register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Tarimoor
Dogsey Senior
Tarimoor is offline  
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 877
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 02:09 PM
Just a quick note because I'm bugged up, but as this was brought up on another forum, in discussion with Noushka, the introduction of cats to England, apparently predates the introduction of one of the main prey species for foxes, the rabbit.

For whatever reason, one is seen as native, the other isn't. I can only put this down to human selfishness, cats were originally brought here to control vermin, mice and rats; in some cases that is still their role. But it's our selfish desire to keep animals as pets, that's led to any problem; cats are versatile, adaptable creatures, and have thrived in our wildlife rich countryside. Some view this as a problem, and it very much is in certain areas, particularly where feral domestic cats have interbred with the Scottish Wild Cat.

I'll go, before I spread germs, but just thought the point worth making on here too.
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 02:12 PM
Originally Posted by Tarimoor View Post
Just a quick note because I'm bugged up, but as this was brought up on another forum, in discussion with Noushka, the introduction of cats to England, apparently predates the introduction of one of the main prey species for foxes, the rabbit.

For whatever reason, one is seen as native, the other isn't. I can only put this down to human selfishness, cats were originally brought here to control vermin, mice and rats; in some cases that is still their role. But it's our selfish desire to keep animals as pets, that's led to any problem; cats are versatile, adaptable creatures, and have thrived in our wildlife rich countryside. Some view this as a problem, and it very much is in certain areas, particularly where feral domestic cats have interbred with the Scottish Wild Cat.

I'll go, before I spread germs, but just thought the point worth making on here too.
Indeed it does, some people choose to omit some points though.

I do think feral colonies should be culled though.
Reply With Quote
Tarimoor
Dogsey Senior
Tarimoor is offline  
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 877
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 02:14 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Indeed it does, some people choose to omit some points though.

I do think feral colonies should be culled though.
I agree, though it's unfortunate, it would be crueller in some instances to try and humanise cats that are truly feral.

Right, really am off with my fuzzy head, before I type more nonsense than usual!
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 02:20 PM
Originally Posted by Tarimoor View Post
I agree, though it's unfortunate, it would be crueller in some instances to try and humanise cats that are truly feral.

Right, really am off with my fuzzy head, before I type more nonsense than usual!
I know you can never "tame" a true Scottish Wildcat.
Reply With Quote
Tupacs2legs
Dogsey Veteran
Tupacs2legs is offline  
Location: london.uk
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,012
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 02:21 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
I know you can never "tame" a true Scottish Wildcat.
or a true 'feral' cat
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 02:58 PM
Originally Posted by Tupacs2legs View Post
or a true 'feral' cat
Not sure about those Layla, I know somebody with a small holding which has a small neutered colony, the Cats protection neutered them, they were already there when they moved in, they agreed to keep them. A few are truly truly evil, but a couple are coming round and will allow her to stroke them. Not sure how "wild" they were originally though.
Reply With Quote
Noushka05
Dogsey Senior
Noushka05 is offline  
Location: DISNEYLAND
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 389
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 03:05 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
I couldnt give a monkeys what others do in their countries, Im more interested in the LAWS here thanks. You might want to look into pesticide poisoning, Trich' (I provided Birds for this) poisoning etc.. before you blame Cats, you do make me smile. Keep "estimating"
what have LAWS got to do with anything

at the end of the day it dosent take Einstein to work out that a predator so prolific and efficient a hunter as the domestic cat is not going to have a detrimental impact on wildlife ....and not only on prey species either!!.....

they can outnumber and compete with native predators. Domestic cats eat many of the same animals that native predators do. When present in large numbers, cats can reduce the availability of prey for native predators, such as hawks and weasels.





Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Put simply.

I have no issue with the damage Cats do, because they are not in any way responsible for much of any decline. However, should you wish to start a thread on cats Id be happy to take part. A huge problem with song Birds now is Trichomoniasis, which because of vermin species like Wood Pigeons and Collared Doves now being "garden" Birds, have dramatically reduced "some" numbers. I provided species for testing for this. Like what the damn Grey Squirrels have done to our Reds, the Woodies and Doves have done to Song Birds. they carry the disease, pass it on but do not die themselves, the Finches etc.. starve to death. Makes good reading.
lol well i knew you wouldnt have an issue with the damage cats do! i picked up a while ago how you view our wildlife


Originally Posted by Tarimoor View Post
Just a quick note because I'm bugged up, but as this was brought up on another forum, in discussion with Noushka, the introduction of cats to England, apparently predates the introduction of one of the main prey species for foxes, the rabbit.

For whatever reason, one is seen as native, the other isn't. I can only put this down to human selfishness, cats were originally brought here to control vermin, mice and rats; in some cases that is still their role. But it's our selfish desire to keep animals as pets, that's led to any problem; cats are versatile, adaptable creatures, and have thrived in our wildlife rich countryside. Some view this as a problem, and it very much is in certain areas, particularly where feral domestic cats have interbred with the Scottish Wild Cat.

I'll go, before I spread germs, but just thought the point worth making on here too.
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Indeed it does, some people choose to omit some points though.

