Cow attack - could this set a precedent?
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/cumbrian_wo...rPath=memories
Cumbrian woman crushed by cows awarded £250,000 compensation
By Pamela McGowan
Last updated 14:42, Monday, 06 July 2009
A Cumbrian woman left fighting for her life after being trampled by a herd of cows six years ago has won her battle for compensation.
The ruling could have serious implications for all farmers who graze stock alongside public rights of way.
Shirley McKaskie, now 50, was walking her dog in fields around her home at Greystoke Gill, near Penrith, when the cattle, which had young calves, reacted violently.
She suffered serious head injuries and was hospitalised for months following the incident, in May 2003.
Last year Miss McKaskie, of Croft Barn, launched a £1m claim against farmer John Cameron, of Millrigg Farm, near Greystoke.
She has now been awarded an interim pay-out of £250,000 – plus £100,000 costs – but this has been put on hold pending an appeal from the farmer.
Her legal team argued that the 40-strong herd, a number of which had calves, had the potential to be unpredictable. Yet they were being grazed on land which had a public footpath crossing it, with no signs to warn of possible danger.
After a year of civil court action – which has attracted widespread attention from both the farming community and walkers’ groups – the judge has now ruled in favour of Miss McKaskie.
It could now set a legal precedent for future cases.
At an earlier hearing it emerged that Miss McKaskie had used the public footpath to cut across fields on her way to meet her partner, Donald Cameron, in the local pub.
She was attacked by the herd of Simmental-cross cows, each weighing about half a tonne, which tossed her around and left her unconscious.
She was found by the farmer, who used a quad bike to get her back to his farmhouse and call for help. Miss McKaskie needed emergency brain surgery and also sustained a broken left arm, broken ribs and extensive bruising.
The court heard that she had veered away from the line of the footpath but Judge Howarth ruled that the route was not clearly marked. He stated in his ruling: “It is fairly argued on behalf of Miss McKaskie that Mr Cameron plainly demonstrated a lack of concern which route was adopted by walkers when trying to use the footpath.”
He also addressed the fact that this case could set a precedent in future proceedings, though he stressed that the facts of each individual case must be taken into account.
Miss McKaskie’s legal team said they were delighted the wait was finally over. Her solicitor Frank Matthewson said: “She was lucky to survive the incident and as a result her life has changed beyond all recognition.”
But as the farmer has indicated he wishes to appeal, they will now have to wait to determine the full scale of compensation.
Mr Cameron did not attend last week’s hearing at Blackpool County Court but his wife and business partner, Doreen Cameron, was reported as saying she was “absolutely disgusted” at the outcome.
Farmers groups have also expressed their disappointment. David Cotton, vice chairman of the Royal Association of Dairy Farmers, said in some parts of the country farmers can no longer put cattle in fields as footpaths are being used so much. And the National Farmers Union (NFU) said it was concerned at the suggestion that cattle should not be grazed in fields with footpaths.