|
|
Location: UK
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
28-12-2007, 06:59 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn 
Mine WAS the original post and I answered by saying they should be neutered and live out their lives naturally, as was here
If anyone feels that they can help DNB, please please do. On here, and other forums this is very much a just a theoretical discussion, DNB is standing in court next to people directly affected, are providing behavioursts and evidence and experts where needed, who have the expertise and qualifications necessary that DOES make them experts in their fields, but most importantly, they are dog carers, who do care, who do care as much about children and families as they do their dogs, and are striving to get a change in law for be benefit of both dogs and people. If you can, please help.
|
Location: Here !
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,681
|
28-12-2007, 07:07 PM
Originally Posted by Malady
Again, I've not been rude to you, so dont be rude to me, it's a discussion thread, you have your opinion, I have mine, you dont need to speak to me like a child, nor do you have the right to.
Originally Posted by Sal
I'm not been rude
which part of that don't you understand????
|
|
Location: UK
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
28-12-2007, 07:18 PM
Originally Posted by Malady
There's nothing arrogant about being able to identify a breed !!
No need to be so rude, I havent been rude to you, and I dont expect it in return.....!As for dogs from welfares etc, they will have paperwork to back it up which cannot be disputed etc.
Dogs from rescues have been seized. The rescue paperwork means about as much as KC registration papers. They are worth nothing, not even the paper they are written on. They are not being disputed, they are, under the law irrelevent. These dogs are being judged on their looks alone. Nothing else.
So what do you suggest we do with all the legal dogs that look like type ?
|
|
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
|
28-12-2007, 07:22 PM
Originally Posted by Callum
I am aware you are the orig OP. again I refered to the original post by "wiped out" NOT the case mentioned.
So you have suggested a "WIPING OUT" of ALL pitbull dogs globally? Or only in the US or only in the UK?
Can you tell me how you would ID PB dogs correctly and how you would see the wiping out being achieved? Im presuming you would want to inc PB crosses?
What about "TYPE" do you think all PB TYPE should be wiped out as is the descriptor in the UK?
With regard to "type" again, same as here, many "types" were seized here recently, very very few were PTS, I think the authorities are better aware of what these dogs are now.
|
Location: liquor cabinet ward 6
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,058
|
28-12-2007, 07:30 PM
|
|
Location: Here !
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,681
|
28-12-2007, 07:33 PM
Originally Posted by Manuka
Being rude ? I was replying to the quote in the tone it was written.
I have nothing further to say to you, as you cant seem to be polite.
|
|
Location: Here !
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,681
|
28-12-2007, 07:33 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn
Well IMO PB have largely been extinguished in the UK so similar can be applied elsewhere. PB are already illegal in some states I believe, I think it works fairly well there although I dont know how they police it.
With regard to "type" again, same as here, many "types" were seized here recently, very very few were PTS, I think the authorities are better aware of what these dogs are now.
|
Location: With the fairies in the garden
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,519
|
28-12-2007, 07:34 PM
Originally Posted by bajaluna
pits are not illegal here, you just have to carry a large liability insurance to own one in a city,they will never ban them because there are so many who choose to own them, they are everywhere and people love them
