register for free
View our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Our sister sites
Velvetboxers
Dogsey Veteran
Velvetboxers is offline  
Location: U K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,588
Female 
 
22-01-2013, 08:51 PM
SashaBoxers But if the problem was known about during the dog and bitches lifetime of breeding surely can you not see that to stop breeding with them is better than to continue. If you only use sound stock then eventually the incidences of this problem will decrease and hopefully one day disappear.
The whole point of the matter was it 'wasnt' known, its only in recent years that the problem has been highlighted. My bitch wasnt diagnosed until early 2010. She was born in 2004. There are a handful of Boxers who have lived beyond expectations, she is one of them. There are no known records of any other dogs from her dam having this problem. Our other Boxer had the same dam. His sire is our bitches half brother & he is fine. By the time our bitch was diagnosed her dam was retired from breeding anyway
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
23-01-2013, 09:31 AM
Originally Posted by tawneywolf View Post

Just saying oh well BYB and Puppy Farmers breed as well, and they don't bother, so we won't doesn't get anyone anywhere.
I agree, but that`s not what I was implying, my point was directed to the remark, (or implication) that the Boxer breed is doomed due to breeders not hip scoring, along with the accusation that the KC is responsible for all health issues in our breeds.

My point being, a very small percentage of pedigree breeders actually adhere to ANY health screening, the majority of dogs are bred by those who don`t care about health screening (and in many cases have no knowledge of health screening).

I agree the bar should always be raised, but as high as it goes , it will still only be a small percentage of breeders who adhere to it.

Not forgetting the buyer, they also need to take some responsibility and educate themselves in canine health issues, but sadly the majority fall down on this, as you said..... how many times do you here the "I only want a pet" there is a warped sense of thinking (held by some) that because they only want a pet, they dont have to A) pay a lot , B) buy from a reputable breeder C) have no interest in health issues , this logic is baffling , because , surely they want their "pet" to live a long and healthy life.

A friend of mine had a litter of Boxers last year, not ONE of her new owners asked at any time about heart scoring, they either , did not care, did not know , or were not interested.............and that sadly is why we will never get away from the unscrupulous breeder, because most people don`t care or know about any health issues.

Point to make, the friend with the litter made it clear to ALL her new owners, that the sire and dam had good clear scores, she went on to educated all of them on the health problems in our breed.

The KC has raised its bar, and I am sure will continue to do so, (look at the vet checks they now do at shows) , this can only be a good thing, but again it only affects a very small percentage of pedigree breeders.....
Reply With Quote
Gnasher
Dogsey Veteran
Gnasher is offline  
Location: East Midlands, UK
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,775
Female 
 
23-01-2013, 12:25 PM
Originally Posted by Sashatheboxer View Post
But if the problem was known about during the dog and bitches lifetime of breeding surely can you not see that to stop breeding with them is better than to continue. If you only use sound stock then eventually the incidences of this problem will decrease and hopefully one day disappear.




Humans are not animals and equating your story with that of a breeder choosing healthy dogs above infirm just goes to show me that you fail to understand how a good ethical breeder works. Selective breeding is not simply done at one level. It is done over generations.
Take a look at any dogs pedigree, you will see that breeders have long since been selective over which dogs they put to which bitches. How many incestuous couplings are there in the average pedigree? Depending on what the breeder is looking for it can be many or none. The only reason they are there is because the breeder wants to continue a certain characteristic.

If a breeder produces a litter of pups from dog A and bitch A that prove to have an hereditary disease then ethically they should stop using A to A. Now it might be that only one of the pair either is found to carry a defective gene or fails on its hip score which might mean they can put bitch A to dog C and so on. This is selective breeding in dogs. Granted this is a simplified version of it all, but one which I feel gets the message across.

And what do I expect from Dogsey Forum with regards the KC, well friends, if you do not know the power of persuasion/lobbying with regards getting things changed then you really do not know how the KC works. Given enough pressure they will bend and will demand all dogs be hip scored etc not just Boxers but GSD's, Labs etc etc.

Never does an ethical breeder simply shrug off the health of their pups as being . 'These things happen' or so I think should be the case. they should be striving to make sure it doesnt to the best of their ability no matter how many years it takes.
I am reading through this thread with great interest and have refrained from commenting until I have done so ... but I have to point out that humans very definitely ARE animals. The concept of healthy breeding applies to dogs, horses, ourselves, cats, every single mammalian species on the planet.
Reply With Quote
Sashatheboxer
Dogsey Junior
Sashatheboxer is offline  
Location: Harrogate, England
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Male 
 
23-01-2013, 12:26 PM
I accept I know little, hence why I joined this forum.

Was my ascertion that the Boxer breed is screwed erroneous. Not in my opinion. You have all highlighted a disease that I was hitherto unaware of, JKD, as being a problem within Boxers. Add to this the HD, Spondalocis, Heart Problems, etc, etc our breed is pretty much it would seem on the decline.
This is something that saddens me no end. I love the boxer breed. Sasha has been my faithful companion for many years and I hope she will continue being at my side for many years to come.

