register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Tupacs2legs
Dogsey Veteran
Tupacs2legs is offline  
Location: london.uk
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,012
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 12:56 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
Sadly, not true. They hunt for pleasure as well. An F1 owned by a friend mine killed everything he could lay his paws on, but with the exception of snails, never ate his prey. He was just like a cat, he would play with his prey and then be very surprised when it expired! It was this fact and the fact that Hal would eat rabbits alive when he caught them, that was the final straw that broke the camel's back for me re fox hunting. I became an anti as a consequence.
erm f1 is crossed with dog .......

re the suprised when expired...my lobo does that(hes a dog )
Reply With Quote
rune
Dogsey Veteran
rune is offline  
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 12:58 PM
Originally Posted by JoedeeUK View Post
You cannot compare the two really

Natural wolves do not depend on humans for food-dogs do & if left alone will first seek food & shelter near humans & then if this is not available will resort to hunting.

Domestic dogs on the whole are savengers & not hunters-even the hounds(according to the hunt supporters around here)do not hunt the fox, rabbits etc for food but for the chase !!

Wolves hunt to eat -no other reason
Do you think food is the only resource that is important?

Why do you think some dogs fight?

rune
Reply With Quote
Lotsadogs
Dogsey Senior
Lotsadogs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 709
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 12:58 PM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
I wouldn't have thought so. Was she taken away from her mother at a very young age do you think? Or did she miss out on puppyhood, like my poor Ben, who was kept on a long line in the back garden for 3 years so never had a proper puppyhood? Does she lick and bite at their muzzles, as if asking to be fed?
She was homed at 8 weeks and has another pup of the same age at home too. Different breeds though. She is well handled and trained, they both are, and has been socialised at my puppy romps since 10 weeks and been to class since 12 weeks. There was also an adlt dog there for a while (a friends who was on holiday) and the staff pestered and persued this older dog so much, he had to be given a place to go to that the pups couldn' get to.

So totally different backgroound
Reply With Quote
Lotsadogs
Dogsey Senior
Lotsadogs is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 709
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 01:28 PM
In my view, to study any group of dogs or wolves, or any other canids or indeed species and draw a conclusion that all groups, within the same species, behave the same, is a a very limiting view indeed. One which may often negate the "need" for further learning. Which is not a good approach for general understanding.

it would be like studying a homeless family in Birminham, the royal family, or a small tribe in the outbacks of Africa and trying to apply their structure and behaviour to all humans - it just wouldn't make any sense!!!!

My family is not even the same as my neighbours and neither is yours.

I believe that as in humans, in canids, there are assertive ones and less assertive ones, natural communicators, mother types, hunter types, aloof ones, timid, bold or gregarious ones, teachers, leaders and followers.

I also believe that there are some general "types" of behaviors that are adopted or instinctual in some individuals , whether they are live in groups or not. There are in my experience, policing dogs, nanny dogs, and aggressor dogs, protector dogs, watchdogs etc. Some of these behaviourss are instinctual to some degree, I believe all of these behaviours are usually heightened with learning, experince and age.

Dogs which live in true groups, adopt them more readily, without the interference of humans. Dogs who socialise most often, become more powerfull in whatever role they have adopted and can with experience, or out of group "necessity" . adopt or other required roles.

I think everyone's experience is valid, every point of view worth hearing, but I think that given that we really cant even fully understand the way that humans interact, (and we are human and can talk and write down our thoughts and emotions), then it is highly unlikely that we will ever fully understand the way that dog groups work.

The day we do, is the day that I will stop asking WHY??? and will therefore probably just keel over and die. My life having become rather meaningless!
Reply With Quote
mishflynn
Dogsey Veteran
mishflynn is offline  
Location: Cardiff, UK
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,033
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 01:42 PM
Maybe shes just a needy clingy character, we all know people like that & in general they dont have many friends
Reply With Quote
wilbar
Dogsey Veteran
wilbar is offline  
Location: West Sussex UK
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,044
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 02:17 PM
Originally Posted by rune View Post
So you are saying that all dogs are different and some DO have an ability to survive without humans and therefore have a high survival drive. As do wolves.

So you are agreeing that SOME dogs in SOME situations show survival behaviours simiular to that of wolves. If you don't think they are similar can you specify how they dioffer?

If not we are saying the same thing.

rune
All animals, human or not, have strong survival & self-preservation instincts, of course we do. This is part of the genetic code to try ensure preservation of the species.

But the strategies for survival & self-preservation can be different both between & within species.

Wolves have evolved different survival strategies from domesticated dog. Wolves generally fear humans, rely on their own hunting strategies to feed themselves & rely on being part of a pack to bring down large prey, which is often all that is available in the locations they are now forced (by humans!) to live.

