register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,942
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 04:18 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
No I understood your point clearly.

Mine is simply that, what Constitutes healthy to one country may not to another.

Country A,B,or C, may not see excessive folds or slack eyes as unhealthy.

And my point is, that we may become isolated in what we deem to be correct, and back ourselves into a corner of small gene pools, due to working to eradicate traits, which other countries prefer.
Surely, excessive folds/slack eyes etc are either healthy or unhealthy?? Would it make it right to go along with something that our vets deemed unhealthy to keep a breed going??

As previously said, I'm not a breeder or, for that matter, a particular breed enthusiast (I just love dogs ), but every time I muse on the subject, I keep coming back to health being the paramount issue and, to me, if losing a breed is a better alternative than producing dogs of that breed who are likely to suffer all their lives, then surely losing the breed is the better option. I would hope, of course, there are other and better alternatives
Reply With Quote
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,942
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 04:22 PM
Originally Posted by Greyhawk View Post
It seems that other countries aren't as impressed by the health testing going on at Crufts as people are over here:

AKC takes a stand
Shame on the AKC if they are unable to accept that dogs deserve to live healthy lives and that breeders have a responsibility to ensure as far as is possible they do exactly that!
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
11-03-2012, 04:31 PM
Originally Posted by Brierley View Post
Surely, excessive folds/slack eyes etc are either healthy or unhealthy?? Would it make it right to go along with something that our vets deemed unhealthy to keep a breed going??

As previously said, I'm not a breeder or, for that matter, a particular breed enthusiast (I just love dogs ), but every time I muse on the subject, I keep coming back to health being the paramount issue and, to me, if losing a breed is a better alternative than producing dogs of that breed who are likely to suffer all their lives, then surely losing the breed is the better option. I would hope, of course, there are other and better alternatives
But we wont lose a breed will we, because we don`t have exclusive rights to " A" breed. I think that`s something we are all forgetting.

What we do here is not going to influence what other countries deeming what is correct for their breed standard, they will continue to breed to the standard as they see fit, and if we chance the standard to a degree that importing anything from a broad will undo what has been achieved, we wont import, and so the gene pool will get smaller and then what happens?
Reply With Quote
rune
Dogsey Veteran
rune is offline  
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 04:41 PM
Originally Posted by Greyhawk View Post
It seems that other countries aren't as impressed by the health testing going on at Crufts as people are over here:

AKC takes a stand
Together with a picture of a doberman with cropped ears---says it all.

rune
Reply With Quote
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,942
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 05:01 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
But we wont lose a breed will we, because we don`t have exclusive rights to " A" breed. I think that`s something we are all forgetting.

What we do here is not going to influence what other countries deeming what is correct for their breed standard, they will continue to breed to the standard as they see fit, and if we chance the standard to a degree that importing anything from a broad will undo what has been achieved, we wont import, and so the gene pool will get smaller and then what happens?
We lose the breed here so overall breed less unhealthy dogs
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
11-03-2012, 05:07 PM
Originally Posted by Brierley View Post
We lose the breed here so overall breed less unhealthy dogs
But will we??

The trouble with people, is they always will want something new, so mr A, wants breed B, he speaks to Mr C abroad and imports one, then someone else wants one and so the cycle begins again, that`s how we get breeds on the import register, so what happens then, we have killed off our version of breed A, but then someone will import another version of breed A and it starts all over again.

We will never lose a breed as long as we can import from abroad.
Reply With Quote
Chris
Dogsey Veteran
Chris is offline  
Location: Lincolnshire
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,942
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 05:11 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
But will we??

The trouble with people, is they always will want something new, so mr A, wants breed B, he speaks to Mr C abroad and imports one, then someone else wants one and so the cycle begins again, that`s how we get breeds on the import register, so what happens then, we have killed off our version of breed A, but then someone will import another version of breed A and it starts all over again.

We will never lose a breed as long as we can import from abroad.
Maybe. However neither A nor B would be able to be shown unless it had healthy conformation, eyes that didn't droop to the point it couldn't blink and good skin condition
Reply With Quote
Ben Mcfuzzylugs
Dogsey Veteran
Ben Mcfuzzylugs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,723
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 05:16 PM
Originally Posted by Moobli View Post
Could working lines of various breeds be introduced to try to combat exaggerations and produce a more "middle of the road" type? Not just thinking GSDs here, but I have seen various working types (bloodhounds, bassets, clumbers etc) in the past few days that look far less exaggerated than the show types and who look an awful lot healthier too.
If the working breeders are happy to have thier dogs used hopefully some would be if it helps the breeds

Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
What happens when we change some of theses breeds , working for less exaggeration and so on, what happens to diversity then, we will be isolated in breeding A.B. OR c, we have no influence on the rest of the world and their breeding regimes.

W e talk of introducing new genes all the time, to add diversity and new blood, but who is going to want to (after breeding for less exaggeration) go and bring in new blood from abroad when the new blood will be an example of what you are breeding away from.

Some breeds have small gene pools as it is, will we be in danger of reducing the gene pool even more,

Looking a the Neo at Crufts, I was impressed by less exaggeration than I expected, so we have to reduce it more, where do we go for "new blood" to help widen the gene pool , if you look to the country of origin, it is far more extreme than what we see here.