Perhaps I am naive with regards what the KC can do, but surely if they say 'this is what a good breeder should be doing' instead of saying 'we leave it up to the individual to choose what they do' then things might begin to change.
Reply With Quote
Murf
Dogsey Veteran
Murf is offline  
Location: herts uk
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,210
Male 
 
23-01-2013, 12:33 PM
Its not Hd that worries me about my boxers its cancer and bloat . being around boxers for only 6 years yet i have seen cancer end many a young boxers life . And bloat is such a scary thing to happen,and thats not just boxers of course.... ps i own a boxer with HD...
Reply With Quote
Carole
Supervisor
Carole is offline  
Location: Scotland UK
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 45,029
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
23-01-2013, 03:00 PM
Originally Posted by Murf View Post
Its not Hd that worries me about my boxers its cancer and bloat .
The amount of cancer in the boxer breed scares me

Star fought cancer twice and she was not even 10 years. First the mast cell cancer which is common in boxers but more so the low grade tumours and the second bone cancer another which is common in boxers.

Can't even blame inbreeding as her COI was something like 3.6.
Reply With Quote
Jackie
Dogsey Veteran
Jackie is offline  
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,122
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
23-01-2013, 03:09 PM
Originally Posted by Sashatheboxer View Post
I accept I know little, hence why I joined this forum.

Was my ascertion that the Boxer breed is screwed erroneous. Not in my opinion. You have all highlighted a disease that I was hitherto unaware of, JKD, as being a problem within Boxers. Add to this the HD, Spondalocis, Heart Problems, etc, etc our breed is pretty much it would seem on the decline.
This is something that saddens me no end. I love the boxer breed. Sasha has been my faithful companion for many years and I hope she will continue being at my side for many years to come.

Perhaps I am naive with regards what the KC can do, but surely if they say 'this is what a good breeder should be doing' instead of saying 'we leave it up to the individual to choose what they do' then things might begin to change.

I think that's a huge exaggeration


Originally Posted by Carole View Post
The amount of cancer in the boxer breed scares me

Star fought cancer twice and she was not even 10 years. First the mast cell cancer which is common in boxers but more so the low grade tumours and the second bone cancer another which is common in boxers.

Can't even blame inbreeding as her COI was something like 3.6.
I agree, cancer seem to plague most of our dogs, sadly it does not discriminate between breeds or species , everywhere you look someone or some thing seems to be stricken with it.
Reply With Quote
Balas mum
Dogsey Junior
Balas mum is offline  
Location: tortosa,spain
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 136
Female 
 
23-01-2013, 03:11 PM
Originally Posted by Carole View Post
The amount of cancer in the boxer breed scares me

Star fought cancer twice and she was not even 10 years. First the mast cell cancer which is common in boxers but more so the low grade tumours and the second bone cancer another which is common in boxers.

Can't even blame inbreeding as her COI was something like 3.6.
On top of all her other problems my girl was diagnosed with bone cancer of the upper jaw at 10 months of age.I have just looked up her COI and its 21.5%.My vet said it was just one of those things.As it is she now has no sign of cancer,i guess we were very lucky.She also has epilepsy,thankfully very mild at the moment.

I know of several boxers dying of cancer and it is very worrying.
Reply With Quote
Carole
Supervisor
Carole is offline  
Location: Scotland UK
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 45,029
Female  Diamond Supporter 
 
23-01-2013, 03:16 PM
Originally Posted by Balas mum View Post
On top of all her other problems my girl was diagnosed with bone cancer of the upper jaw at 10 months of age.I have just looked up her COI and its 21.5%.My vet said it was just one of those things.As it is she now has no sign of cancer,i guess we were very lucky.She also has epilepsy,thankfully very mild at the moment.

I know of several boxers dying of cancer and it is very worrying.
Sounds like your girl has been through a lot Good to hear she is doing ok now.
Reply With Quote
tawneywolf
Moderator
tawneywolf is offline  
Location: Bolton
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24,075
Female  Gold Supporter 
 
23-01-2013, 03:16 PM
21% is pretty high, really you need to be looking at around 7% at the highest, 25% is the equivalent of a father/daughter mating
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 8 of 11 « First < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My dog has zigzag down spine?o shwaka11 Dog Health 1 18-08-2012 09:05 AM
Acute osteoarthritis - spine lilbear Dog Health 3 07-03-2010 04:48 PM
Mum has broken her Spine Benzmum Health & Fitness 30 11-10-2007 12:37 PM
update on sam (arthritus in spine) Katie23 General Dog Chat 5 21-03-2007 06:01 PM
Little lumps along spine - mange? fleas? Steve Dog Health 2 10-11-2005 04:46 AM

© Copyright 2016, Dogsey   Contact Us - Dogsey - Top Contact us | Archive | Privacy | Terms of use | Top