|
Location: UK
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 709
|
|
Originally Posted by
SLB
I'm confused. For ages I believed that a male dog or even a female dog for that matter that humped you or something else was either through frustration or to gain dominance.
Since Joining Dogsey I have heard that dogs do not dominate humans. Yet whilst watching "It's me or the dog" VS said that a lovely looking Bulldog was humping for dominance.
So whats the story?
Is there such a thing as a dominant dog?
Interesting question.
I think that the answer lies quite often in the terminology and its fahionability at any one time.
The term Dominant, in dog training and behaviour terms, has come to be associated with all sorts of things that many do not like the idea of. For instance rank reduction regimes, Alpha rolling a dog, eating before a dog type Jan "Fennel" assertiveness gestures, carrot and stick or even more frowned upon, stick training.
Can a dog DOMINATE an owner or a family or a situation, of course it can! Any dog which barks continuously, ruins the furniture, wont allow access to the owners bed, or in out of the house, can in some ways DOMINATE the environment and lifestyle. Does it make it a DOMINANT dog? Not necessarily in pack structure terms.
Would modern positive trainers like to call that dominance? Nope I'm guessing most wouldn't.
Humping is a sign that the dog is humping, nothing more!
It could be natural boredom behaviour, it could be attention seeking, it could be normal play behaviour, it could be sexual frustration, it could be the dog seeing the human as a humping toy. It could have been inadvertently rewarded and therfore trained in. It could be caused by a host of things.
But it is not in itself a sign of implicit dominance.
Unfortunatly, in my view, the tendency by many to move away from old fashioned "dominance theory" thinking and resolution, has led some to believe that dominant animals do not exist or indeed that packs of dogs have no structure and nor degrees of assertive and less assertive animals. Controversial as it may be perceived, In my view this is a falasy. In every single pack I have observed there has certainly been individuals who show clear assertiveness (dominance?) over others in some situations. There are even individuals that show assertiveness over others in most situations. There are also dogs who show this tendency over their owners too. But any single act does not make a dog dominant in itself. And nearly every single act of "DOMINANCE" toward humans that I have seen has boiled down to a need for more training and greater understanding, in that area.
So, is there such a thing as a dominant dog?
Well, in my experience, there is such a thing as a dog who can dominate certain situations or events with its inherent or learned behaviour for sure!
Does that in itself kake it dominant? No, I don't think so. Does it mean that an old fashioned dominance reduction program might stop the dog behaving that way? Depends on the situation, but possibly not.
Does it mean that training and education can change the dogs behaviour and make it work for the owner? Quite probably - dogs with tendency toward very assertive or controlling behaviour are usually highly intelligent individuals who often respond particularly well to training.
Nor sure I explained that really well, but hope it made some sense?