Dogs, the other hand, rely far more on being able to live near or with humans to scrounge & scavenge for food. Obviously they can & will still hunt prey to eat & the breeds that have been less affected by human selective breeding strategies may be more able & likely to hunt & kill rabbits etc.

Given the dire straits of the wild wolf population, & the huge numbers of domestic/feral dogs in the world, it is clear which survival strategy has been most successful in the past few thousand years!!
Reply With Quote
wilbar
Dogsey Veteran
wilbar is offline  
Location: West Sussex UK
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,044
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 02:25 PM
Originally Posted by Lotsadogs View Post
In my view, to study any group of dogs or wolves, or any other canids or indeed species and draw a conclusion that all groups, within the same species, behave the same, is a a very limiting view indeed. One which may often negate the "need" for further learning. Which is not a good approach for general understanding.

Hear, hear


it would be like studying a homeless family in Birminham, the royal family, or a small tribe in the outbacks of Africa and trying to apply their structure and behaviour to all humans - it just wouldn't make any sense!!!!

I used a similar analogy of Kalahari Bushmen & people living in a New York penthouse in the other thread on dominance

My family is not even the same as my neighbours and neither is yours.

I believe that as in humans, in canids, there are assertive ones and less assertive ones, natural communicators, mother types, hunter types, aloof ones, timid, bold or gregarious ones, teachers, leaders and followers.

Yes, there are differences in personality types, partly through nature & partly through nurture. But sometimes I think we can be guilty of attributing human type explanation or names for the dufferent types which can almost suggest the causes for these different types & that can be very misleading.

I also believe that there are some general "types" of behaviors that are adopted or instinctual in some individuals , whether they are live in groups or not. There are in my experience, policing dogs, nanny dogs, and aggressor dogs, protector dogs, watchdogs etc. Some of these behaviourss are instinctual to some degree, I believe all of these behaviours are usually heightened with learning, experince and age.

Dogs which live in true groups, adopt them more readily, without the interference of humans. Dogs who socialise most often, become more powerfull in whatever role they have adopted and can with experience, or out of group "necessity" . adopt or other required roles.

I think everyone's experience is valid, every point of view worth hearing, but I think that given that we really cant even fully understand the way that humans interact, (and we are human and can talk and write down our thoughts and emotions), then it is highly unlikely that we will ever fully understand the way that dog groups work.

The day we do, is the day that I will stop asking WHY??? and will therefore probably just keel over and die. My life having become rather meaningless!
Yes absolutely ~ we still have so much to learn about ourselves, let alone other species. Given that none of us can know what it's like to a dog/wolf or any other species, we can only surmise & make educated guesses from what we observe.
Reply With Quote
rune
Dogsey Veteran
rune is offline  
Location: cornwall uk
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,132
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 02:40 PM
Originally Posted by wilbar View Post
All animals, human or not, have strong survival & self-preservation instincts, of course we do. This is part of the genetic code to try ensure preservation of the species.

But the strategies for survival & self-preservation can be different both between & within species.

Wolves have evolved different survival strategies from domesticated dog. Wolves generally fear humans, rely on their own hunting strategies to feed themselves & rely on being part of a pack to bring down large prey, which is often all that is available in the locations they are now forced (by humans!) to live.

Dogs, the other hand, rely far more on being able to live near or with humans to scrounge & scavenge for food. Obviously they can & will still hunt prey to eat & the breeds that have been less affected by human selective breeding strategies may be more able & likely to hunt & kill rabbits etc.

Given the dire straits of the wild wolf population, & the huge numbers of domestic/feral dogs in the world, it is clear which survival strategy has been most successful in the past few thousand years!!
Which strategies are specifically different for survival within a group? Lets forget food as it is provided for captive wolves and for dogs.

Lets look at other resources---the comfiest resting place, the playthings, the left over bones, the bitches, or the owners in the case of dogs.

How do the behaviours differ?

rune
Reply With Quote
JoedeeUK
Dogsey Veteran
JoedeeUK is offline  
Location: God's Own County
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,584
Female 
 
01-10-2010, 02:44 PM
Given the dire straits of the wild wolf population, & the huge numbers of domestic/feral dogs in the world, it is clear which survival strategy has been most successful in the past few thousand years!!
Of course being hunted to extinction by humans has nothoing to do with the position Wolves & many other species find themselves in of course ?????????
Reply With Quote
wolfdogowner
Dogsey Senior
wolfdogowner is offline  
Location: london, UK
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 583
Male 
 
01-10-2010, 03:19 PM
Originally Posted by ClaireandDaisy View Post
I don`t read wolf research because I don`t have a wolf. I suppose it`s quite romantic to imagine you`re striding across the tundra with your (almost) wolf beside you but it`s a bit like calling your tabby cat `Tiger`.
Meooow.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 7 of 16 « First < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top