Jols has just highlighted what seems to be the particular characteristic blight of this forum.
It has seemed to me for sometime that when people come up with their posts, that they regard the importance of their opinions, the fact they they can express them louder and blunter than everyone else, and the fact that their opinion should be regarded as authoritative merely on the basis of whom they are, are all much higher priorities than considering the feelings of the others whom they are directing themselves toward.
And it is a hypocrisy, as they invariably make out they are of some higher degree of civilisation.
Like your worst sunday christians, as an analogy.
As a kiwi, it's the main negative cultural trait i note about Brits:
That being the 'opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one' thing.
Jols clearly falls into this trap.
Her posts on here truly are disgusting.
But then snorri decides to write anyone that likes snow must be an idiot...another opinion is like an ******* approach.
Luke has done the same himself before.
Then you have a thread by jimmy law blaming others for his dog being run over.
We all thought hang on a minute, surely that's his responsibility at the end of the day, but it's only human nature to look for others to blame in a tragic situation.
So most of us think of these angles before replying, even though we feel he is in the wrong.
But you just knew someone would be along in a minute with their 'opinions are like *******s' priority...and on cue...as Chrysania admits, "sorry to be a bitch"....
Some, like C & D , Borderdawn, Smokeybear, Jackbox, JodeeUK, Azz, also seem to delight in forcing opinion on others at opportunities.
Then you get great notable, kindly, sympathetic, empathetic people like SLB, Vicky, Wys, Wilbar, whom can point out the same things without the urge to make people feel like ****, or at the least, put their right to be loud and proud over and above anything else.
Dog people like to think they are some sort of special breed.... we love animals, so we must, by defintion, be nicer people, goes the line.
But sorry, dog people can be right *******s.
Im always amazed how people that jump up and down about positive dog training simply cannot apply the same high principle to their fellow humans.
Now, me, what am I? (naturally that would be your thoughts at this point).
I have fallen under the british opinions are like ******* trait in my time....bu folk know on here that i put very high value on dogsey communiques being empathetic and considerate....even to the point of pulling up people when i see this high principle of
mine being offended....at which point i am not backward in coming forward on telling people so!
In other words, the only time i allow my opinion to be an ******* is to complain about opinions as *******s.
So i can be labelled a hypocrite as well...fair dues.
The way i see it?
That's always been the way of the world....history has always taken on the characteristic of what it regards as the lesser man to defeat the lesser man.
To my mind, Jols has just been slightly
toooooo honest................she has crossed the line carried by many on here, but broke the rules by exposing the game.
Which is a bit too close to home for some people....
Off to either get my tin hat, Infraction (time to put a book down me trouser agen
) , or Nobel Peace Prize.
EDIT:
Sorry i forgot to add:
LOL
(apparently that's a magic wand?...which means everything you write is then ok? .......so im
not in trouble now, right?)