme and abusive?


I don't think supporters of that study seem to ever mention this?
Why not?

MODS: sorry not sure if this above bit is allowed or not! Please do delete if inappropriate!




No, I think she writes with passion about something she believes in. She has been attacked by shock collar supporters, as has anyone who speaks out against them.

Karen Overall's review is a good, scientific, well thought out and well written article.


Wys
x
While I disagree with that aspect of the study The study did set out to elminate defensive aggresison in dogs and this was one (pretty extreme) way of testing it. Which by the way worked.

For full study follow the link http://www.4shared.com/document/OuXHUYuM/Tortora.html


Adam
Reply With Quote
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,062
Female 
 
11-02-2011, 10:19 PM
Originally Posted by Adam Palmer View Post
She's just ad libbing tbh.

Adam
Educated guestimates because, as yet, we can only make educated guestimates based on the physiological knowledge we possess.

However educated guestimates are far better than uneducated drivel - wouldn't you agree?
Reply With Quote
Adam P
Almost a Veteran
Adam P is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,497
Male 
 
11-02-2011, 10:26 PM
Originally Posted by Brierley View Post
Educated guestimates because, as yet, we can only make educated guestimates based on the physiological knowledge we possess.

However educated guestimates are far better than uneducated drivel - wouldn't you agree?
What like the antis (who have never even seen an e collar used) spout regularly?

Adam
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top