register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
ClaireandDaisy
Dogsey Veteran
ClaireandDaisy is offline  
Location: Essex, UK
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,147
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 09:27 AM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
I think the thing that most people are opposed to are them being an easy dispose outlet for breeders,
Actually, Azz... `easy` is a hammer over the head and an incinerator. Or a water butt.
Reply With Quote
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,080
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 09:38 AM
I've never understood the dog world.

You'd think we'd all be working together for the good of dogs and yet there's so much bitching (excuse the pun) and politics that it tears itself apart.

It's so very, very sad
Reply With Quote
Jet&Copper
Dogsey Veteran
Jet&Copper is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,600
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 09:54 AM
Originally Posted by Brierley View Post
I've never understood the dog world.

You'd think we'd all be working together for the good of dogs and yet there's so much bitching (excuse the pun) and politics that it tears itself apart.

It's so very, very sad
This is what I always wonder too. Too many egos involved, I think.
Reply With Quote
JoedeeUK
Dogsey Veteran
JoedeeUK is offline  
Location: God's Own County
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 10:54 AM
Originally Posted by Velvetboxers View Post
What is wrong with people that they choose to attack a charity that does such good work, its unbelievable.........
They are not a charity they are a limited company
Reply With Quote
Mese
Dogsey Senior
Mese is offline  
Location: Cheshire , UK
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 784
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 11:15 AM
I think its disgusting attacking Many Tears

They may have their faults , I dont know , I know next to nothing about them , but what I do know is that over the years they have placed 1000's of dogs with loving families ... dogs that , if it werent for them , may have ended up slaughtered once their usefulness was done , dogs that never knew a gentle touch or simple kindness until they were handed over to Many Tears

Whoever is attacking this lady and the rescue must have a heart of stone , or no heart at all

As for whether Many Tears is a company or a rescue , its all just words ... its the deed that counts , and as they save dogs I call them a rescue
Reply With Quote
Fernsmum
Dogsey Veteran
Fernsmum is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,773
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 12:13 PM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
I think the thing that most people are opposed to are them being an easy dispose outlet for breeders, and dare I say it puppy farmers? I think it completely goes against the ethos of a dog welfare 'charity' to aid puppy farmers in any way shape or form.

I'm not saying they do aid puppy farmers - but one has to question the sheer volume of 'ex breeders' that seem to come into their possession.

Personally I would like to see people campaign and lobby parliament for change - rather than taking the law into their own hands.

Better Many Tears takes them than them being hit over the head with a shovel or worse
At least Many Tears gives them a chance of some happiness .
Reply With Quote
Fernsmum
Dogsey Veteran
Fernsmum is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,773
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 12:15 PM
Originally Posted by rune View Post
Nor do the RSPCA in our area, nor the NAWT ( unless the dogs are unrehomable by them). Nor as far as I know does the Dogs Trust very often.

In fact I don't know of many who do?

rune
Nor do the SSPCA .
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,577
Male 
 
02-04-2012, 12:28 PM
Originally Posted by ClaireandDaisy View Post
Actually, Azz... `easy` is a hammer over the head and an incinerator. Or a water butt.
You think that's easy remind me not to mess with you

I think profiteering out of the misery of animals is one thing, outright killing or breaking the law is quite another.

Also, I think there's more hassle in trying to 'get rid of bodies'... obviously the PFs prefer giving away the ex-breeders to rescues, wonder why? ...cost it's the easy option.
Reply With Quote
Azz
Administrator
Azz is offline  
Location: South Wales, UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,577
Male 
 
02-04-2012, 12:37 PM
Originally Posted by Fernsmum View Post
Better Many Tears takes them than them being hit over the head with a shovel or worse
At least Many Tears gives them a chance of some happiness .
But it leads to more suffering, so much more suffering down the line Ali because it's easy for the PFs.

If we make life hard for the puppy farmers we have a better chance of stopping them.
Reply With Quote
rune
Dogsey Veteran
rune is offline  
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
Female 
 
02-04-2012, 12:41 PM
Originally Posted by Azz View Post
But it leads to more suffering, so much more suffering down the line Ali because it's easy for the PFs.

If we make life hard for the puppy farmers we have a better chance of stopping them.
How hard is it to knock a dog on the head and bury it?

rune
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 17 < 1 2 3 4 5 12 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rant through tears(soz) Tupacs2legs General Dog Chat 44 01-07-2010 09:05 PM
Close to Tears....What Do I do? Doggielover General Dog Chat 12 25-02-2007 06:03 PM
Tears in heaven Luke Music 5 23-10-2005 08:16 AM

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top