register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Mahooli
Dogsey Veteran
Mahooli is offline  
Location: Poodle Heaven!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,297
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 12:42 PM
The real tragedy is (whether he is mentally ill or not) that he was allowed to have dogs again after he'd killed one in the same circumstances. If he'd be prosecuted and banned from keeping animals then he wouldn't have had any in his care, his mental state would have been immaterial.
Becky
Reply With Quote
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 01:21 PM
Originally Posted by Mahooli View Post
The real tragedy is (whether he is mentally ill or not) that he was allowed to have dogs again after he'd killed one in the same circumstances. If he'd be prosecuted and banned from keeping animals then he wouldn't have had any in his care, his mental state would have been immaterial.
Becky
I agree with you there, as I would in ANY situation like this.
Reply With Quote
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 01:25 PM
Originally Posted by dizzi View Post
I actually went off reading this thread once all the really unpleasant stuff about mental illness started being posted.

It's incredibly hard to understand just how badly your judgement can be impaired and how the world can seem utterly utterly distorted unless you've been there. It's no secret I suffer incredibly badly with depression (various reasons I fully understand, added with that my GP's a plonker)... when things are at their worst I feel like my brain is trying to function through a mixture of cotton wool and treacle, and like I'm somehow stuck behind a plate of glass from the rest of the world - I can hear them, I can see them but I can't "connect" with them. I function well enough at work (but I manage the work I do very very carefully to not make myself overloaded), but it's functioning level only... indeed when I came to the point of having a breakdown I taught an observed lesson incredibly well and was then found sobbing uncontrollably and shaking and just falling utterly apart at my desk a few minutes after the kids had left the building - my head, who'd seen me in action a few hours earlier commented that I seemed to be just fine back then but now she realised I wasn't well at all and just managed to separate off my work persona from the gibbering wreck that was me in reality (it's easier in teaching to do this I think when you even get called by a different name during the working day - my "Mrs Suit" is an impermeable bullet-proofed superhero outfit that grants me immunity to the rubbish going on inside)... and she kicked my backside off the school premises and threatened deep wrongings if I was seen again until I was truly better (I loved my old boss - she was fantastic in knowing when to be fluffy and when to deliver a good backside kicking).

I'm sure to the outside world I could quite easily have looked like I was faking it or similar then - I simply had coping strategies that had allowed me to function when I was in a really really diabolical mental state that were working so well (and unfortunately allowing me to push on and make myself iller and iller - think it took me a good couple of years to recover from that breakdown in the end) that it came as a collossal shock to everyone the day I fell apart completely (and even when I fell apart - I'd still held it together till I got the kids out of the school door). It took one silly catalyst in the end to unwravel the whole thing completely (for me it was seeing the newsletter announcing I was leaving - reluctantly - without expecting it)... so I can actually understand how a man who was ill to start with, suddenly seemed to do something so much on what looked like the spur of the moment with the suicide attempt - rightly or wrongly and I do genuinely believe he's got mental health issues.

Like I say - you really really can't understand just what it's like and it IS still this stupidly large taboo with people parrotting phrases like "trying it on" or "pull yourself together"... and that's why so far I've stayed away from this thread because the attitudes to mental health being shouted from the rooftops are really sickening to read as someone who suffers from it and has come very close to suicide in the past themselves.

Yep - the dogs died horrifically, yes, processes failed and people failed and the whole thing is hideous - but if you're suffering from mental illness the lack of clarity of thought you can have is really really hard to discribe (and incredibly frustrating when you're trying to think something through and your brain's doing the cotton wool thing).

Carry on baying for blood and calling all those with mental illness (particularly the "soft" ones like stress, depression and the like) fakers and ones trying it on for sympathy now

Excellent post, unless one has either suffers from a mental illness or is related to someone who is or is exposed to thos that are, it is often difficult for "outsiders" to understand how people can "mask" problems.

It is easy to point the finger but remember, the facts state that 1 in 4 people have suffered or will suffer from some sort of mental illness during their lives, so perhaps the words "there but the grace of God............."
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,574
Male 
 
02-07-2011, 01:47 PM
Maybe police officers unfit to look after animals should not have had them under their care? Either from gross negligence in the past or mental health issues.
Reply With Quote
Westie_N
Dogsey Veteran
Westie_N is offline  
Location: West of Scotland
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,034
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 06:12 PM
Originally Posted by Mahooli View Post
The real tragedy is (whether he is mentally ill or not) that he was allowed to have dogs again after he'd killed one in the same circumstances. If he'd be prosecuted and banned from keeping animals then he wouldn't have had any in his care, his mental state would have been immaterial.
Becky
I totally agree.

