register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:29 AM
Originally Posted by Hevvur View Post
Are you referring to my post, and to the CM video I commented on?
If so, then it was forced!
CM held the dog and forced her to stand there and let her bottom be sniffed, when she didn't want it sniffed!

Thats force, and thats what me, and others don't like!

If a strange dog came to sniff Teagans bottom she would spin around and try and get them. She just isn't comfortable with having dogs that close to her.

No, what I meant was that I would not force a dog to stand still by means of physical force to have her bum sniffed.
Reply With Quote
Mahooli
Dogsey Veteran
Mahooli is offline  
Location: Poodle Heaven!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,297
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:29 AM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
No Becky, he does not say that about the "bite". Neither does he use this to gain a dog's attention necessarily. It's effectiveness lies in the mimic of a bitch reprimanding her puppies for biting a teat too hard, or some other misdemeanour. And before anyone says that bitches don't do this, yes they do, I have seen it many times with my own GSP pedigree, and with many other bitches - and not only with their own pups. Not a bite, but a nip, sharp enough to raise a squeak from the miscreant !

We cannot of course nip our dogs, so the finger jab is a very effective way of mimicing this.
It doesn't mimic anything a dog does at all as dogs do not jab each other. With regards to you claiming you have seen many bitches bite their pups then I would question their temperament. None of my bitches have ever bitten any of their pups.
Becky
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:32 AM
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg
But don't forget that most scientists who research dogs still seem to be using "Canis familiaris" .... I can say this because much of my study at the moment involves looking at research journals involving dogs including recently published ones.

Wys
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
I know they are Wys, and I don't agree with them, as you well know
Indeed, but what I don't really get is why. Yes the Smithsonian may have done what they did but if scientists who are highly reputable in the field are not using that classification - well, to me it says a lot. Oh well, pointless debating it really...!

Wys
x
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:33 AM
Originally Posted by Hevvur View Post
Watch the vid if you can, it's a few pages back posted by Suze

CM HELD the dog still and forced it to stay there whilst another dog sniffed it's behind.
You could see she was very uncomfortable, and kept trying to turn around, but CM held her and forced her to stay there.
Ah Ok that doesn't sound very good handling to me.

Have to watch it though.

Wys
x
Reply With Quote
JanieM
Dogsey Senior
JanieM is offline  
Location: Cambs
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 906
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:37 AM
Why would anyone reprimand their dog for growling when another dog sniffs its rear end?

Maggie sometimes does this, she did it today. It's her way of letting the other dog know she's not best pleased about it. The other dog backs off and she then instigated the sniffing on her terms. Sometimes she is in charge and sometimes the other dog is. It depends on who the other dog is.

I wouldn't tell her off for her reaction as this is her way of communicating. Why would anyone else?
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:39 AM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
He does this quiet often.

With small dogs he will pick them both up, and force one to sniff the other while he is holding them
.....
I really don't understand why he'd do this. It seems more than ridiculous to me. He's trying to make dogs use their own language when they themselves have deemed it not useful (for whatever reason). Yet he thinks he knows better. Has me scratching my head, that one.

I recall when he said a raise paw was dominance - it's well documented that it is not dominance at all, if anything it's the opposite. It is an appeasement gesture (in context, clearly not if the dog's trodden on a thistle or something ).

Wys
x
Reply With Quote
Wysiwyg
Dogsey Veteran
Wysiwyg is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,551
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:41 AM
Originally Posted by JanieM View Post
Why would anyone reprimand their dog for growling when another dog sniffs its rear end?

Maggie sometimes does this, she did it today. It's her way of letting the other dog know she's not best pleased about it. The other dog backs off and she then instigated the sniffing on her terms. Sometimes she is in charge and sometimes the other dog is. It depends on who the other dog is.

I wouldn't tell her off for her reaction as this is her way of communicating. Why would anyone else?
Yes, I certainly allow my girl to tell another dog off if it's being too pushy .... I've no problem with it, because it's natural and not aggressive. I don't encourage it though nor do I put her in situations where she will have to keep doing it ( ie if a dog keeps bothering her).

Wys
x
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:42 AM
Originally Posted by Mahooli View Post
I beg your pardon, you say that a dog shouldn't be forced to have it's bum sniffed but you will 'reprimand' your dog if he objects to another dog sniffing his backside. Basically you tell your dog off for showing any negative, but natural, dog behaviour. That's disgusting, dogs have every right to tell another dog that it doesn't like what it is doing. To be told off for doing that is totally wrong.
Your poor dog.
Becky
I would indeed Becky. Because he is MY dog and I expect that behaviour from him. He lives in my house and he abides by my rules, which are firm but fair. He knows these rules, I NEVER have to use force, and neither would I. I would NEVER pin him down, or physically restrain him in order to "allow" him to let another dog sniff his parts.

I compare this seemingly unfair rigid discipline, for want of a better phrase, to the mindless square bashing that the squaddies have to endure when they first join the army. There seems to be absolutely no point to it. Who cares whether you can see your face or your **** in the shine of your boots? But this is how it is. The Sargent Major is the Alpha Male, He Who Must Be Obeyed, the Pack Leader. After weeks of this mindless square bashing and polishing, a highly disciplined and very effective troop of young men will be let loose in Afghanistan or Basra, and then they discover the raison d'etre behind the square bashing and polishing. Suddenly, the automatic and unthinking obeying of the orders that fly through the air during a roadside ambush is saving lives. Without that mindless square bashing and polishing, the young squaddies would not have been capable in the face of enemy fire to be able to respond so quickly and unthinkingly. This sort of discipline saves lives.

A very over the top analogy, but the point I am making that however unfair the order, my dog will obey ... he might be naughty at sitting first time at the kerb, or he might try it on when he is on the lead, but when the chips are down and I am ASKING (not ordering) him to not retaliate when an unsocialised dog is giving him a hard time, or indeed the other way round, when HE is giving an unsocialised dog a hard time, I can stop him from doing so before escalation occurs into something more serious. This is the equivalent to the discipline of the square bashing IMO.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:46 AM
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg View Post
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg




Indeed, but what I don't really get is why. Yes the Smithsonian may have done what they did but if scientists who are highly reputable in the field are not using that classification - well, to me it says a lot. Oh well, pointless debating it really...!

Wys
x
You know me Wys, stubborn as a mule ! If God himself refuted the Smithsonian's classification (is it with a y or an i, I can never remember!), I would still argue with it, simply because I know what I have seen with my own eyes ... and in some cases, lived with too.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
07-08-2009, 10:50 AM
Originally Posted by Mahooli View Post
It doesn't mimic anything a dog does at all as dogs do not jab each other. With regards to you claiming you have seen many bitches bite their pups then I would question their temperament. None of my bitches have ever bitten any of their pups.
Becky

Becky, I KNOW they don't. The secret is in the word "mimic". I explained I think that we cannot go round biting our dogs of course Next best thing IMO is the CM bite.

And I did not say that my bitch bit her puppies, I said reprimanded I believe, or nipped? I have seen many other bitches in particular doing this, with other bitches' pups. How odd that are experiences are so different.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 118 of 125 « First < 18 68 108 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top