|
Location: in a pile of nappies
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,945
|
|
Location: london.uk
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,012
|
|
|
Location: West Sussex UK
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,044
|
06-02-2011, 05:05 PM
Originally Posted by rune 
It says a lot for our society that we even have to ask if it is right to use such appalling things on animals who trust us and look to us for protection.
They stink!
rune
|
|
Location: The Badlands
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,889
|
06-02-2011, 05:20 PM
|
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,723
|
06-02-2011, 05:27 PM
Originally Posted by akitagirl
No!
If a person feels the need to use them because they aren't able to train the dog and are physically unable to hold the dog in certain situations then the dog should be rehomed. They have failed the dog.
Edited, saw a cm episode where a lady used one because she had a large breed and a dodgy arm. So the dog should suffer so she doesn't?! Discusting.
Originally Posted by Tupacs2legs
....if people cant handle big dogs without these contraptions they shouldnt have them (the dogs)... that includes police dogs imo
Originally Posted by Krusewalker
the failed bit would be the rehoming
?
|
Location: U K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,589
|
|
Location: Berkshire U.K
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 334
|
06-02-2011, 05:57 PM
I've never had an owner turn up to a class with one...sad to say I've had loads turn up with ill fitting headcollar type contraptions....yanking their Dogs by the nose.
|
|
Location: london.uk
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,012
|
06-02-2011, 05:59 PM
Originally Posted by *Lorraine*
In my view they should only be used in extreme circumstances, by experienced handlers.
I've never had an owner turn up to a class with one...sad to say I've had loads turn up with ill fitting headcollar type contraptions....yanking their Dogs by the nose.