I wonder if by fixing some thing, we open a door for many other problems to sneak in.
While I know what you mean and I worry about what might happen to some breeds are you saying that we shouldnt change just because noone else is?? I think more to the point you could say that other countries hopefully will eventually see how unhealthy their dogs are and try and follow our example - and will then have the ability to outcrosss to our dogs to speed up the process of making their dogs less wrinkly

but I have to wonder if actually just not breeding for features like that that over time naturally the dogs would become less eggadurated

Originally Posted by Murf View Post
I thought Doowneerg Usi the best neo dog was OTT..
yes
I havent seen the rest of them - was the judge simply picking the best of a bad bunch or were there some a little less freaky looking (poor things)

Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
Where are you going to get these healthy new genes from if not other parts of the world

If a breeder or breed club work to eradicate a trait in a bred, at some point you will have to bring in new blood from abroad , if you have just spent the last x amount of years working for less wrinkle, you are not going to go to X,Y,Z that breeds what you are trying to get way from, so what are you left with your own gene pool, that has become even more bottle necked.
actually you can work from a bottleneck and still keep a helthy amount of diversity - if everyone bred sensibly
BUT it would take a radical change in the way people think about breeding, it would involve breeding from far more dogs but taking less litters from them
doing away totaly with line breeding/in beeding
for example if a litter had 6 dogs then you breed the least wrinkly 3 of the litter instead of breeding the best 3 times
and you dont breed them back to their grandsire to fix the 'less wrinkles' you breed them to unrelated (or as much as you can get) dogs that are the least wrinkly
Its not a quick fix, yes it might be many years before some breeders are winning ribbons again, some breeds as a whole might not be in crufts again for a while

But I for one think it would be better in the long run - and then Crufts could be held up as the best dog show in the world imo

Originally Posted by Brierley View Post
The point I was, obviously unsuccessfully, trying to make that if there truly aren't any healthy dogs out there within a breed, then it really is time to seriously consider the welfare implications of keeping the breed going
Yes, I hope it isnt the case but I do think we may be seeing the last days of some breeds. If they are to be saved it will take some radical rethinking by the breed clubs
and while they wear their blinkers in thinking their dogs look OK then this will never happen

Originally Posted by Sal View Post
Confirmed by the dogs owner, that indeed it died RIP Marley x
how sad RIP Marley

Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
No I understood your point clearly.

Mine is simply that, what Constitutes healthy to one country may not to another.

Country A,B,or C, may not see excessive folds or slack eyes as unhealthy.

And my point is, that we may become isolated in what we deem to be correct, and back ourselves into a corner of small gene pools, due to working to eradicate traits, which other countries prefer.
So do you think we should continue to breed animals looking like that - or should we lead by example?

Originally Posted by Brierley View Post
Surely, excessive folds/slack eyes etc are either healthy or unhealthy?? Would it make it right to go along with something that our vets deemed unhealthy to keep a breed going??

As previously said, I'm not a breeder or, for that matter, a particular breed enthusiast (I just love dogs ), but every time I muse on the subject, I keep coming back to health being the paramount issue and, to me, if losing a breed is a better alternative than producing dogs of that breed who are likely to suffer all their lives, then surely losing the breed is the better option. I would hope, of course, there are other and better alternatives
Sadly I agree

Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
But we wont lose a breed will we, because we don`t have exclusive rights to " A" breed. I think that`s something we are all forgetting.

What we do here is not going to influence what other countries deeming what is correct for their breed standard, they will continue to breed to the standard as they see fit, and if we chance the standard to a degree that importing anything from a broad will undo what has been achieved, we wont import, and so the gene pool will get smaller and then what happens?
What do you think we should do then?? Do you agree there is a problem with things as they are right now?
Reply With Quote
rubylover
Dogsey Senior
rubylover is offline  
Location: Alberta, Canada
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 285
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 05:20 PM
Originally Posted by Jackbox View Post
Where are you going to get these healthy new genes from if not other parts of the world

If a breeder or breed club work to eradicate a trait in a bred, at some point you will have to bring in new blood from abroad , if you have just spent the last x amount of years working for less wrinkle, you are not going to go to X,Y,Z that breeds what you are trying to get way from, so what are you left with your own gene pool, that has become even more bottle necked.
Doesn't seem so difficult a conundrum - go to other breeds.

Ruby
Reply With Quote
Sal
Dogsey Veteran
Sal is offline  
Location: gloucestershire
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,432
Female 
 
11-03-2012, 05:25 PM
Crossposted,

Beverley Cuddy
Just spoken to the owner of Marley, the Dogue De Bordeaux that very sadly died yesterday. Marley was three years old and seemed to be in excellent health earlier in the day. On the way out of Crufts she collapsed and vets were quickly on the scene. Laryngeal paralysis was the diagnosis and the decision was taken to let her go as quality of life would have been very poor if extraordinary means were used. This was the first anyone knew of Marley having any health issues. Marley had had her hips done under anaesthetic about a year ago and until yesterday there had been no sign of any health problem but the Crufts vets felt this was a ticking time bomb and it could have happened at any time. Happening at Crufts meant that vet's were close and suffering kept to a minimum. It was devastating to Marley's owners but the have vowed to find out everything they can about laryngeal paralysis so that they can help prevent this happening to anyone else. My Googling shows that it is often idiopathic - I've come across it in Dalmatians. I am sure we all send them our love and support on such a very sad and traumatic event. If you see any comments suggesting overheating being the cause please direct people to this statement as there was nothing Marley's owners could have done differently to save her.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 28 of 40 « First < 18 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 38 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Soldiers Final Inspection (poem) Benzmum Off-topic Chat 4 23-11-2009 10:05 AM
it never fails to amaze me Tinnel General Dog Chat 133 09-03-2009 02:23 PM
He Never Fails To Amaze Me!! AussieGeek Training 5 23-06-2008 01:14 PM
Inspection done Sal Off-topic Chat 3 10-05-2006 11:24 AM

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top