If he has mental health issues he should NOT have been put in charge of dogs.

As we know, he has already been responsible for the death of a Police dog previously through negligence - he should NOT have been allowed to have Police dogs again after that (or indeed pet dogs). He should've been banned for life, IMO.

I don't care if he has mental health issues - he can't have been that bad if he was still a serving Police officer and Police dog handler. If he was, then he shouldn't have been responsible for the general public in the Police force OR be allowed to be a dog handler.

I care about the welfare of the dogs. Sadly, he didn't care much about them and they died a horrendous death due to human negligence and stupidity.
Reply With Quote
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 06:16 PM
Originally Posted by Westie_N View Post
I totally agree.

If he has mental health issues he should NOT have been put in charge of dogs.

As we know, he has already been responsible for the death of a Police dog previously through negligence - he should NOT have been allowed to have Police dogs again after that (or indeed pet dogs). He should've been banned for life, IMO.

I don't care if he has mental health issues - he can't have been that bad if he was still a serving Police officer and Police dog handler. If he was, then he shouldn't have been responsible for the general public in the Police force OR be allowed to be a dog handler.

I care about the welfare of the dogs. Sadly, he didn't care much about them and they died a horrendous death due to human negligence and stupidity.
I hope that neither you nor any of your relatives have a mental illness and if you do no one else has the same attitude.

It is easy to be self righteous when mental illness has not touched you.

You might want some sympathy if the positions were reversed.

As I said before 1 in 4 people have mental health problems at some time in their life, so hopefully you will be one of the 3 it does not touch!
Reply With Quote
Westie_N
Dogsey Veteran
Westie_N is offline  
Location: West of Scotland
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,034
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 06:22 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
I hope that neither you nor any of your relatives have a mental illness and if you do no one else has the same attitude.

It is easy to be self righteous when mental illness has not touched you.

You might want some sympathy if the positions were reversed.

As I said before 1 in 4 people have mental health problems at some time in their life, so hopefully you will be one of the 3 it does not touch!
Personally I think they're making more of this 'fact' to try and get him off with it.

The fact that he allegedly tried to do himself in after the dogs died - good, I say, he should've just done it.

These dogs should NOT have died and it was due to human negligence that they did.
Reply With Quote
Westie_N
Dogsey Veteran
Westie_N is offline  
Location: West of Scotland
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,034
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 06:23 PM
But then if he had been banned the FIRST time it happened, this wouldn't have happened again (with this officer anyway!)!
Reply With Quote
JoedeeUK
Dogsey Veteran
JoedeeUK is offline  
Location: God's Own County
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 06:23 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
I hope that neither you nor any of your relatives have a mental illness and if you do no one else has the same attitude.

It is easy to be self righteous when mental illness has not touched you.

You might want some sympathy if the positions were reversed.

As I said before 1 in 4 people have mental health problems at some time in their life, so hopefully you will be one of the 3 it does not touch!
I DO have Mental Health issues, but my dogs are never ever put at risk due to them. I've lived with MH issues for a long time.

Nothing in this guys medical history should include MH issues, he would not be fit for duties if he is as bad as is being made out ie the "suicide attempt" he has an official reprimand for the death of the first dog on his Police record, that should have prevented him from ever having any responsibility for dogs afterwards.

If he was a civilian, he would get a ban on owning dogs for a very long time
Reply With Quote
TabithaJ
Dogsey Veteran
TabithaJ is offline  
Location: London, UK
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,498
Female 
 
02-07-2011, 06:24 PM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
I hope that neither you nor any of your relatives have a mental illness and if you do no one else has the same attitude.

It is easy to be self righteous when mental illness has not touched you.

You might want some sympathy if the positions were reversed.

As I said before 1 in 4 people have mental health problems at some time in their life, so hopefully you will be one of the 3 it does not touch!



I know how awful depression can be; two people extremely close to me have suffered from it. On bad days one of them could not move; he literally just lay on the sofa with tears in his eyes.

But EVEN knowing this, I STILL do not accept this comes into the way this man treated these dogs.

Unless we are saying he had some form of problem back in 2004 also? When he killed a spaniel by leaving the dog in a car in the heat....???

No matter what his problem this man was functioning well enough to get to a meeting on time, to do his job etc.

There is no 'excuse' and no 'reason' that can possibly justify or explain his now having killed three dogs.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 15 of 28 « First < 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 25 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top