register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
15-12-2011, 08:41 PM
Originally Posted by Ripsnorterthe2nd View Post
Well said! It's a lovely romantic notion to allow Mother nature to take it's course, but unfortunately Human Beings often cause Mother Nature to be unbalanced in the first place by removing natural predators/introducing none native species and the only way to prevent the remaining species from becoming over run/dying out is for Humans to take on the role of population controller. Far from ideal, but it's the only way imo.
I actually disagree - I think it would be a far better thing if humans were culled (not advocating mass slaughter, just making a logical observation). What arrogance to think that we have the right as a species to **** up the balance and then having ****** it up, take on the role of population controller!!
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
15-12-2011, 08:42 PM
Originally Posted by Helena54 View Post
It's a good job we are head of the food chain isn't it........can you imagine it, if we weren't!!!! There might come a day though...........from somewhere in this great big Universe.....now there's a thought!!!
Lol !!
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
15-12-2011, 08:43 PM
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Thats a possibility,but is due to us consumers wanting cheaper meat.
Yes, I agree. It is a sad fact of life unfortunately.
Reply With Quote
Ripsnorterthe2nd
Dogsey Veteran
Ripsnorterthe2nd is offline  
Location: Co. Durham, UK
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,213
Female 
 
15-12-2011, 08:48 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
I actually disagree - I think it would be a far better thing if humans were culled (not advocating mass slaughter, just making a logical observation). What arrogance to think that we have the right as a species to **** up the balance and then having ****** it up, take on the role of population controller!!
Such language!

I never said it was ok to mess up the balance, but it is a fact: we, as a species, have removed native predators like the Wolf from Britain (as an example) and as a consequence we have to take on the role of that predator by controlling Deer numbers. Whether you agree with it is irrelevant: it is necessary.
Reply With Quote
MerlinsMum
Dogsey Veteran
MerlinsMum is offline  
Location: In an English country cowpat
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,810
Female 
 
15-12-2011, 10:31 PM
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
With regards about Canada-its a possibility that Canadian cattle are fed mostly grain inside sheds instead of grazing on grass or maybe they simply have never had a problem with TB because badgers are routinley shot.
I think too that the Canadian/North American badger species is different to our British ones, so therefore may have different habits or simply not carry TB at all.

In fact I believe we are somewhat unique in the UK with our badgers.... in Europe they are the same species but solitary and territorial, meaning they do not have large setts and don't live communally as ours do. This means badger numbers are much lower, and far easier to control if necessary (remember, they also have the threat of rabies in many countries meaning they needs to be culled occasionally in times of an outbreak).

Parts of Somerset where I live were featured in a badger/TB study which went on for many years starting in the late 60's or early 70's I think. they had areas where the badgers were left undisturbed - areas where some were culled - and other areas where they were totally eradicated.

Ironically they discovered that where badgers were culled, the TB rates got higher.... because new badgers move in to take over the territories of culled ones, and brought TB with them. So a cull may not really be the answer.

There will be a big fight over this in my area - one of the largest badger populations is right in the middle of an organic farm who will likely stand very firmly against any form of cull.

It does beg the question, why can't the badgers be given some sort of protection against TB....? They are routinely given Rabies vaccine-laced food in high-risk rabies countries.
Reply With Quote
Velvetboxers
Dogsey Veteran
Velvetboxers is offline  
Location: U K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,588
Female 
 
16-12-2011, 12:27 AM
Originally Posted by MerlinsMum View Post
I think too that the Canadian/North American badger species is different to our British ones, so therefore may have different habits or simply not carry TB at all.

In fact I believe we are somewhat unique in the UK with our badgers.... in Europe they are the same species but solitary and territorial, meaning they do not have large setts and don't live communally as ours do. This means badger numbers are much lower, and far easier to control if necessary (remember, they also have the threat of rabies in many countries meaning they needs to be culled occasionally in times of an outbreak).

Parts of Somerset where I live were featured in a badger/TB study which went on for many years starting in the late 60's or early 70's I think. they had areas where the badgers were left undisturbed - areas where some were culled - and other areas where they were totally eradicated.

Ironically they discovered that where badgers were culled, the TB rates got higher.... because new badgers move in to take over the territories of culled ones, and brought TB with them. So a cull may not really be the answer.

There will be a big fight over this in my area - one of the largest badger populations is right in the middle of an organic farm who will likely stand very firmly against any form of cull.

