register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
smokeybear
Dogsey Veteran
smokeybear is offline  
Location: Wiltshire UK
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,404
Female 
 
10-01-2012, 11:54 PM
No, must have been somebody else.......
Reply With Quote
abbie
Dogsey Veteran
abbie is offline  
Location: Ireland
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,057
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 12:09 AM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
No, must have been somebody else.......
No it was you
Reply With Quote
labradork
Dogsey Veteran
labradork is offline  
Location: West Sussex
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,749
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 12:17 AM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Actually it was the death of a rescue Lab I took in. He went to the army for explosion detection work, was doing fairly well but didnt make it in the end. We rehomed him with a guy who had had a lab before. All was fine until a friend of the man patted him on the arm/shoulder saying goodbye to him in the street. The Lab latched onto his arm and wouldnt let go. After a lot of inquiring the army told us the dog "enjoyed" the sleeve and most likely saw the man as a threat. They also said it was not unusual for them to try different dogs on the sleeve as "fun." The man required many stitches. 17 I think but couldnt swear to it, could have been more.
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
This precisely demonstrates what happens when idiots get hold of dogs.

It is no different from dogs that are allowed to or encouraged to hunt and kill wildlife. Does not mean that those who go shooting are morons.

Nothing to do with bitework per se, just poor temperament combined with uneducated "training".

You can pat my dog on the head, you can shake hands with me, my dog would not see you as a threat, cos he has a genetically sound temperament, has been extremely well socialised and of course very well trained.
Not sure how you have jumped the conclusion that the Lab had a poor temperament and was poorly trained? I'm guessing the temperament of the dog must have be assessed for it be accepted for Army service dog training.

Which begs the question, surely there is always an element of risk when you teach a dog to bite even in a controlled manner? no dog being 100% predictable and all...
Reply With Quote
abbie
Dogsey Veteran
abbie is offline  
Location: Ireland
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,057
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 12:41 AM
Originally Posted by smokeybear View Post
No, must have been somebody else.......
oh BTW I have list of everyone that attended that seminar. I remember you questioning me on here when I said I disliked the training methods electric collars, pinch collars, electric sleeves and said you attended and found nothing wrong.

You attended as as spectator with no dog. Surely you remember
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 07:00 AM
I would imagine all army dogs are assessed for temperament and drive. Indeed, they take quite a lot of 'failed' guide dogs. Awful story Dawn.

I cannot in all honesty comprehend the appeal of a PP trained dog. I think they are accidents waiting to happen. I also do not differentiate between the numpties who do it themselves and some people who do it who are essentially pet owners but think they know it all. Both are dangerous IMO.
Reply With Quote
Ramble
Dogsey Veteran
Ramble is offline  
Location: dogsville
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,141
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 07:01 AM
Abbie perhaps you could search for the thread
and put up a link to clarify? Check through
The list of your posts or dona general search for
keywords?
Reply With Quote
abbie
Dogsey Veteran
abbie is offline  
Location: Ireland
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,057
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 08:45 AM
Originally Posted by Ramble View Post
Abbie perhaps you could search for the thread
and put up a link to clarify? Check through
The list of your posts or dona general search for
keywords?
http://www.dogsey.com/showthread.php?t=135569&page=66

Hmmm, could you say what was so awful about this seminar because I attended it (as an observer) and did not see anything horrible happen to any of the dogs?

(That is not to say I am a supporter of E collars, but as I was present during the whole weekend and a) there were very few dogs used and b) of those not all had e collars on!
Reply With Quote
Tarimoor
Dogsey Senior
Tarimoor is offline  
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 877
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 09:32 AM
Originally Posted by Borderdawn View Post
Actually it was the death of a rescue Lab I took in. He went to the army for explosion detection work, was doing fairly well but didnt make it in the end. We rehomed him with a guy who had had a lab before. All was fine until a friend of the man patted him on the arm/shoulder saying goodbye to him in the street. The Lab latched onto his arm and wouldnt let go. After a lot of inquiring the army told us the dog "enjoyed" the sleeve and most likely saw the man as a threat. They also said it was not unusual for them to try different dogs on the sleeve as "fun." The man required many stitches. 17 I think but couldnt swear to it, could have been more.
The type of training I've attended in the past, did not teach manwork like that, so I can only assume somewhere, something down the line has gone very wrong with the training. The manwork classes I attended were trained in a positive way, the sleeve is the reward, and if the dog gets the exercise right, they get the sleeve. It is easy to muck up a dog if you try and train manwork yourself with little/no experience, but that doesn't mean its the dog that's at fault
Reply With Quote
Moobli
Dogsey Veteran
Moobli is offline  
Location: Scotland
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 19,298
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 09:55 AM
Originally Posted by labradork View Post
Not sure how you have jumped the conclusion that the Lab had a poor temperament and was poorly trained? I'm guessing the temperament of the dog must have be assessed for it be accepted for Army service dog training.

Which begs the question, surely there is always an element of risk when you teach a dog to bite even in a controlled manner? no dog being 100% predictable and all...
Not sure about this, as the Army take GSDs at least that have proven too aggressive for police work.
Reply With Quote
Tassle
Dogsey Veteran
Tassle is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,065
Female 
 
11-01-2012, 10:01 AM
Originally Posted by Ramble View Post
I would imagine all army dogs are assessed for temperament and drive. Indeed, they take quite a lot of 'failed' guide dogs. Awful story Dawn.

I cannot in all honesty comprehend the appeal of a PP trained dog. I think they are accidents waiting to happen. I also do not differentiate between the numpties who do it themselves and some people who do it who are essentially pet owners but think they know it all. Both are dangerous IMO.
No - I cannot understand wanting to buy one in, but I can easily comprehend wanting to teach my own dog. I enjoy the training part, I always have. Although I am not really one for competing.

I do think that the latter part of your sentence is interesting, I guess it is the thinking behind BSL, people believed that the dogs that have been bred for particular uses are just that.

I agree that it can appeal to the wrong people, but does that make it fair to ban it all together? Again - compare to SBTs - they appeal to the wrong types of people, but does that make it fair to ban the breed from the people who are responsible?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 13 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some people !!!!!!!! kat14778 General Dog Chat 15 17-04-2011 01:06 PM
How many people... jesterjenn General Dog Chat 37 26-05-2010 05:28 PM
Why do people lie ? Sal Off-topic Chat 44 24-05-2010 08:29 AM
Some people Sal General Dog Chat 1 15-04-2006 05:42 PM
Some people crazycockers General Dog Chat 41 24-03-2006 03:46 PM

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top