|
||||||
| Welcome to the Dogsey Forums! | ||||
|
Welcome to the LARGEST DOG FORUM in the world!!* Welcome, you are seeing this message because you are viewing our dog owners forum as a guest. You are more than welcome to register and join our friendly community of Dog Lovers, on the biggest and best dog forum in the world!* Doing so will unlock lots of features enabling you to participate on the site... and will also get rid of this message box and the advert on the left. Click here to register for FREE! *Dogsey hosts the largest English language dog-related forum in the world! By total number of posts. |
||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I did think that I would try phoning some estate agents on Monday to get a better idea, but there are so many people on here with lots of knowledge I thought I might get a speedier and more correct response The Scottish clause is interesting...I'd not heard of that one |
|||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi scorpio i dont know if this will help, it sounds quite complecated. Sue "The biggest problem is getting a mortgage. Ordinary residential mortgages are usually not available, so it normally has to be a cash buy. A holding of 15 acres is scarcely viable for a person to make a living in agriculture, and the amount asked for the property would be beyond the reach of an agricultural employee who might want it. So it is either being marketed so that it can be shown that despite marketing for 1-2 years, nobody was interested, even at a reduced (about -30%) value, or so that someone will come along, pay cash, and hope the Council will not notice. The conditions usually say that the property has to be occupied by a person whose main occupation (or a retired person whose last main occupation) was in agriculture. There are variations on this format and sometimes the precise wording of the planning condition can be important. The Council have a practical problem of establishing that a breach of the condition has taken place. Leaving aside the nosey neighbour who phones the Council up about it, perhaps to settle some score with the occupier, if the fields are grazed or crops grown on them, how likely is it that the Council will knock on the door one day asking for proof that the occupier actually works full time in agriculture? So allow a neighbouring farmer to stick his sheep on the fields sometimes, and the Council probably won't find out. Whatever you do, don't attract attention by starting stock car racing or car boot sales on the fields or something like that! Then after 10 years you submit an application for a certificate of lawful use, showing proof of uninterrupted non-agricultural employment, and you are then safe. |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
If we go down that route we would be cash buyers so that would knock the mortgage problem on the head, and I've always fancied getting some goats or sheep Definately worth looking into then |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Agricultural occupancy means you need to live within so many miles of the area and make the majority of your income in the agricultural or forestry trade. |
|||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
These properties are always a lot cheaper than the norm, and we came across a few when searching many years ago. It means you have to prove that you will be using the land for agricultural purposes of some sort, i.e. making hay, baling it and using or selling it, that kind of thing. Mortgage companies aren't keen either for some strange reason. It's a big "tie" to buying a property, you should really avoid them is my advice, I know we did. |
|||||
|