It does beg the question, why can't the badgers be given some sort of protection against TB....? They are routinely given Rabies vaccine-laced food in high-risk rabies countries.
Very good post
Reply With Quote
Helena54
Dogsey Veteran
Helena54 is offline  
Location: South East UK
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,437
Female 
 
16-12-2011, 06:41 AM
Originally Posted by MerlinsMum View Post
I think too that the Canadian/North American badger species is different to our British ones, so therefore may have different habits or simply not carry TB at all.

In fact I believe we are somewhat unique in the UK with our badgers.... in Europe they are the same species but solitary and territorial, meaning they do not have large setts and don't live communally as ours do. This means badger numbers are much lower, and far easier to control if necessary (remember, they also have the threat of rabies in many countries meaning they needs to be culled occasionally in times of an outbreak).

Parts of Somerset where I live were featured in a badger/TB study which went on for many years starting in the late 60's or early 70's I think. they had areas where the badgers were left undisturbed - areas where some were culled - and other areas where they were totally eradicated.

Ironically they discovered that where badgers were culled, the TB rates got higher.... because new badgers move in to take over the territories of culled ones, and brought TB with them. So a cull may not really be the answer.

[I]I knew I didn't dream it up, thanks for confirming that as I remembered seeing a whole programme about it all.[/I]

There will be a big fight over this in my area - one of the largest badger populations is right in the middle of an organic farm who will likely stand very firmly against any form of cull.

It does beg the question, why can't the badgers be given some sort of protection against TB....? They are routinely given Rabies vaccine-laced food in high-risk rabies countries.
and that's another question I had too!
Reply With Quote
Tarimoor
Dogsey Senior
Tarimoor is offline  
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 877
Female 
 
16-12-2011, 08:57 AM
Re vaccinations, this is the answer given from the link I posted earlier in the thread.

The NFU fully supports the development of vaccines for badgers. We believe that vaccines will play a role in the long term eradication of bTB.

However, at the moment the only vaccine available is an injectable form. This means that you need to cage trap the badgers to vaccinate them which is practically very challenging and has to be done annually for period of at least five years.

It is also cost prohibitive to trap and vaccinate badgers using the current vaccine as it requires investment in traps and bait and vaccination must be done by people that have been on accredited courses.

Every trap will have to be visited early in the morning every day that the traps are set. Estimates being used by other organisations suggest this that this could cost as much as £4,000 per km2 per year and must be repeated for at least five years before we could expect to see any meaningful benefit. Click here for more information on badger vaccination on the National Trust's website.

More importantly there are still question marks over the efficacy of the vaccine. There are questions for instance about its effectiveness in badgers that are already infected with bTB, ie it will not cure those badgers already infected. Furthermore, the science suggests that the vaccine is most effective in very young animals and less effective in mature animals.

Young badgers spend their early weeks in the sett, making it impossible to trap and vaccinate them and putting them at risk of infection before they emerge. Also there is still no evidence that shows that vaccinating a proportion of the badger population actually results in a reduced risk to cattle.

We believe that an oral bait vaccine is likely to offer the most successful vaccination programme for badgers. Unfortunately, this option is still some years away from being able to form part of a badger control plan because there is no licensed or proven oral vaccine currently available.


If you take a look at the link I posted earlier, it answers many of the questions people have been asking, and there are useful links through to other websites regarding badgers, tb and the control of this virus.
Reply With Quote
SLB
Dogsey Veteran
SLB is offline  
Location: Nottingham, UK
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,540
Female 
 
16-12-2011, 09:46 AM
Wouldn't it be easier to vaccinate the cattle against TB? Afterall they are used to being brought in and vets and things like that, it would mean the Badgers live and the TB is isolated.. or maybe I'm just coming up with an impossible solution..
Reply With Quote
Tarimoor
Dogsey Senior
Tarimoor is offline  
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 877
Female 
 
16-12-2011, 10:07 AM
Originally Posted by SLB View Post
Wouldn't it be easier to vaccinate the cattle against TB? Afterall they are used to being brought in and vets and things like that, it would mean the Badgers live and the TB is isolated.. or maybe I'm just coming up with an impossible solution..
You may as well just destroy the cattle, it becomes impossible to tell the difference between an infected beast, and one that's been vaccinated, all these questions are on the website link
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 7 of 10 « First < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Badgers and development Lucky Star Off-topic Chat 0 10-11-2010 07:45 PM
Badgers cally Other Pets & Animals 2 19-10-2008 05:49 PM
Photo And we thought it was badgers. dori-katie General Dog Chat 22 18-04-2008 11:30 PM
Please help the Badgers! Janay15 Other Pets & Animals 2 30-05-2007 03:16 PM
Badgers on Spring Watch Lucky Star Film, TV & Books 6 16-06-2006 06:38 PM

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top