|
||||||
| Welcome to the Dogsey Forums! | ||||
|
Welcome to the LARGEST DOG FORUM in the world!!* Welcome, you are seeing this message because you are viewing our dog owners forum as a guest. You are more than welcome to register and join our friendly community of Dog Lovers, on the biggest and best dog forum in the world!* Doing so will unlock lots of features enabling you to participate on the site... and will also get rid of this message box and the advert on the left. Click here to register for FREE! *Dogsey hosts the largest English language dog-related forum in the world! By total number of posts. |
||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I think both dogs are beautiful and dont need anyone to tell us we have the perfect dog. I have 2 right here! They tell me every single day! |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Im not bothered about KC reg, some of the breeds have changed so much since being reconised by the kc, and they are not the dog they started out to be, im happy with mine KC or NOT |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I think it would be a good idea so that the breed recieved the praise is deserves but I do not think it is necessary as all Northen inuit lovers love their dogs because of who they are not because of the paper they come with. I do worry though that if these breeds were to become kc registered. What would happen to the adults of the breed would they then recieve papers or would they be left as non kc registered if so. What will happen to these dogs obviouisly I know none of the dogsey N.I would be looked at any differently but is it possible that some dogs could be sold on etc... so breeders could have KC dogs? Sorry I am not trying to stir a debate I am just wondering. |
|||||
|