register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
View Poll Results: Poll - Do you agree you should be alpha male over your dog?
Yes 70 39.33%
No 71 39.89%
Other, please specify 37 20.79%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll - please see pinned thread in this section for details.



Reply
Page 81 of 92 « First < 31 71 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 91 > Last »
JanieM
Dogsey Senior
JanieM is offline  
Location: Cambs
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 906
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 07:56 AM
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg View Post
it's not about dominance, alpha or "pack theory" but about manners, boundaries, and bringing up dogs so they can happily fit into modern society and feel comfortable in it with us

Wys
x
After following this thread as best I can, I think the above sums up what it all means for me.


Just reading these last few posts though and thinking about wolves in the wild in different habitats, some harsher than others. It seems to me that if a "pack" doesn't fit in with what we humans think a pack should be like that we make up excuses for as to why that may be. But isn't it just the case the wolves will adapt to various environments and therefore change their behaviour or maybe the structure of their pack to suit? Ultimately these are wild wolves doing what they have to to survive and so we can't assume it not a "proper" pack.
Not sure I've explained what I mean very well .

But again I ask, what has this got to do with anything when my dog is not a wolf and therefore real wolf behaviour is going to have little bearing in how I interact with her?
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:42 AM
Hi Promethean: I am not sure how to do this multiple quote system, with the answers underneath each paragraph, so I have hopefully quoted your points, and then I've put my responses in italics underneath. Here goes !:-

Originally Posted by Promethean View Post
Ultimately that is exactly what it's about - at least the way you guys look at it.

No it is not. I have tried to explain this to you over and over again, but have failed. This is my fault, I'm sorry I am not clever enough with words to be able to get my point across.

It's true that the breeding male is not aggressive but it is not for the reason Ellis believes. It is simply because the offspring do not challenge their sire for resources. I know Ellis like to make the claim about beta enforcers however it has not been observed by others. I am assuming the lack of corroborating evidence means his claims are false.

David Mech agrees with SE though - in relation to the Yellowstone wolves (who are living in the "true" style of wild wolves before their persecution by man).


That doesn't tell me anything. You merely stated a trait and then explained it away by claiming he was an alpha male. I thought you were the alpha? See how when you break it down, these ideas make less and less sense?

I AM ... as the human to my dog. But Hal was an alpha male in relation to other dogs. He was not OUR alpha. I'm sorry again that I don't have the ability to be able to make you understand this, I'm not good at explaining myself sometimes.

There is also little evolutionary payback in altruism to a genetically unrelated con specific unless during mating. What you recount is only what I've stated. That there is no pack dominance as believed by some. If there was, we couldn't get our dogs to socialize the way they dog.
I prefer not to use the word dominance, because it implies physical force, which neither a good human alpha male and female owner, nor an alpha male wolf or dog, will use. Our dogs socialise amongst themselves, this is true, but the whole "rank" thing is there the whole time! Watch a group of dogs meeting, greeting, sniffing each other's bums, watch the position of the tail, the carriage of the head, the state of the pupils (are they dilated?). This is how dogs suss out who's what in terms of status.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:43 AM
Sorry Promethean - that did not work very well !
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:47 AM
Originally Posted by Ben Mcfuzzylugs View Post
Promethian, that is a really good point
We all expect our dogs to pretty happily live in a very fluid pack, lots of different dogs comming and going all the time
If v few dogs are truly alpha and its the betas that are supposed to do all the fighting wouldnt there be lots more fighting??
But there is Ben !! Almost every time we go out to areas such as public woods where there are a lot of dogs, there always seems to be at least one or two scraps. Nothing serious, just pistols at dawn, but if you count these as fights, then there certainly is lots of fighting.

But true fighting, where blood is drawn, no, I agree that is, thankfully, quite rare.

But whether you are talking about a scrap or a full blown fight, you can guarantee that pretty much it will have been started by a beta enforcer. Most dogs are betas, of varying levels. I am not sure that the Enforcer is the most common level of beta-ness, I like to think not.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:49 AM
Originally Posted by bordercollie6 View Post
As long as its done in a nice way, dogs need some one who is in charge and they need rules and bounderies like kids, they feel more secure and it gives th dogs more confidence.
A happy medium i say works really well
Very well said, bordercollie. I like to think my boy Tai is the perfect example of a reasonably obedient, well behaved, happy and confident dog.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:53 AM
Originally Posted by Promethean View Post
Exactly. Our dogs accept the comings and goings of known and unknown dogs without an social implications. The events are entirely insignificant. This points to a loose, assemblage of convenience; not a pack. A pack would be impacted by such absences and they would also react against unknown intruders.

Promethean : maybe the situation is entirely different in the States, where of course per head of population you have a gazillion times more space for recreation than we do.

But here, when our dogs are off lead, meeting and greeting each other, introducing themselves, there is a SHEDLOAD of social implications going down of HUGE significance to the dogs. These dogs are of course not "packs", they are dogs from different "packs" (their human packs) coming together for socialisation. Just as important for our dogs as the exercise they gain from a walk, is the social interaction with their own kind. Without this vital socialisation with their own species, and indeed other humans, our dogs become withdrawn, possibly snappy, bad-tempered and very unhappy dogs.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:54 AM
Originally Posted by mishflynn View Post
You Should Tell CM that hun!!!!!
!!

Good one Mish - I disagree with your implication of course !!
Reply With Quote
Tassle
Dogsey Veteran
Tassle is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,065
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:54 AM
Originally Posted by Gnasher View Post
But there is Ben !! Almost every time we go out to areas such as public woods where there are a lot of dogs, there always seems to be at least one or two scraps. Nothing serious, just pistols at dawn, but if you count these as fights, then there certainly is lots of fighting.

But true fighting, where blood is drawn, no, I agree that is, thankfully, quite rare.

But whether you are talking about a scrap or a full blown fight, you can guarantee that pretty much it will have been started by a beta enforcer. Most dogs are betas, of varying levels. I am not sure that the Enforcer is the most common level of beta-ness, I like to think not.
Gosh - it hardly every happens here.

I was once laughed at by a well known trainer in London, he told me I would never make a living in Cornwall as no-one had dog dog aggression problems.

I can walk my 'Pack' (anything up to on the dunes and meet single or groups of dogs and 99% of the time there is no bust up (either from mine or the others)

I have done social walks alot, never any issues.
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 08:58 AM
Originally Posted by Wysiwyg View Post
But, this is not "alpha" in the traditional sense of using dominance, force, or if not, using pack leadership theory as per say, Jan Fennell or John Fisher before he altered his views..... so I hope you voted No?
Or did you vote Yes?

I think a lot of peeps voted Yes when they should have actually voted No.

IYSWIM

Because I agree with what you wrote but voted No as it's not about dominance, alpha or "pack theory" but about manners, boundaries, and bringing up dogs so they can happily fit into modern society and feel comfortable in it with us

Wys
x
Wys, Wys, Wys, a human alpha does NOT use force or dominance !! That is going to become my mantra from now on !!

Manners, boundaries, bringing up dogs so they fit into our modern society ... great one, Wys ! THIS IS what I have done with Tai, as Alpha Female. When he came to us just over a year ago, he had no manners but some boundaries. He now pretty well has perfect manners, and knows and accepts all our boundaries set by us. This is being a good Alpha human
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
14-05-2009, 09:01 AM
I've got to take the wolf out for walkies now, he's desperate he has just told me and needs to go NOW !!

See - he does dominate me after all !!

Back later !
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 81 of 92 « First < 31 71 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 91 > Last »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 


© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top