.
i think you'll find i havent omitted anything lol, no one on here mentoined rabbits! ... when Tarimoor brought up the comparison between rabbits and cats elsewhere i did indeed answer

so here goes again ....rabbits are not considered Native they are considered naturalised as i said before they have lived wild for so long that they have helped shape our landscape, and are infact extremely beneficial to some of our rarest habitats and the species that thrive on them......

the rabbit has been part of our countyside for the best part of a millenia and not only are they an important food source for our 'Native' foxes but also for other native predators such as buzzards, polecats and stoats etc ,Rabbits are also vital ecosystem engineers whose grazing maintains calcareous grassland,dune and heathland habitats, and the often rare species that depend on them.

http://www.norfolkwildlifetrust.org....low-eyes!.aspx



and i dont deny the rabbit causes lots of damage to crops either but at least we have plenty of 'Native' predators (i suppose we can include man here) who feed on them and keep their numbers in check, so inspite of the damage they can do to crops they do benefit land management as grazers.

so it really dosent matter when the cat arrived they dont belong in the wild 'Anywhere' because they are domesticated! so they dont fit in to 'any' ecosystems and never will.



so if youre honest with yourself you'll agree that unlike the rabbit the cat benefits no habitats/wildlife ANYWHERE!....does it??
Reply With Quote
Borderdawn
Dogsey Veteran
Borderdawn is offline  
Location: uk
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,552
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 03:16 PM
Originally Posted by NOUSHKA05 View Post
what have LAWS got to do with anything

at the end of the day it dosent take Einstein to work out that a predator so prolific and efficient a hunter as the domestic cat is not going to have a detrimental impact on wildlife ....and not only on prey species either!!.....

they can outnumber and compete with native predators. Domestic cats eat many of the same animals that native predators do. When present in large numbers, cats can reduce the availability of prey for native predators, such as hawks and weasels.







lol well i knew you wouldnt have an issue with the damage cats do! i picked up a while ago how you view our wildlife






i think you'll find i havent omitted anything lol, no one on here mentoined rabbits! ... when Tarimoor brought up the comparison between rabbits and cats elsewhere i did indeed answer

so here goes again ....rabbits are not considered Native they are considered naturalised as i said before they have lived wild for so long that they have helped shape our landscape, and are infact extremely beneficial to some of our rarest habitats and the species that thrive on them......

the rabbit has been part of our countyside for the best part of a millenia and not only are they an important food source for our 'Native' foxes but also for other native predators such as buzzards, polecats and stoats etc ,Rabbits are also vital ecosystem engineers whose grazing maintains calcareous grassland,dune and heathland habitats, and the often rare species that depend on them.

http://www.norfolkwildlifetrust.org....low-eyes!.aspx



and i dont deny the rabbit causes lots of damage to crops either but at least we have plenty of 'Native' predators (i suppose we can include man here) who feed on them and keep their numbers in check, so inspite of the damage they can do to crops they do benefit land management as grazers.

so it really dosent matter when the cat arrived they dont belong in the wild 'Anywhere' because they are domesticated! so they dont fit in to 'any' ecosystems and never will.



so if youre honest with yourself you'll agree that unlike the rabbit the cat benefits no habitats/wildlife ANYWHERE!....does it??
I honestly cannot be bothered to read all that, suffice to say, do your research on what REALLY kills song birds if you have issue with it, post a thread about it, and you may get a response, and for the record, the thread isnt about Cats either, its Foxes, which IMO should be shot in the town at every opportunity.
Reply With Quote
Noushka05
Dogsey Senior
Noushka05 is offline  
Location: DISNEYLAND
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 389
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 03:28 PM
Originally Posted by Tarimoor View Post
Just a quick note because I'm bugged up, but as this was brought up on another forum, in discussion with Noushka, the introduction of cats to England, apparently predates the introduction of one of the main prey species for foxes, the rabbit.

For whatever reason, one is seen as native, the other isn't. I can only put this down to human selfishness, cats were originally brought here to control vermin, mice and rats; in some cases that is still their role. But it's our selfish desire to keep animals as pets, that's led to any problem; cats are versatile, adaptable creatures, and have thrived in our wildlife rich countryside. Some view this as a problem, and it very much is in certain areas, particularly where feral domestic cats have interbred with the Scottish Wild Cat.

I'll go, before I spread germs, but just thought the point worth making on here too.
sorry but imo theres no excuse for human selfishness anymore, cats are efficient killers of our wildlife...nuff said!
Reply With Quote
Tupacs2legs
Dogsey Veteran
Tupacs2legs is offline  
Location: london.uk
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,012
Female 
 
07-01-2011, 03:28 PM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Not sure about those Layla, I know somebody with a small holding which has a small neutered colony, the Cats protection neutered them, they were already there when they moved in, they agreed to keep them. A few are truly truly evil, but a couple are coming round and will allow her to stroke them. Not sure how "wild" they were originally though.
they are not what i would call true ferals..i have worked with true ferals..not an easy thing to do... foxes are much easier lol
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 16 of 37 « First < 6 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 26 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top