register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Tass
Almost a Veteran
Tass is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,096
Female 
 
07-06-2012, 09:45 PM
Originally Posted by Delos View Post
It depends what you classify by harm. By their very design Prong collars are designed to assert pressure and discomfort in a way that can cause pain. So yes they are designed to cause harm the samd way Choke chains are. Personally I would want them to ban Prong collars along with Choke chains which are just as barbaric and have no place in Dog training.
Can, not necessarily will. Used well check/choke chains work by a momentary check, not by choking (dogs can choke more on a flat collar) but often much more importantly by using the noise, even without tightening onto the neck (hence the need to use them with some slack, on a loose lead), as an interruptive attention-getter, as do martingale collars so they also may cause harm but are not "designed" to do so. To "design" them to cause harm would be counter productive. Whether or not they achieve the desired effect, what would be the point of damaging the dog in the process?

If you read my other posts in this thread will you see I do not like pinch collars and I have seen harm that could only have been caused by a pinch collar, but that does not mean that are designed to do so, not that other "kind" equipment cannot cause damage under some circumstances.



Some of the worse wounds I have seen have been from horribly embedded flat collars. I have also seen harm caused by clickers with noise phobic dogs.

IME things are rarely black and white.
Reply With Quote
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
08-06-2012, 06:11 AM
Originally Posted by Tass View Post
Can, not necessarily will. Used well check/choke chains work by a momentary check, not by choking (dogs can choke more on a flat collar) but often much more importantly by using the noise, even without tightening onto the neck (hence the need to use them with some slack, on a loose lead), as an interruptive attention-getter, as do martingale collars so they also may cause harm but are not "designed" to do so. To "design" them to cause harm would be counter productive. Whether or not they achieve the desired effect, what would be the point of damaging the dog in the process?

If you read my other posts in this thread will you see I do not like pinch collars and I have seen harm that could only have been caused by a pinch collar, but that does not mean that are designed to do so, not that other "kind" equipment cannot cause damage under some circumstances.



Some of the worse wounds I have seen have been from horribly embedded flat collars. I have also seen harm caused by clickers with noise phobic dogs.

IME things are rarely black and white.
Excellent, balanced, logical, sound post.
Reply With Quote
hayleyth
Dogsey Junior
hayleyth is offline  
Location: huntingdon
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 32
Female 
 
08-06-2012, 07:07 AM
I do have a gencon which applies pressure if my dog pulls. Personally best lead ever and now my dog is just walked on slip lead. So def work! Dont like prong collars
Reply With Quote
bwmotz
New Member!
bwmotz is offline  
Location: New Jersey, USA
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Male 
 
12-06-2012, 05:20 PM
There's a huge difference! A harness is only meant as a way to attach a leash to a dog without doing it at his neck. A prong collar is meant primarily as a correction tool.

Are you really comparing pressure vs something that actually sticks into your skin? If I lean against a wall, that's pressure. If I lean against a nail, that's sticking into me and that hurts.

Originally Posted by rune View Post
Or indeed any collar.

Do you think that pressure from a harness is different in any way from pressure from things that stick into you?

rune
Reply With Quote
dog collar
Dogsey Junior
dog collar is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21
Female 
 
19-06-2012, 10:33 AM
had a lady bring a dog wearing one to my training class - she was told to 'remove' it...or else! Another 'respected' trainer told her they were wonderful gadgets to get the dog to heel


Originally Posted by Azz View Post
A good trainer does not need to inflict pain on a dog to train him or her - and as demonstrated in this thread there's never really a good reason for *any* pet home (or any dog owner) to use one.

So does anyone else think they should be banned?
Reply With Quote
maria123
Dogsey Junior
maria123 is offline  
Location: Derbyshire uk
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 58
Female 
 
21-07-2012, 01:38 PM
so if all collars and harnesses and others was banned how would take your dog out on a lead , you nead a collar or harnesses ex to take your dog out
Reply With Quote
polly7
Dogsey Junior
polly7 is offline  
Location: north yorkshire
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 151
Female 
 
31-07-2012, 09:01 PM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
Well that's another problem altogether - people not learning how to train their dogs (and I hope you're not suggesting that idiot owners should be given a license to abuse their dogs - just because they're too lazy to learn how to train properly I've got a better idea - don't get a dog if you can't be bothered to put the time and effort in).
i couldn't agree more.
choke-collars, prong collars, electric shock collars are abhorrent. They are used as short cuts to training and therefore equal poor training.
Spend time and use positive not negative training.
Whoever can honestly look into the eyes of their beloved pet and then inflict that pain and confusion on them is quite beyond me.
Maybe I am oversensitive because i have rescued greyhounds who are by the very nature of their lives, abused on a daily basis. when they come to us in trauma and emotional & physical upheavel we try to gain their trust and show them there is a life without hurt and fear.
The most humbling & rewarding part of my life is when they come to me for love instead of flinching away in terror for then I know I have gained that trust and they can start to live again.
How anyone can knowingly inflict fear on dog is beyond my comprehension.
Reply With Quote
Darcy Boy
Dogsey Veteran
Darcy Boy is offline  
Location: Lowestoft, UK
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,611
Female 
 
16-09-2012, 04:32 PM
Yes they should be banned along with anything that inflicks pain.
Reply With Quote
Ben Mcfuzzylugs
Dogsey Veteran
Ben Mcfuzzylugs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
Female 
 
16-09-2012, 04:49 PM
It is an interesting fluffy term to say a prong collar checks a dog
What does check mean?

Yes the truth is they are not supposed to stab into the neck, although some people have them sharp so they do

The honest name is pinch collar
Bits of skin all round the dogs neck are pinched, yes the dog learns the noise is followed by the pinching so they try and avoid it

It has to be fairly unpleasant for it to work as quickly as it does when used correctly
And they cause injury when used incorrectly

So yes I think there is no place for them and they should be banned
Reply With Quote
ClaireandDaisy
Dogsey Veteran
ClaireandDaisy is offline  
Location: Essex, UK
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,147
Female 
 
16-09-2012, 06:32 PM
Originally Posted by maria123 View Post
so if all collars and harnesses and others was banned how would take your dog out on a lead , you nead a collar or harnesses ex to take your dog out

Suggest you read the thread?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 12 of 13 « First < 2 9 10 11 12 13 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prong collars - are they ever suitable for pet owners? Azz Training 702 28-02-2012 11:48 PM
Extraordinary Dogs TV Prog. Prong collars. Dobermann Training 17 14-03-2011 06:04 PM
Prong collars Dale's mum General Dog Chat 70 18-03-2008 04:51 PM
Prong or Pinch collars kinzy Training 17 21-05-2004 06:25 PM

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top